{"title":"创作者信息对人工智能和人类创作的艺术品偏好的影响","authors":"Seungmin Nam, Jiwon Song, Chai-Youn Kim","doi":"10.14695/kjsos.2022.25.3.107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Researchers have shown that aesthetic judgments of artworks depend on contexts, such as the authenticity of an artwork (Newman & Bloom, 2011) and an artwork’s location of display (Kirk et al., 2009; Silveira et al., 2015). The present study aims to examine whether contextual information related to the creator, such as whether an artwork was created by a human or artificial intelligence (AI), influences viewers’ preference judgments of an artwork. Methods: Images of Impressionist landscape paintings were selected as human-made artworks. AI-made artwork stimuli were created using Google’s Deep Dream Generator by mimicking the Impressionist style via deep learning algorithms. Participants performed a preference rating task on each of the 108 artwork stimuli accompanied by one of the two creator labels. After this task, an art experience questionnaire (AEQ) was given to participants to examine whether individual differences in art experience influence their preference judgments. Results: Setting AEQ scores as a covariate in a two-way ANCOVA analysis, the stimuli with the human-made context were preferred over the stimuli with the AI-made context. Regarding the types of stimuli, the viewers preferred AI-made stimuli to human-made stimuli. There was no interaction effect between the two factors. Conclusion: These results suggest that preferences for visual artworks are influenced by the contextual information of the creator when the individual differences in art experience are controlled.","PeriodicalId":153223,"journal":{"name":"Korean Society for Emotion and Sensibility","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Influence of Creator Information on Preference for Artificial Intelligence- and Human-generated Artworks\",\"authors\":\"Seungmin Nam, Jiwon Song, Chai-Youn Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.14695/kjsos.2022.25.3.107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: Researchers have shown that aesthetic judgments of artworks depend on contexts, such as the authenticity of an artwork (Newman & Bloom, 2011) and an artwork’s location of display (Kirk et al., 2009; Silveira et al., 2015). The present study aims to examine whether contextual information related to the creator, such as whether an artwork was created by a human or artificial intelligence (AI), influences viewers’ preference judgments of an artwork. Methods: Images of Impressionist landscape paintings were selected as human-made artworks. AI-made artwork stimuli were created using Google’s Deep Dream Generator by mimicking the Impressionist style via deep learning algorithms. Participants performed a preference rating task on each of the 108 artwork stimuli accompanied by one of the two creator labels. After this task, an art experience questionnaire (AEQ) was given to participants to examine whether individual differences in art experience influence their preference judgments. Results: Setting AEQ scores as a covariate in a two-way ANCOVA analysis, the stimuli with the human-made context were preferred over the stimuli with the AI-made context. Regarding the types of stimuli, the viewers preferred AI-made stimuli to human-made stimuli. There was no interaction effect between the two factors. Conclusion: These results suggest that preferences for visual artworks are influenced by the contextual information of the creator when the individual differences in art experience are controlled.\",\"PeriodicalId\":153223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Society for Emotion and Sensibility\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Society for Emotion and Sensibility\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14695/kjsos.2022.25.3.107\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Society for Emotion and Sensibility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14695/kjsos.2022.25.3.107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:研究人员已经表明,艺术品的审美判断取决于语境,如艺术品的真实性(Newman & Bloom, 2011)和艺术品的展示位置(Kirk等人,2009;silverira et al., 2015)。本研究旨在研究与创作者相关的上下文信息,例如艺术品是由人类还是人工智能(AI)创作的,是否会影响观众对艺术品的偏好判断。方法:选取印象派风景画中的图像作为人工艺术品。人工智能制作的艺术品刺激是通过深度学习算法模仿印象派风格,使用谷歌的“深度梦生成器”制作的。参与者对108幅艺术作品中的每一幅都进行了偏好评级任务,并附上了两个创作者标签中的一个。在此任务之后,我们给参与者一份艺术体验问卷(AEQ)来检验艺术体验的个体差异是否会影响他们的偏好判断。结果:在双向ANCOVA分析中,将AEQ分数作为协变量,人工情境的刺激优于人工情境的刺激。在刺激类型方面,观众更喜欢人工智能制造的刺激,而不是人工制造的刺激。两因素间无交互作用。结论:这些结果表明,在控制艺术体验的个体差异的情况下,创作者的语境信息会影响视觉艺术作品的偏好。
The Influence of Creator Information on Preference for Artificial Intelligence- and Human-generated Artworks
Purpose: Researchers have shown that aesthetic judgments of artworks depend on contexts, such as the authenticity of an artwork (Newman & Bloom, 2011) and an artwork’s location of display (Kirk et al., 2009; Silveira et al., 2015). The present study aims to examine whether contextual information related to the creator, such as whether an artwork was created by a human or artificial intelligence (AI), influences viewers’ preference judgments of an artwork. Methods: Images of Impressionist landscape paintings were selected as human-made artworks. AI-made artwork stimuli were created using Google’s Deep Dream Generator by mimicking the Impressionist style via deep learning algorithms. Participants performed a preference rating task on each of the 108 artwork stimuli accompanied by one of the two creator labels. After this task, an art experience questionnaire (AEQ) was given to participants to examine whether individual differences in art experience influence their preference judgments. Results: Setting AEQ scores as a covariate in a two-way ANCOVA analysis, the stimuli with the human-made context were preferred over the stimuli with the AI-made context. Regarding the types of stimuli, the viewers preferred AI-made stimuli to human-made stimuli. There was no interaction effect between the two factors. Conclusion: These results suggest that preferences for visual artworks are influenced by the contextual information of the creator when the individual differences in art experience are controlled.