美德能被教导吗?

D. Clay
{"title":"美德能被教导吗?","authors":"D. Clay","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv22jns5h.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As I write this, another academic year looms ahead. Instead of sleeping late, taking naps, going to the gym, and travelling, I'm now spending my time on creating welcome letters, updating supply lists, adjusting assignment sheets, and answering emails from parents who want to ensure that their \"little darlings\" are adequately prepared for their first foray into PEP. I've taught long enough so that if all I did was change the dates of the assignment sheets from previous years, I would have coherent lesson plans for each class, and nobody would ever know the difference. A decade is a long time to teach the same class with the same books. It's almost as long as my students have been alive! But this begs the question: Why? Why assign readings from texts that are three thousand years old? Why assign weekly study questions on the reading material? What's the point of writing essays, taking tests, or even coming together for class? Certainly, the writers at Spark Notes have done an adequate job of summarizing the texts we read, performing literary analyses, and bringing out the important themes of the texts that we read. Perhaps they do a better job than any of us will. So, what is it that brings us together each class day to discuss these texts? Surely people have read these texts and mined the depths of them over the last millennia so that we have nothing to add that has not already been written by someone else.","PeriodicalId":151352,"journal":{"name":"Moral Literacy","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can Virtue Be Taught?\",\"authors\":\"D. Clay\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/j.ctv22jns5h.8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As I write this, another academic year looms ahead. Instead of sleeping late, taking naps, going to the gym, and travelling, I'm now spending my time on creating welcome letters, updating supply lists, adjusting assignment sheets, and answering emails from parents who want to ensure that their \\\"little darlings\\\" are adequately prepared for their first foray into PEP. I've taught long enough so that if all I did was change the dates of the assignment sheets from previous years, I would have coherent lesson plans for each class, and nobody would ever know the difference. A decade is a long time to teach the same class with the same books. It's almost as long as my students have been alive! But this begs the question: Why? Why assign readings from texts that are three thousand years old? Why assign weekly study questions on the reading material? What's the point of writing essays, taking tests, or even coming together for class? Certainly, the writers at Spark Notes have done an adequate job of summarizing the texts we read, performing literary analyses, and bringing out the important themes of the texts that we read. Perhaps they do a better job than any of us will. So, what is it that brings us together each class day to discuss these texts? Surely people have read these texts and mined the depths of them over the last millennia so that we have nothing to add that has not already been written by someone else.\",\"PeriodicalId\":151352,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Moral Literacy\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Moral Literacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv22jns5h.8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Moral Literacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv22jns5h.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在我写这篇文章的时候,又一个学年即将来临。现在,我不再睡懒觉、小睡、去健身房和旅行,而是把时间花在写欢迎信、更新用品清单、调整作业表和回复家长的电子邮件上,他们希望确保他们的“小宝贝”为他们第一次进入PEP做好充分的准备。我教了很长时间的书,所以如果我所做的只是更改往年作业表的日期,我就会为每节课制定连贯的课程计划,而且没有人会知道其中的区别。用同样的书教同样的课,十年是很长的一段时间。这几乎和我的学生们活着的时间一样长!但这引出了一个问题:为什么?为什么要指定阅读三千年前的文本呢?为什么每周要布置关于阅读材料的学习问题?写论文,参加考试,甚至一起上课有什么意义?当然,Spark Notes的作者在总结我们所阅读的文本、进行文学分析和提出我们所阅读的文本的重要主题方面做了充分的工作。也许他们比我们任何人都做得更好。那么,是什么让我们在每个上课日聚在一起讨论这些课文呢?当然,在过去的几千年里,人们已经阅读了这些文本,并对它们进行了深入的挖掘,所以我们没有什么可以补充的,这些都是别人已经写过的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Can Virtue Be Taught?
As I write this, another academic year looms ahead. Instead of sleeping late, taking naps, going to the gym, and travelling, I'm now spending my time on creating welcome letters, updating supply lists, adjusting assignment sheets, and answering emails from parents who want to ensure that their "little darlings" are adequately prepared for their first foray into PEP. I've taught long enough so that if all I did was change the dates of the assignment sheets from previous years, I would have coherent lesson plans for each class, and nobody would ever know the difference. A decade is a long time to teach the same class with the same books. It's almost as long as my students have been alive! But this begs the question: Why? Why assign readings from texts that are three thousand years old? Why assign weekly study questions on the reading material? What's the point of writing essays, taking tests, or even coming together for class? Certainly, the writers at Spark Notes have done an adequate job of summarizing the texts we read, performing literary analyses, and bringing out the important themes of the texts that we read. Perhaps they do a better job than any of us will. So, what is it that brings us together each class day to discuss these texts? Surely people have read these texts and mined the depths of them over the last millennia so that we have nothing to add that has not already been written by someone else.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信