在制度分散的环境中管理复杂的交通基础设施项目

M. Leijten, J. Koppenjan, E. ten Heuvelhof, W. Veeneman
{"title":"在制度分散的环境中管理复杂的交通基础设施项目","authors":"M. Leijten, J. Koppenjan, E. ten Heuvelhof, W. Veeneman","doi":"10.1109/INFRA.2008.5439623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Complex construction projects face a dilemma: perspectives and interests of clients and project managers may diverge and even be contradictive. This dilemma is especially manifest in the management of the performance benchmarks time, cost, scope and quality. Administrators hold to pre-established benchmarks, while project managers have an interest in relaxing them, in order to be able to realize the project. When these two contradictory interests are not reconsolidated, either the benchmarks are not met, or they will be traded off in an uncontrolled way, which even may lead to project failure. This management trap is best to be avoided when designing the contract between client and contractors and the drawing up of the terms of reference. Due to the complexity that characterizes a lot of public projects, this is not always possible. With RandstadRail as example, we will show in this paper what problems may occur in these situations and how they can be dealt with.","PeriodicalId":207041,"journal":{"name":"2008 First International Conference on Infrastructure Systems and Services: Building Networks for a Brighter Future (INFRA)","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Managing complex transport infrastructure projects in an institutionally fragmented setting\",\"authors\":\"M. Leijten, J. Koppenjan, E. ten Heuvelhof, W. Veeneman\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/INFRA.2008.5439623\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Complex construction projects face a dilemma: perspectives and interests of clients and project managers may diverge and even be contradictive. This dilemma is especially manifest in the management of the performance benchmarks time, cost, scope and quality. Administrators hold to pre-established benchmarks, while project managers have an interest in relaxing them, in order to be able to realize the project. When these two contradictory interests are not reconsolidated, either the benchmarks are not met, or they will be traded off in an uncontrolled way, which even may lead to project failure. This management trap is best to be avoided when designing the contract between client and contractors and the drawing up of the terms of reference. Due to the complexity that characterizes a lot of public projects, this is not always possible. With RandstadRail as example, we will show in this paper what problems may occur in these situations and how they can be dealt with.\",\"PeriodicalId\":207041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2008 First International Conference on Infrastructure Systems and Services: Building Networks for a Brighter Future (INFRA)\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2008 First International Conference on Infrastructure Systems and Services: Building Networks for a Brighter Future (INFRA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/INFRA.2008.5439623\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 First International Conference on Infrastructure Systems and Services: Building Networks for a Brighter Future (INFRA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/INFRA.2008.5439623","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

复杂的建设项目面临着一个困境:客户和项目经理的观点和利益可能会出现分歧,甚至是矛盾。这种困境在性能基准——时间、成本、范围和质量的管理中尤为明显。管理员坚持预先建立的基准,而项目经理则有兴趣放松这些基准,以便能够实现项目。当这两种相互矛盾的利益没有得到重新整合时,要么没有达到基准,要么以一种不受控制的方式进行交易,这甚至可能导致项目失败。在设计客户与承建商之间的合约及草拟职权范围时,最好避免这种管理陷阱。由于许多公共项目的复杂性,这并不总是可能的。以RandstadRail为例,我们将在本文中展示在这些情况下可能发生的问题以及如何处理这些问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Managing complex transport infrastructure projects in an institutionally fragmented setting
Complex construction projects face a dilemma: perspectives and interests of clients and project managers may diverge and even be contradictive. This dilemma is especially manifest in the management of the performance benchmarks time, cost, scope and quality. Administrators hold to pre-established benchmarks, while project managers have an interest in relaxing them, in order to be able to realize the project. When these two contradictory interests are not reconsolidated, either the benchmarks are not met, or they will be traded off in an uncontrolled way, which even may lead to project failure. This management trap is best to be avoided when designing the contract between client and contractors and the drawing up of the terms of reference. Due to the complexity that characterizes a lot of public projects, this is not always possible. With RandstadRail as example, we will show in this paper what problems may occur in these situations and how they can be dealt with.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信