资本市场能识别财务虚假陈述吗?-基本价值和市场分析

Ingolf Kloppenburg
{"title":"资本市场能识别财务虚假陈述吗?-基本价值和市场分析","authors":"Ingolf Kloppenburg","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3926293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The efficiency of a (capital) market is a key element in economics (e.g. Marshall 2009; Mankiw 2014). This paper attempts to shed more light into the market efficiency in case of the rare event of a deliberate violation of GAAP (misrepresentation). The aim of the paper is twofold. The first aim is to determine the amount by which misrepresented firms are overvalued due to the misrepresentation. I therefore compare the actual firm value with hypothetical firm value based on the fundamental value of the firm without the misrepresentation. The latter is calculated with conventional valuation methods. The second aim is to compare the value difference with the market reaction once the misrepresentation emerges to test market efficiency. The firm value difference is then compared with the market reaction around the date when the misrepresentation gets revealed to the public e.g. with a restatement announcement. The method is thereby an OLS-regression. The analysis bases on a dataset of misrepresenting firms detected by the US Securities and Exchange Commission (AAER cases). Results indicate a substantially higher market value due to the misrepresentation depending on the method of an average value of up to 29.6% and median values ranging from 1.6% to 17.6%. Moreover, results indicate that the market reaction once the misrepresentation is revealed is independent of the value difference. The results are robust for the valuation method and market reaction horizon. My interpretation is that the results provide statistical and economical evidence of an anomaly of the market efficiency hypothesis.","PeriodicalId":260048,"journal":{"name":"Capital Markets: Market Efficiency eJournal","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does the Capital Market Recognize Financial Misrepresentations? – Fundamental Value and Market Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Ingolf Kloppenburg\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3926293\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The efficiency of a (capital) market is a key element in economics (e.g. Marshall 2009; Mankiw 2014). This paper attempts to shed more light into the market efficiency in case of the rare event of a deliberate violation of GAAP (misrepresentation). The aim of the paper is twofold. The first aim is to determine the amount by which misrepresented firms are overvalued due to the misrepresentation. I therefore compare the actual firm value with hypothetical firm value based on the fundamental value of the firm without the misrepresentation. The latter is calculated with conventional valuation methods. The second aim is to compare the value difference with the market reaction once the misrepresentation emerges to test market efficiency. The firm value difference is then compared with the market reaction around the date when the misrepresentation gets revealed to the public e.g. with a restatement announcement. The method is thereby an OLS-regression. The analysis bases on a dataset of misrepresenting firms detected by the US Securities and Exchange Commission (AAER cases). Results indicate a substantially higher market value due to the misrepresentation depending on the method of an average value of up to 29.6% and median values ranging from 1.6% to 17.6%. Moreover, results indicate that the market reaction once the misrepresentation is revealed is independent of the value difference. The results are robust for the valuation method and market reaction horizon. My interpretation is that the results provide statistical and economical evidence of an anomaly of the market efficiency hypothesis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":260048,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Capital Markets: Market Efficiency eJournal\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Capital Markets: Market Efficiency eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3926293\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Capital Markets: Market Efficiency eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3926293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

(资本)市场的效率是经济学中的一个关键因素(例如Marshall 2009;曼昆2014)。本文试图在故意违反公认会计准则(失实陈述)的罕见事件的情况下,更多地揭示市场效率。这篇论文的目的是双重的。第一个目标是确定被虚假陈述的公司因虚假陈述而被高估的金额。因此,我将实际的企业价值与假设的企业价值进行比较,假设的企业价值基于企业的基本价值,而不存在虚假陈述。后者是用传统的估价方法计算的。第二个目的是比较价值差异与市场反应一旦虚假陈述出现,以检验市场效率。然后,将公司价值差异与虚假陈述向公众披露(例如通过重述公告)前后的市场反应进行比较。因此,该方法是ols回归。该分析基于美国证券交易委员会(AAER)发现的虚假陈述公司数据集。结果表明,根据平均值高达29.6%和中位数范围为1.6%至17.6%的方法,由于虚假陈述,市场价值大幅提高。此外,研究结果还表明,一旦发现虚假陈述,市场的反应与价值差异无关。研究结果对估值方法和市场反应视界具有鲁棒性。我的解释是,这些结果为市场效率假说的异常提供了统计和经济证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does the Capital Market Recognize Financial Misrepresentations? – Fundamental Value and Market Analysis
The efficiency of a (capital) market is a key element in economics (e.g. Marshall 2009; Mankiw 2014). This paper attempts to shed more light into the market efficiency in case of the rare event of a deliberate violation of GAAP (misrepresentation). The aim of the paper is twofold. The first aim is to determine the amount by which misrepresented firms are overvalued due to the misrepresentation. I therefore compare the actual firm value with hypothetical firm value based on the fundamental value of the firm without the misrepresentation. The latter is calculated with conventional valuation methods. The second aim is to compare the value difference with the market reaction once the misrepresentation emerges to test market efficiency. The firm value difference is then compared with the market reaction around the date when the misrepresentation gets revealed to the public e.g. with a restatement announcement. The method is thereby an OLS-regression. The analysis bases on a dataset of misrepresenting firms detected by the US Securities and Exchange Commission (AAER cases). Results indicate a substantially higher market value due to the misrepresentation depending on the method of an average value of up to 29.6% and median values ranging from 1.6% to 17.6%. Moreover, results indicate that the market reaction once the misrepresentation is revealed is independent of the value difference. The results are robust for the valuation method and market reaction horizon. My interpretation is that the results provide statistical and economical evidence of an anomaly of the market efficiency hypothesis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信