腹腔镜胆囊切除术中经腹壁和脐口取胆囊的比较研究

T. Sainia, Vinay Kumar Golandaj, V. Malviya
{"title":"腹腔镜胆囊切除术中经腹壁和脐口取胆囊的比较研究","authors":"T. Sainia, Vinay Kumar Golandaj, V. Malviya","doi":"10.17511/ijoso.2020.i03.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: This comparative prospective study was conducted at the L.N. Medical College and J.K. Hospital Bhopal Madhya Pradesh for a period of one year from Jan 2019 to Dec 2019. \nMaterial and Methods: The study included 100 patients who underwent planned four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic, asymptomatic cholelithiasis, and benign gall bladder diseases. These patients were randomly divided into two groups. The first 50 patients in whom GB was retrieved from Epigastric port were assigned in Group A and the other 50 patients where GB was retrieved from Umbilical port were assigned in Group B. The fascial defect of a 10 mm port was closed by vicryl \"2.0\" with a port closure needle, while three 5 mm ports closed by applying sterile small dressing. Both groups use a surgical glove endobag for gall bladder retrieval. \nResults: The results of both these techniques were collected and analyzed. The mean age of patients was 43.8 years in group A and 43.6 in group B. The male to female ratio was near 1:2. in both groups. Group A VAS score is 4.2 and while in group B 3.1. \nConclusion: Post-operative port site infection in group A was 2% while in group B is 4%, post-operative port site scar was cosmetically better and satisfactory in umbilical port than epigastric port.","PeriodicalId":267909,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Update: International Journal of Surgery and Orthopedics","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gallbladder retrieval through an epigastric and umbilical port in laparoscopic cholecystectomy- a comparative study\",\"authors\":\"T. Sainia, Vinay Kumar Golandaj, V. Malviya\",\"doi\":\"10.17511/ijoso.2020.i03.02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: This comparative prospective study was conducted at the L.N. Medical College and J.K. Hospital Bhopal Madhya Pradesh for a period of one year from Jan 2019 to Dec 2019. \\nMaterial and Methods: The study included 100 patients who underwent planned four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic, asymptomatic cholelithiasis, and benign gall bladder diseases. These patients were randomly divided into two groups. The first 50 patients in whom GB was retrieved from Epigastric port were assigned in Group A and the other 50 patients where GB was retrieved from Umbilical port were assigned in Group B. The fascial defect of a 10 mm port was closed by vicryl \\\"2.0\\\" with a port closure needle, while three 5 mm ports closed by applying sterile small dressing. Both groups use a surgical glove endobag for gall bladder retrieval. \\nResults: The results of both these techniques were collected and analyzed. The mean age of patients was 43.8 years in group A and 43.6 in group B. The male to female ratio was near 1:2. in both groups. Group A VAS score is 4.2 and while in group B 3.1. \\nConclusion: Post-operative port site infection in group A was 2% while in group B is 4%, post-operative port site scar was cosmetically better and satisfactory in umbilical port than epigastric port.\",\"PeriodicalId\":267909,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical Update: International Journal of Surgery and Orthopedics\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical Update: International Journal of Surgery and Orthopedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17511/ijoso.2020.i03.02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Update: International Journal of Surgery and Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17511/ijoso.2020.i03.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:本比较前瞻性研究于2019年1月至2019年12月在中央邦博帕尔的L.N.医学院和J.K.医院进行,为期一年。材料和方法:本研究纳入了100例因有症状、无症状胆结石和良性胆囊疾病行计划四孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者。这些患者被随机分为两组。将前50例从上腹口取出GB的患者分为A组,其余50例从脐口取出GB的患者分为b组。其中10 mm口的筋膜缺损用端口闭合针用vicryl“2.0”闭合,5 mm口的3例用无菌小敷料闭合。两组均使用手术手套内袋进行胆囊取出。结果:收集并分析了两种方法的检测结果。A组患者平均年龄43.8岁,b组患者平均年龄43.6岁,男女比例接近1:2。在两组中。A组VAS评分4.2分,B组评分3.1分。结论:A组术后port部位感染发生率为2%,B组为4%,脐口术后port部位瘢痕美容效果好于上胃口。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gallbladder retrieval through an epigastric and umbilical port in laparoscopic cholecystectomy- a comparative study
Aim: This comparative prospective study was conducted at the L.N. Medical College and J.K. Hospital Bhopal Madhya Pradesh for a period of one year from Jan 2019 to Dec 2019. Material and Methods: The study included 100 patients who underwent planned four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic, asymptomatic cholelithiasis, and benign gall bladder diseases. These patients were randomly divided into two groups. The first 50 patients in whom GB was retrieved from Epigastric port were assigned in Group A and the other 50 patients where GB was retrieved from Umbilical port were assigned in Group B. The fascial defect of a 10 mm port was closed by vicryl "2.0" with a port closure needle, while three 5 mm ports closed by applying sterile small dressing. Both groups use a surgical glove endobag for gall bladder retrieval. Results: The results of both these techniques were collected and analyzed. The mean age of patients was 43.8 years in group A and 43.6 in group B. The male to female ratio was near 1:2. in both groups. Group A VAS score is 4.2 and while in group B 3.1. Conclusion: Post-operative port site infection in group A was 2% while in group B is 4%, post-operative port site scar was cosmetically better and satisfactory in umbilical port than epigastric port.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信