组织能力和环境动态性对首次行动影响的实证研究

Vera L. Street, H. Marble, Marc D. Street
{"title":"组织能力和环境动态性对首次行动影响的实证研究","authors":"Vera L. Street, H. Marble, Marc D. Street","doi":"10.5465/AMBPP.2007.26530768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sustained performance advantages are rare in business (Wiggins and Ruefli, 2002). Nevertheless, firm managers are constantly faced with the challenge of trying to attain this elusive goal. Thus, it is not surprising that an important aim of strategic management researchers is to better understand how firms attain superior firm performance (Hoskisson et al., 1999). Firms adopting a \"first-mover\" strategy may be able to secure sustainable performance advantages (Lieberman and Montgomery, 1998). The term \"first moves\" (or \"pioneering moves\") can mean organizational efforts to create new markets through the introduction of new products or services; it can also refer to entry into new markets, or the development and implementation of new work processes (Kerin et al., 1992). Firms may benefit from adopting such strategies. For instance, Lieberman and Montgomery (1988) indicate three sources of advantage available to first movers so that they can outperform the competition. First, technological leadership allows for outperformance because a first mover is able to develop expertise from their leading edge research, development, and other similar activities (Cho et al., 1998). Additionally, preemption of assets, obtaining valuable assets or positioning space before others enter the market (Kerin et al., 1992; Lieberman and Montgomery, 1988) allows a competitive edge. Third, first movers are able to influence buyer behavior in that they provide the initial learning experience about a product/service for the consumer (Dos Santos and Peffers, 1995). As such, first-mover advantages have been an important area of study for strategy scholars. This is not to say, however, that there are no risks or costs associated with first moving. Indeed, scholars have argued that there is no conclusive evidence to support the existence of a first-mover advantage (see discussions by Kerin el al., 1992; Xie, 2003). It is likely first moves can be advantageous, but these advantages are not a given. Advantages from first moving are more likely to be gained when certain firm and environmental conditions exist (e.g., Lieberman and Montgomery, 1998). Though some research does highlight the importance of specific internal characteristics and first moves (e.g., Szymanski et al., 1995) and others have also included external contingencies (e.g., Covin et al., 2000), the exact nature of the relationships among internal organizational characteristics, first moves, and firm performance remains elusive (Lieberman and Montgomery, 1998; VanderWerf and Mahon, 1997). The resource-based view (RBV) can help one to better understand these relationships (Lieberman and Montgomery, 1998). The RBV is characterized by the assertion that a firm creates value through its network of resources (Black and Boal, 1994; Conner, 1991; Madhok, 1996). Firms outperform their competitors by leveraging these resources. As such, it is important to understand how these resources are acquired or built (e.g., Dierickx and Cool, 1989). Lieberman and Montgomery (1998) contend that the aforementioned sources of advantage resulting from first moves are indeed resources of the firm. In their model, Street el al. (2010) show how elements of organizational capacity aid first movers in building these resources that lead to superior performance. Based on this model, the effect of those elements of organizational capacity on the first move-performance relationship is tested here. Additionally, the influence of environmental dynamism on this moderated relationship is tested as well. To do so, first moves in five industries are identified. Then, stock prices of firms are analyzed to see if the firms' first moves result in positive stock reactions. Next, the effect of the level of a first mover's organizational capacity on this stock price reaction, as well as how environmental dynamism influences this effect are tested. This paper contributes to strategic management literature in that the results help us learn more about the nature of the first-move performance relationship and its contingencies. …","PeriodicalId":228014,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Managerial Issues","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Empirical Investigation of the Influence of Organizational Capacity and Environmental Dynamism on First Moves\",\"authors\":\"Vera L. Street, H. Marble, Marc D. Street\",\"doi\":\"10.5465/AMBPP.2007.26530768\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Sustained performance advantages are rare in business (Wiggins and Ruefli, 2002). Nevertheless, firm managers are constantly faced with the challenge of trying to attain this elusive goal. Thus, it is not surprising that an important aim of strategic management researchers is to better understand how firms attain superior firm performance (Hoskisson et al., 1999). Firms adopting a \\\"first-mover\\\" strategy may be able to secure sustainable performance advantages (Lieberman and Montgomery, 1998). The term \\\"first moves\\\" (or \\\"pioneering moves\\\") can mean organizational efforts to create new markets through the introduction of new products or services; it can also refer to entry into new markets, or the development and implementation of new work processes (Kerin et al., 1992). Firms may benefit from adopting such strategies. For instance, Lieberman and Montgomery (1988) indicate three sources of advantage available to first movers so that they can outperform the competition. First, technological leadership allows for outperformance because a first mover is able to develop expertise from their leading edge research, development, and other similar activities (Cho et al., 1998). Additionally, preemption of assets, obtaining valuable assets or positioning space before others enter the market (Kerin et al., 1992; Lieberman and Montgomery, 1988) allows a competitive edge. Third, first movers are able to influence buyer behavior in that they provide the initial learning experience about a product/service for the consumer (Dos Santos and Peffers, 1995). As such, first-mover advantages have been an important area of study for strategy scholars. This is not to say, however, that there are no risks or costs associated with first moving. Indeed, scholars have argued that there is no conclusive evidence to support the existence of a first-mover advantage (see discussions by Kerin el al., 1992; Xie, 2003). It is likely first moves can be advantageous, but these advantages are not a given. Advantages from first moving are more likely to be gained when certain firm and environmental conditions exist (e.g., Lieberman and Montgomery, 1998). Though some research does highlight the importance of specific internal characteristics and first moves (e.g., Szymanski et al., 1995) and others have also included external contingencies (e.g., Covin et al., 2000), the exact nature of the relationships among internal organizational characteristics, first moves, and firm performance remains elusive (Lieberman and Montgomery, 1998; VanderWerf and Mahon, 1997). The resource-based view (RBV) can help one to better understand these relationships (Lieberman and Montgomery, 1998). The RBV is characterized by the assertion that a firm creates value through its network of resources (Black and Boal, 1994; Conner, 1991; Madhok, 1996). Firms outperform their competitors by leveraging these resources. As such, it is important to understand how these resources are acquired or built (e.g., Dierickx and Cool, 1989). Lieberman and Montgomery (1998) contend that the aforementioned sources of advantage resulting from first moves are indeed resources of the firm. In their model, Street el al. (2010) show how elements of organizational capacity aid first movers in building these resources that lead to superior performance. Based on this model, the effect of those elements of organizational capacity on the first move-performance relationship is tested here. Additionally, the influence of environmental dynamism on this moderated relationship is tested as well. To do so, first moves in five industries are identified. Then, stock prices of firms are analyzed to see if the firms' first moves result in positive stock reactions. Next, the effect of the level of a first mover's organizational capacity on this stock price reaction, as well as how environmental dynamism influences this effect are tested. This paper contributes to strategic management literature in that the results help us learn more about the nature of the first-move performance relationship and its contingencies. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":228014,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Managerial Issues\",\"volume\":\"62 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Managerial Issues\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2007.26530768\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Managerial Issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2007.26530768","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

持续的绩效优势在商业中是罕见的(Wiggins和Ruefli, 2002)。然而,企业管理人员不断面临着努力实现这一难以实现的目标的挑战。因此,毫不奇怪,战略管理研究者的一个重要目标是更好地理解企业如何获得卓越的企业绩效(Hoskisson et al., 1999)。采用“先发”战略的公司可能能够获得可持续的绩效优势(Lieberman和Montgomery, 1998)。术语“第一步”(或“开拓性行动”)可以指通过引入新产品或服务来创造新市场的组织努力;它也可以指进入新市场,或开发和实施新的工作流程(Kerin et al., 1992)。企业可能会从采用这种策略中受益。例如,利伯曼和蒙哥马利(1988)指出,先行者可以获得三种优势来源,使他们能够超越竞争对手。首先,技术领先允许卓越表现,因为先行者能够从他们的前沿研究、开发和其他类似活动中发展专业知识(Cho et al., 1998)。此外,抢占资产,在他人进入市场之前获得有价值的资产或定位空间(Kerin et al., 1992;利伯曼和蒙哥马利,1988)允许竞争优势。第三,先行者能够影响购买者的行为,因为他们为消费者提供了关于产品/服务的初步学习经验(Dos Santos和Peffers, 1995)。因此,先发优势一直是战略学者研究的一个重要领域。然而,这并不是说第一次搬家就没有风险或成本。事实上,学者们认为没有确凿的证据支持先发优势的存在(见Kerin el al., 1992;谢,2003)。第一步很可能是有利的,但这些优势并不是给定的。当特定的企业和环境条件存在时,第一次行动的优势更有可能获得(例如,Lieberman和Montgomery, 1998)。尽管一些研究确实强调了特定的内部特征和第一步的重要性(例如,Szymanski等人,1995),其他研究也包括了外部偶发性(例如,Covin等人,2000),但组织内部特征、第一步和公司绩效之间关系的确切性质仍然难以捉摸(Lieberman和Montgomery, 1998;VanderWerf and Mahon, 1997)。资源基础观点(RBV)可以帮助人们更好地理解这些关系(Lieberman和Montgomery, 1998)。RBV的特点是断言企业通过其资源网络创造价值(Black and Boal, 1994;康纳,1991;Madhok, 1996)。企业通过利用这些资源胜过竞争对手。因此,了解如何获得或构建这些资源是很重要的(例如,Dierickx和Cool, 1989)。Lieberman和Montgomery(1998)认为,前面提到的由第一步产生的优势来源确实是企业的资源。在他们的模型中,Street等人(2010)展示了组织能力的要素如何帮助先行者建立这些资源,从而带来卓越的绩效。在此模型的基础上,本文检验了组织能力要素对首次行动-绩效关系的影响。此外,环境动力对这种调节关系的影响也进行了测试。为此,我们确定了五个行业的第一步。然后,分析公司的股票价格,看看公司的第一次行动是否会导致积极的股票反应。接下来,我们测试了先发者的组织能力水平对股价反应的影响,以及环境动力如何影响这种影响。本文对战略管理文献的贡献在于,研究结果有助于我们更多地了解第一步绩效关系及其附带因素的性质。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Empirical Investigation of the Influence of Organizational Capacity and Environmental Dynamism on First Moves
Sustained performance advantages are rare in business (Wiggins and Ruefli, 2002). Nevertheless, firm managers are constantly faced with the challenge of trying to attain this elusive goal. Thus, it is not surprising that an important aim of strategic management researchers is to better understand how firms attain superior firm performance (Hoskisson et al., 1999). Firms adopting a "first-mover" strategy may be able to secure sustainable performance advantages (Lieberman and Montgomery, 1998). The term "first moves" (or "pioneering moves") can mean organizational efforts to create new markets through the introduction of new products or services; it can also refer to entry into new markets, or the development and implementation of new work processes (Kerin et al., 1992). Firms may benefit from adopting such strategies. For instance, Lieberman and Montgomery (1988) indicate three sources of advantage available to first movers so that they can outperform the competition. First, technological leadership allows for outperformance because a first mover is able to develop expertise from their leading edge research, development, and other similar activities (Cho et al., 1998). Additionally, preemption of assets, obtaining valuable assets or positioning space before others enter the market (Kerin et al., 1992; Lieberman and Montgomery, 1988) allows a competitive edge. Third, first movers are able to influence buyer behavior in that they provide the initial learning experience about a product/service for the consumer (Dos Santos and Peffers, 1995). As such, first-mover advantages have been an important area of study for strategy scholars. This is not to say, however, that there are no risks or costs associated with first moving. Indeed, scholars have argued that there is no conclusive evidence to support the existence of a first-mover advantage (see discussions by Kerin el al., 1992; Xie, 2003). It is likely first moves can be advantageous, but these advantages are not a given. Advantages from first moving are more likely to be gained when certain firm and environmental conditions exist (e.g., Lieberman and Montgomery, 1998). Though some research does highlight the importance of specific internal characteristics and first moves (e.g., Szymanski et al., 1995) and others have also included external contingencies (e.g., Covin et al., 2000), the exact nature of the relationships among internal organizational characteristics, first moves, and firm performance remains elusive (Lieberman and Montgomery, 1998; VanderWerf and Mahon, 1997). The resource-based view (RBV) can help one to better understand these relationships (Lieberman and Montgomery, 1998). The RBV is characterized by the assertion that a firm creates value through its network of resources (Black and Boal, 1994; Conner, 1991; Madhok, 1996). Firms outperform their competitors by leveraging these resources. As such, it is important to understand how these resources are acquired or built (e.g., Dierickx and Cool, 1989). Lieberman and Montgomery (1998) contend that the aforementioned sources of advantage resulting from first moves are indeed resources of the firm. In their model, Street el al. (2010) show how elements of organizational capacity aid first movers in building these resources that lead to superior performance. Based on this model, the effect of those elements of organizational capacity on the first move-performance relationship is tested here. Additionally, the influence of environmental dynamism on this moderated relationship is tested as well. To do so, first moves in five industries are identified. Then, stock prices of firms are analyzed to see if the firms' first moves result in positive stock reactions. Next, the effect of the level of a first mover's organizational capacity on this stock price reaction, as well as how environmental dynamism influences this effect are tested. This paper contributes to strategic management literature in that the results help us learn more about the nature of the first-move performance relationship and its contingencies. …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信