质量与人在具体情况下的发展方法

S. Young, Sharon McDonald, H. Edwards, J. B. Thompson
{"title":"质量与人在具体情况下的发展方法","authors":"S. Young, Sharon McDonald, H. Edwards, J. B. Thompson","doi":"10.1109/APAQS.2001.990020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is argued that personality testing and group dynamic principles could improve the success of development teams in developing systems by providing a mechanism for repeatable and valid identification, rating and selection of stakeholders in the method engineering process. The method presented, MEWSIC, aims to formalise the development of situational methods so that the link to quality assurance processes are retained. MEWSIC accounts for the number of stakeholders who have a legitimate interest in the success of the project, but distinguishes between those who provide input that informs the method engineering process, those who carry out this process and their team role types. An overview of MEWSIC and a discussion on the need for personality testing and group dynamic measures is given.","PeriodicalId":145151,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings Second Asia-Pacific Conference on Quality Software","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality and people in the development of situationally specific methods\",\"authors\":\"S. Young, Sharon McDonald, H. Edwards, J. B. Thompson\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/APAQS.2001.990020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is argued that personality testing and group dynamic principles could improve the success of development teams in developing systems by providing a mechanism for repeatable and valid identification, rating and selection of stakeholders in the method engineering process. The method presented, MEWSIC, aims to formalise the development of situational methods so that the link to quality assurance processes are retained. MEWSIC accounts for the number of stakeholders who have a legitimate interest in the success of the project, but distinguishes between those who provide input that informs the method engineering process, those who carry out this process and their team role types. An overview of MEWSIC and a discussion on the need for personality testing and group dynamic measures is given.\",\"PeriodicalId\":145151,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings Second Asia-Pacific Conference on Quality Software\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings Second Asia-Pacific Conference on Quality Software\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/APAQS.2001.990020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings Second Asia-Pacific Conference on Quality Software","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/APAQS.2001.990020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

通过在方法工程过程中提供一种可重复的有效识别、评价和选择利益相关者的机制,人格测试和群体动态原则可以提高开发团队在开发系统中的成功程度。所提出的方法MEWSIC旨在使情景方法的发展正规化,以便保留与质量保证过程的联系。MEWSIC说明了对项目的成功有合法利益的涉众的数量,但是区分了那些提供通知方法工程过程的输入的涉众、那些执行该过程的涉众以及他们的团队角色类型。本文对MEWSIC进行了概述,并对人格测试和群体动态测量的必要性进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quality and people in the development of situationally specific methods
It is argued that personality testing and group dynamic principles could improve the success of development teams in developing systems by providing a mechanism for repeatable and valid identification, rating and selection of stakeholders in the method engineering process. The method presented, MEWSIC, aims to formalise the development of situational methods so that the link to quality assurance processes are retained. MEWSIC accounts for the number of stakeholders who have a legitimate interest in the success of the project, but distinguishes between those who provide input that informs the method engineering process, those who carry out this process and their team role types. An overview of MEWSIC and a discussion on the need for personality testing and group dynamic measures is given.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信