在预先训练的人工神经网络中评估云雷达多普勒光谱对Cloudnet液体检测的云液体检测

H. Kalesse-Los, Willi Schimmel, E. Luke, P. Seifert
{"title":"在预先训练的人工神经网络中评估云雷达多普勒光谱对Cloudnet液体检测的云液体检测","authors":"H. Kalesse-Los, Willi Schimmel, E. Luke, P. Seifert","doi":"10.5194/amt-2021-60","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Detection of liquid-containing cloud layers in thick mixed-phase clouds or multi-layer cloud situations from ground-basedremote sensing instruments still pose observational challenges yet improvements are crucial since the existence of multi-layerliquid layers in mixed-phase cloud situations influences cloud radiative effects, cloud life time, and precipitation formationprocesses. Hydrometeor target classifications such as Cloudnet that require a lidar signal for the classification of liquid arelimited to the maximum height of lidar signal penetration and thus often lead to underestimations of liquid-containing cloudlayers. Here we evaluate the Cloudnet liquid detection against the approach of Luke et al. (2010) which extracts morphologicalfeatures in cloud-penetrating cloud radar Doppler spectra measurements in a artificial neural network (ANN) approach toclassify liquid beyond full lidar signal attenuation based on the simulation of the two lidar parameters particle backscattercoefficient and particle depolarization ratio. We show that the ANN of Luke et al. (2010) which was trained in Arctic conditionscan successfully be applied to observations in the mid-latitudes obtained during the seven-week long ACCEPT field experimentin Cabauw, the Netherlands, 2014. In a sensitivity study covering the whole duration of the ACCEPT campaign, different liquid-detectionthresholds for ANN-predicted lidar variables are applied and evaluated against the Cloudnet target classification.Independent validation of the liquid mask from the standard Cloudnet target classification against the ANN-based techniqueis realized by comparisons to observations of microwave radiometer liquid water path, ceilometer liquid-layer base altitude,and radiosonde relative humidity. Four conclusions were drawn from the investigation: First, it was found that the thresholdselection criteria of liquid-related lidar backscatter and depolarization alone control the liquid detection considerably. Second,nevertheless, all threshold values used in the ANN-framework were found to outperform the Cloudnet target classification fordeep or multi-layer cloud situations where the lidar signal is fully attenuated within low liquid layers and the cloud reflectivityin higher cloud layers was sufficiently high to be detectable by the cloud radar. Third, in convective situations for whichlidar data is available and for which the imprint of cloud microphysics on the radar Doppler spectrum is decreased, Cloudnetoutperforms the ANN retrieval. Fourth, in high-level clouds both approaches (Cloudnet and the ANN technique), are limited.\n","PeriodicalId":441110,"journal":{"name":"Atmospheric Measurement Techniques Discussions","volume":"102 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating cloud liquid detection using cloud radar Doppler spectra in a pre-trained artificial neural network against Cloudnet liquid detection\",\"authors\":\"H. Kalesse-Los, Willi Schimmel, E. Luke, P. Seifert\",\"doi\":\"10.5194/amt-2021-60\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract. Detection of liquid-containing cloud layers in thick mixed-phase clouds or multi-layer cloud situations from ground-basedremote sensing instruments still pose observational challenges yet improvements are crucial since the existence of multi-layerliquid layers in mixed-phase cloud situations influences cloud radiative effects, cloud life time, and precipitation formationprocesses. Hydrometeor target classifications such as Cloudnet that require a lidar signal for the classification of liquid arelimited to the maximum height of lidar signal penetration and thus often lead to underestimations of liquid-containing cloudlayers. Here we evaluate the Cloudnet liquid detection against the approach of Luke et al. (2010) which extracts morphologicalfeatures in cloud-penetrating cloud radar Doppler spectra measurements in a artificial neural network (ANN) approach toclassify liquid beyond full lidar signal attenuation based on the simulation of the two lidar parameters particle backscattercoefficient and particle depolarization ratio. We show that the ANN of Luke et al. (2010) which was trained in Arctic conditionscan successfully be applied to observations in the mid-latitudes obtained during the seven-week long ACCEPT field experimentin Cabauw, the Netherlands, 2014. In a sensitivity study covering the whole duration of the ACCEPT campaign, different liquid-detectionthresholds for ANN-predicted lidar variables are applied and evaluated against the Cloudnet target classification.Independent validation of the liquid mask from the standard Cloudnet target classification against the ANN-based techniqueis realized by comparisons to observations of microwave radiometer liquid water path, ceilometer liquid-layer base altitude,and radiosonde relative humidity. Four conclusions were drawn from the investigation: First, it was found that the thresholdselection criteria of liquid-related lidar backscatter and depolarization alone control the liquid detection considerably. Second,nevertheless, all threshold values used in the ANN-framework were found to outperform the Cloudnet target classification fordeep or multi-layer cloud situations where the lidar signal is fully attenuated within low liquid layers and the cloud reflectivityin higher cloud layers was sufficiently high to be detectable by the cloud radar. Third, in convective situations for whichlidar data is available and for which the imprint of cloud microphysics on the radar Doppler spectrum is decreased, Cloudnetoutperforms the ANN retrieval. Fourth, in high-level clouds both approaches (Cloudnet and the ANN technique), are limited.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":441110,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Atmospheric Measurement Techniques Discussions\",\"volume\":\"102 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Atmospheric Measurement Techniques Discussions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2021-60\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atmospheric Measurement Techniques Discussions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2021-60","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要从地面遥感仪器探测厚混合相云或多层云情况下的含液云层仍然存在观测挑战,但改进是至关重要的,因为混合相云情况下多层液体层的存在会影响云的辐射效应、云的寿命和降水形成过程。像Cloudnet这样需要激光雷达信号来对液体进行分类的水流星目标分类受限于激光雷达信号穿透的最大高度,因此经常导致对含液体云层的低估。在这里,我们对比Luke等人(2010)的方法来评估Cloudnet液体检测,Luke等人(2010)在人工神经网络(ANN)方法中提取云穿透云雷达多普勒光谱测量中的形态特征,基于两个激光雷达参数粒子背散射系数和粒子退极化比的模拟,对完全激光雷达信号衰减之外的液体进行分类。研究表明,Luke等人(2010)在北极条件下训练的人工神经网络可以成功应用于2014年荷兰Cabauw进行的为期七周的ACCEPT野外实验中获得的中纬度观测数据。在一项涵盖ACCEPT活动整个持续时间的敏感性研究中,针对Cloudnet目标分类,应用并评估了人工神经网络预测的激光雷达变量的不同液体检测阈值。通过与微波辐射计液态水路径、ceilometer液态层基本高度和探空仪相对湿度的观测结果进行比较,实现了基于标准Cloudnet目标分类的液体掩膜与基于人工神经网络的技术的独立验证。研究得出以下四个结论:第一,发现仅液体相关激光雷达的后向散射和去极化阈值选择标准对液体检测具有较大的控制作用。其次,尽管如此,我们发现人工神经网络框架中使用的所有阈值在深层或多层云情况下都优于Cloudnet目标分类,在这种情况下,激光雷达信号在低层液体层内完全衰减,而高层云层中的云反射率足够高,可以被云雷达探测到。第三,在可获得激光雷达数据的对流情况下,云微物理在雷达多普勒频谱上的印记减少,cloudnet优于人工神经网络检索。第四,在高层云中,两种方法(Cloudnet和人工神经网络技术)都是有限的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating cloud liquid detection using cloud radar Doppler spectra in a pre-trained artificial neural network against Cloudnet liquid detection
Abstract. Detection of liquid-containing cloud layers in thick mixed-phase clouds or multi-layer cloud situations from ground-basedremote sensing instruments still pose observational challenges yet improvements are crucial since the existence of multi-layerliquid layers in mixed-phase cloud situations influences cloud radiative effects, cloud life time, and precipitation formationprocesses. Hydrometeor target classifications such as Cloudnet that require a lidar signal for the classification of liquid arelimited to the maximum height of lidar signal penetration and thus often lead to underestimations of liquid-containing cloudlayers. Here we evaluate the Cloudnet liquid detection against the approach of Luke et al. (2010) which extracts morphologicalfeatures in cloud-penetrating cloud radar Doppler spectra measurements in a artificial neural network (ANN) approach toclassify liquid beyond full lidar signal attenuation based on the simulation of the two lidar parameters particle backscattercoefficient and particle depolarization ratio. We show that the ANN of Luke et al. (2010) which was trained in Arctic conditionscan successfully be applied to observations in the mid-latitudes obtained during the seven-week long ACCEPT field experimentin Cabauw, the Netherlands, 2014. In a sensitivity study covering the whole duration of the ACCEPT campaign, different liquid-detectionthresholds for ANN-predicted lidar variables are applied and evaluated against the Cloudnet target classification.Independent validation of the liquid mask from the standard Cloudnet target classification against the ANN-based techniqueis realized by comparisons to observations of microwave radiometer liquid water path, ceilometer liquid-layer base altitude,and radiosonde relative humidity. Four conclusions were drawn from the investigation: First, it was found that the thresholdselection criteria of liquid-related lidar backscatter and depolarization alone control the liquid detection considerably. Second,nevertheless, all threshold values used in the ANN-framework were found to outperform the Cloudnet target classification fordeep or multi-layer cloud situations where the lidar signal is fully attenuated within low liquid layers and the cloud reflectivityin higher cloud layers was sufficiently high to be detectable by the cloud radar. Third, in convective situations for whichlidar data is available and for which the imprint of cloud microphysics on the radar Doppler spectrum is decreased, Cloudnetoutperforms the ANN retrieval. Fourth, in high-level clouds both approaches (Cloudnet and the ANN technique), are limited.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信