程序正义的诊断方法

Douglas H. Flint, Lynn M. Haley, Jeffrey J. McNally
{"title":"程序正义的诊断方法","authors":"Douglas H. Flint, Lynn M. Haley, Jeffrey J. McNally","doi":"10.11634/216796061706247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Procedural justice has shown significant linkages to organizational outcomes such as organizational commitment and turnover. For this reason, we propose that measures of procedural justice can serve a diagnostic function to signal potential problems with important organizational-level outcomes. However, if used alone, it does not tell us which specific procedures require change in order to resolve potential problems. This study proposes, and tests, a methodology which combines general measures of procedural justice with measures of perceptions of specific procedures in order to diagnose problems with organizational outcomes. This is tested in two call centers. The research design employs a survey of randomly selected employees from the call centers. The effects of a general measure of procedural justice on the organizational outcomes of turnover intentions and organizational commitment are examined. Further, we examine the effects of attitudes towards specific monitoring procedures on a general measure of procedural justice. Baron and Kenny’s statistical methodology is employed to test these relationships; to show that procedural justice mediates the effect of employee perceptions of monitoring on turnover intentions and organizational commitment. Our findings support complete mediation effects. The implications of these findings are that general perceptions of procedural justice can be used to screen for potential problems with organizational outcomes. If general effects are found, organizations can employ more specific measures of organizational procedures to target procedural problems. The methodology proposed here has the potential to identify specific procedures that organizations can focus on in order to improve organizational outcomes. Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE AR-SA /* Style Definitions */ \n table.MsoNormalTable \n {mso-style-name:\"Table Normal\"; \n mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; \n mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; \n mso-style-noshow:yes; \n mso-style-priority:99; \n mso-style-parent:\"\"; \n mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; \n mso-para-margin:0in; \n mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; \n text-align:justify; \n mso-pagination:widow-orphan; \n font-size:11.0pt; \n font-family:\"Calibri\",\"sans-serif\"; \n mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; \n mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; \n mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; \n mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;}","PeriodicalId":206506,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Business and Management","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Diagnostic Method for Procedural Justice\",\"authors\":\"Douglas H. Flint, Lynn M. Haley, Jeffrey J. McNally\",\"doi\":\"10.11634/216796061706247\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Procedural justice has shown significant linkages to organizational outcomes such as organizational commitment and turnover. For this reason, we propose that measures of procedural justice can serve a diagnostic function to signal potential problems with important organizational-level outcomes. However, if used alone, it does not tell us which specific procedures require change in order to resolve potential problems. This study proposes, and tests, a methodology which combines general measures of procedural justice with measures of perceptions of specific procedures in order to diagnose problems with organizational outcomes. This is tested in two call centers. The research design employs a survey of randomly selected employees from the call centers. The effects of a general measure of procedural justice on the organizational outcomes of turnover intentions and organizational commitment are examined. Further, we examine the effects of attitudes towards specific monitoring procedures on a general measure of procedural justice. Baron and Kenny’s statistical methodology is employed to test these relationships; to show that procedural justice mediates the effect of employee perceptions of monitoring on turnover intentions and organizational commitment. Our findings support complete mediation effects. The implications of these findings are that general perceptions of procedural justice can be used to screen for potential problems with organizational outcomes. If general effects are found, organizations can employ more specific measures of organizational procedures to target procedural problems. The methodology proposed here has the potential to identify specific procedures that organizations can focus on in order to improve organizational outcomes. Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE AR-SA /* Style Definitions */ \\n table.MsoNormalTable \\n {mso-style-name:\\\"Table Normal\\\"; \\n mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; \\n mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; \\n mso-style-noshow:yes; \\n mso-style-priority:99; \\n mso-style-parent:\\\"\\\"; \\n mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; \\n mso-para-margin:0in; \\n mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; \\n text-align:justify; \\n mso-pagination:widow-orphan; \\n font-size:11.0pt; \\n font-family:\\\"Calibri\\\",\\\"sans-serif\\\"; \\n mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; \\n mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; \\n mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; \\n mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;}\",\"PeriodicalId\":206506,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Business and Management\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Business and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11634/216796061706247\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Business and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11634/216796061706247","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

程序公正显示出与组织成果(如组织承诺和人员流动)的显著联系。出于这个原因,我们建议程序公正的措施可以作为一种诊断功能,以表明具有重要组织层面结果的潜在问题。但是,如果单独使用,它不会告诉我们需要更改哪些具体程序以解决潜在问题。本研究提出并测试了一种方法,该方法将程序公正的一般措施与对特定程序的看法措施相结合,以诊断组织结果的问题。这在两个呼叫中心进行了测试。研究设计采用随机选择的员工从呼叫中心的调查。研究了程序公正对离职意向和组织承诺的组织结果的影响。此外,我们还研究了对具体监督程序的态度对程序正义的一般衡量标准的影响。巴伦和肯尼的统计方法被用来检验这些关系;结果表明,程序公正在员工监控感知对离职意向和组织承诺的影响中起中介作用。我们的研究结果支持完全的中介效应。这些发现的含义是,程序公正的一般观念可以用来筛选组织结果的潜在问题。如果发现了一般效果,组织可以采用更具体的组织程序措施来针对程序问题。这里提出的方法有可能确定组织可以关注的具体程序,以改善组织成果。EN-US X-NONE AR-SA /*样式定义*/表。mso-style-name:"Table Normal";mso-tstyle-rowband-size: 0;mso-tstyle-colband-size: 0;mso-style-noshow:是的;mso-style-priority: 99;mso-style-parent:“”;mso- font - family:宋体;mso-para-margin: 0;mso-para-margin-bottom: .0001pt;text-align:证明;mso-pagination: widow-orphan;字体大小:11.0分;字体类型:“Calibri”、“无衬线”;mso-ascii-font-family: Calibri;mso-ascii-theme-font: minor-latin;mso-hansi-font-family: Calibri;mso-hansi-theme-font: minor-latin;}
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Diagnostic Method for Procedural Justice
Procedural justice has shown significant linkages to organizational outcomes such as organizational commitment and turnover. For this reason, we propose that measures of procedural justice can serve a diagnostic function to signal potential problems with important organizational-level outcomes. However, if used alone, it does not tell us which specific procedures require change in order to resolve potential problems. This study proposes, and tests, a methodology which combines general measures of procedural justice with measures of perceptions of specific procedures in order to diagnose problems with organizational outcomes. This is tested in two call centers. The research design employs a survey of randomly selected employees from the call centers. The effects of a general measure of procedural justice on the organizational outcomes of turnover intentions and organizational commitment are examined. Further, we examine the effects of attitudes towards specific monitoring procedures on a general measure of procedural justice. Baron and Kenny’s statistical methodology is employed to test these relationships; to show that procedural justice mediates the effect of employee perceptions of monitoring on turnover intentions and organizational commitment. Our findings support complete mediation effects. The implications of these findings are that general perceptions of procedural justice can be used to screen for potential problems with organizational outcomes. If general effects are found, organizations can employ more specific measures of organizational procedures to target procedural problems. The methodology proposed here has the potential to identify specific procedures that organizations can focus on in order to improve organizational outcomes. Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE AR-SA /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; text-align:justify; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;}
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信