马尾综合征的管理:NHS员工在DGH的看法

G. Taylor
{"title":"马尾综合征的管理:NHS员工在DGH的看法","authors":"G. Taylor","doi":"10.23880/jobd-16000199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Cauda Equina Syndrome (CES) is a challenging condition to diagnose due to such variability in clinical features and poor correlation with MRI findings. It requires surgery within hours to avoid damage to the bowel, bladder, sexual organs and lower limbs. There are empirical studies exploring patients’ perspectives of having CES, however, there is no literature to review NHS staff perceptions of managing this neurosurgical emergency. The aim is to explore perceptions of senior clinical staff who commonly manage patients with suspected CES in secondary care within the Emergency Department (ED) and Trauma and Orthopaedics (T&O) to improve the management of CES. The main objective is to identify barriers to successful management and possible solutions to improve care. Methods: A self-administered non-validated questionnaire was designed to identify barriers experienced and potential solutions. In addition, a Nominal Group Technique (NGT) was used to gain a greater insight. The qualitative data obtained was analysed by thematic analysis. Results: The questionnaire generated a 73% response rate. Six senior clinicians attended the NGT with representation from the three clinical specialities; ED, T&O and Advanced Physiotherapy Practitioner (APP). The challenges and potential solutions were categorised into themes and subthemes. The barriers highlighted included; staff confidence in clinical diagnosis; fear of litigation and inter-professional relations; patient psychosocial factors, expectations and comorbidities; lack of agreed local pathway. The solutions raised include; staff training; standardising local/national pathway; access to daily Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) slots. Conclusion: Patient safety and accurate diagnosis of CES is at the forefront of decision-making despite organisation barriers and limitations of existing pathways. A shift away from admission to expedite an urgent MRI requires a change to traditional clinical practice and expectations. In times of rising pressures and financial constraints, collaborative working is essential to implement and sustain the required changes highlighted in this study.","PeriodicalId":447832,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedics & Bone Disorders","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management of Cauda Equina Syndrome: NHS Staff Perceptions in a DGH\",\"authors\":\"G. Taylor\",\"doi\":\"10.23880/jobd-16000199\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: Cauda Equina Syndrome (CES) is a challenging condition to diagnose due to such variability in clinical features and poor correlation with MRI findings. It requires surgery within hours to avoid damage to the bowel, bladder, sexual organs and lower limbs. There are empirical studies exploring patients’ perspectives of having CES, however, there is no literature to review NHS staff perceptions of managing this neurosurgical emergency. The aim is to explore perceptions of senior clinical staff who commonly manage patients with suspected CES in secondary care within the Emergency Department (ED) and Trauma and Orthopaedics (T&O) to improve the management of CES. The main objective is to identify barriers to successful management and possible solutions to improve care. Methods: A self-administered non-validated questionnaire was designed to identify barriers experienced and potential solutions. In addition, a Nominal Group Technique (NGT) was used to gain a greater insight. The qualitative data obtained was analysed by thematic analysis. Results: The questionnaire generated a 73% response rate. Six senior clinicians attended the NGT with representation from the three clinical specialities; ED, T&O and Advanced Physiotherapy Practitioner (APP). The challenges and potential solutions were categorised into themes and subthemes. The barriers highlighted included; staff confidence in clinical diagnosis; fear of litigation and inter-professional relations; patient psychosocial factors, expectations and comorbidities; lack of agreed local pathway. The solutions raised include; staff training; standardising local/national pathway; access to daily Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) slots. Conclusion: Patient safety and accurate diagnosis of CES is at the forefront of decision-making despite organisation barriers and limitations of existing pathways. A shift away from admission to expedite an urgent MRI requires a change to traditional clinical practice and expectations. In times of rising pressures and financial constraints, collaborative working is essential to implement and sustain the required changes highlighted in this study.\",\"PeriodicalId\":447832,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedics & Bone Disorders\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedics & Bone Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23880/jobd-16000199\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedics & Bone Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23880/jobd-16000199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:马尾综合征(CES)是一种具有挑战性的疾病,由于其临床特征的多变性和与MRI表现的相关性较差。它需要在几个小时内进行手术,以避免对肠道、膀胱、性器官和下肢造成损害。有实证研究探索患者对CES的看法,然而,没有文献回顾NHS工作人员对管理这种神经外科急诊的看法。目的是探讨在急诊科(ED)和创伤骨科(T&O)的二级护理中通常管理疑似CES患者的高级临床工作人员对改善CES管理的看法。主要目标是确定成功管理的障碍和改善护理的可能解决方案。方法:设计一份自我管理的非验证问卷,以确定所经历的障碍和可能的解决方案。此外,还使用了标称组技术(NGT)来获得更大的洞察力。对所得定性数据进行专题分析。结果:问卷回复率为73%。来自三个临床专科的六名资深临床医生出席了NGT;ED, T&O和高级理疗师(APP)。挑战和可能的解决办法分为主题和次级主题。强调的障碍包括;员工对临床诊断的信心;害怕诉讼和跨专业关系;患者心理社会因素、期望和合并症;缺乏商定的当地途径。提出的解决方案包括;员工培训;标准化本地/全国路径;获得每日磁共振成像(MRI)插槽。结论:尽管存在组织障碍和现有途径的局限性,但患者安全和准确诊断是决策的前沿。从入院到紧急MRI的转变需要改变传统的临床实践和期望。在不断增加的压力和财政限制下,协作工作对于实施和维持本研究中强调的所需变化至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Management of Cauda Equina Syndrome: NHS Staff Perceptions in a DGH
Objective: Cauda Equina Syndrome (CES) is a challenging condition to diagnose due to such variability in clinical features and poor correlation with MRI findings. It requires surgery within hours to avoid damage to the bowel, bladder, sexual organs and lower limbs. There are empirical studies exploring patients’ perspectives of having CES, however, there is no literature to review NHS staff perceptions of managing this neurosurgical emergency. The aim is to explore perceptions of senior clinical staff who commonly manage patients with suspected CES in secondary care within the Emergency Department (ED) and Trauma and Orthopaedics (T&O) to improve the management of CES. The main objective is to identify barriers to successful management and possible solutions to improve care. Methods: A self-administered non-validated questionnaire was designed to identify barriers experienced and potential solutions. In addition, a Nominal Group Technique (NGT) was used to gain a greater insight. The qualitative data obtained was analysed by thematic analysis. Results: The questionnaire generated a 73% response rate. Six senior clinicians attended the NGT with representation from the three clinical specialities; ED, T&O and Advanced Physiotherapy Practitioner (APP). The challenges and potential solutions were categorised into themes and subthemes. The barriers highlighted included; staff confidence in clinical diagnosis; fear of litigation and inter-professional relations; patient psychosocial factors, expectations and comorbidities; lack of agreed local pathway. The solutions raised include; staff training; standardising local/national pathway; access to daily Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) slots. Conclusion: Patient safety and accurate diagnosis of CES is at the forefront of decision-making despite organisation barriers and limitations of existing pathways. A shift away from admission to expedite an urgent MRI requires a change to traditional clinical practice and expectations. In times of rising pressures and financial constraints, collaborative working is essential to implement and sustain the required changes highlighted in this study.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信