操作松弛模型:有限注意力的短期、中期和长期后果

P. Iliev, I. Welch
{"title":"操作松弛模型:有限注意力的短期、中期和长期后果","authors":"P. Iliev, I. Welch","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.954150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper studies institutions, such as firms, in which multiple projects can require attention at unpredictable times. Firms respond optimally by limiting the number of projects they simultaneously undertake (medium-term) and by acquiring attention capacity (long-term). The most interesting implications relate to a variable that would otherwise be interpreted as the sign of an agency conflict: idleness (operational slack). In our full-information model, it is optimal for the institution to be idle some of the time. In the medium-term and long-term, when firms respond optimally, they tend to idle *more* when projects require \"more\" attention and when they have \"less\" attention capacity. Moreover, natural model extensions suggest that managers who want to signal higher quality or who are overly optimistic take on too many projects. This can explain overinvestment and the diversification discount even when managers are not agency-conflicted.","PeriodicalId":434407,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Finance Theory","volume":"96 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Model of Operational Slack: The Short-Run, Medium-Run, and Long-Run Consequences of Limited Attention\",\"authors\":\"P. Iliev, I. Welch\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.954150\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper studies institutions, such as firms, in which multiple projects can require attention at unpredictable times. Firms respond optimally by limiting the number of projects they simultaneously undertake (medium-term) and by acquiring attention capacity (long-term). The most interesting implications relate to a variable that would otherwise be interpreted as the sign of an agency conflict: idleness (operational slack). In our full-information model, it is optimal for the institution to be idle some of the time. In the medium-term and long-term, when firms respond optimally, they tend to idle *more* when projects require \\\"more\\\" attention and when they have \\\"less\\\" attention capacity. Moreover, natural model extensions suggest that managers who want to signal higher quality or who are overly optimistic take on too many projects. This can explain overinvestment and the diversification discount even when managers are not agency-conflicted.\",\"PeriodicalId\":434407,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Corporate Finance Theory\",\"volume\":\"96 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Corporate Finance Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.954150\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Finance Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.954150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文研究的机构,如公司,其中多个项目可能需要在不可预测的时间关注。公司通过限制他们同时承担的项目数量(中期)和获得注意力能力(长期)来做出最佳反应。最有趣的含义与一个变量有关,否则它将被解释为代理冲突的迹象:闲置(操作懈怠)。在我们的全信息模型中,机构在某些时候处于空闲状态是最优的。从中期和长期来看,当公司做出最佳反应时,当项目需要“更多”关注而他们的关注能力“更少”时,他们往往会“更多”闲置。此外,自然的模型扩展表明,那些想要提高质量或过于乐观的经理承担了太多的项目。这可以解释过度投资和多元化折扣,即使经理们没有代理冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Model of Operational Slack: The Short-Run, Medium-Run, and Long-Run Consequences of Limited Attention
This paper studies institutions, such as firms, in which multiple projects can require attention at unpredictable times. Firms respond optimally by limiting the number of projects they simultaneously undertake (medium-term) and by acquiring attention capacity (long-term). The most interesting implications relate to a variable that would otherwise be interpreted as the sign of an agency conflict: idleness (operational slack). In our full-information model, it is optimal for the institution to be idle some of the time. In the medium-term and long-term, when firms respond optimally, they tend to idle *more* when projects require "more" attention and when they have "less" attention capacity. Moreover, natural model extensions suggest that managers who want to signal higher quality or who are overly optimistic take on too many projects. This can explain overinvestment and the diversification discount even when managers are not agency-conflicted.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信