裂纹铸铁曲轴箱

F. Naumann, F. Spies
{"title":"裂纹铸铁曲轴箱","authors":"F. Naumann, F. Spies","doi":"10.31399/asm.fach.process.c9001197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The front wall of a cast iron crankcase cracked at the transition from the comparatively minor wall thickness to the thick bosses for the drilling of the bolt holes. Metallographic examination showed the case was aggravated by the fact that the casting had a ferritic basic structure and the graphite in part showed a granular formation, so that strength of the material was low. In a second crankcase with the same crack formation the structure in the thick-wailed part was better. But it also showed granular graphite in the ferritic matrix in the thin-walled part between the dendrites of the primary solid solution precipitated in the residual melt. A third crankcase had fractures in two places, first at the frontal end wall and second at the thinnest point between two bore holes. In all three cases casting stresses caused by unfavorable construction and rapid cooling were responsible for the crack formation. A fourth crankcase had cracked in the bore-hole of the frontal face. In this case the cause of the fracture was the low strength of a region that was caused by a bad microstructure further weakened by the bore hole.","PeriodicalId":294593,"journal":{"name":"ASM Failure Analysis Case Histories: Processing Errors and Defects","volume":"141 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cracked Cast Iron Crankcases\",\"authors\":\"F. Naumann, F. Spies\",\"doi\":\"10.31399/asm.fach.process.c9001197\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The front wall of a cast iron crankcase cracked at the transition from the comparatively minor wall thickness to the thick bosses for the drilling of the bolt holes. Metallographic examination showed the case was aggravated by the fact that the casting had a ferritic basic structure and the graphite in part showed a granular formation, so that strength of the material was low. In a second crankcase with the same crack formation the structure in the thick-wailed part was better. But it also showed granular graphite in the ferritic matrix in the thin-walled part between the dendrites of the primary solid solution precipitated in the residual melt. A third crankcase had fractures in two places, first at the frontal end wall and second at the thinnest point between two bore holes. In all three cases casting stresses caused by unfavorable construction and rapid cooling were responsible for the crack formation. A fourth crankcase had cracked in the bore-hole of the frontal face. In this case the cause of the fracture was the low strength of a region that was caused by a bad microstructure further weakened by the bore hole.\",\"PeriodicalId\":294593,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ASM Failure Analysis Case Histories: Processing Errors and Defects\",\"volume\":\"141 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ASM Failure Analysis Case Histories: Processing Errors and Defects\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31399/asm.fach.process.c9001197\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASM Failure Analysis Case Histories: Processing Errors and Defects","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31399/asm.fach.process.c9001197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

铸铁曲轴箱的前壁在钻螺栓孔时由较薄的壁厚过渡到较厚的凸台时开裂。金相检验表明,铸件呈铁素体基本组织,部分石墨呈颗粒状,材料强度较低,加重了铸件的硬度。在相同裂纹形成的第二个曲轴箱中,厚壁件的结构更好。但在残余熔体中析出的初生固溶体的枝晶之间的薄壁部分,铁素体基体中也有粒状石墨。第三个曲轴箱在两个地方有裂缝,第一个在前端壁上,第二个在两个钻孔之间的最薄处。在所有三种情况下,不利的结构和快速冷却引起的铸造应力是裂纹形成的原因。第四个曲轴箱在正面的钻孔处裂开了。在这种情况下,导致断裂的原因是一个区域的低强度,这是由钻孔进一步削弱的不良微观组织造成的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cracked Cast Iron Crankcases
The front wall of a cast iron crankcase cracked at the transition from the comparatively minor wall thickness to the thick bosses for the drilling of the bolt holes. Metallographic examination showed the case was aggravated by the fact that the casting had a ferritic basic structure and the graphite in part showed a granular formation, so that strength of the material was low. In a second crankcase with the same crack formation the structure in the thick-wailed part was better. But it also showed granular graphite in the ferritic matrix in the thin-walled part between the dendrites of the primary solid solution precipitated in the residual melt. A third crankcase had fractures in two places, first at the frontal end wall and second at the thinnest point between two bore holes. In all three cases casting stresses caused by unfavorable construction and rapid cooling were responsible for the crack formation. A fourth crankcase had cracked in the bore-hole of the frontal face. In this case the cause of the fracture was the low strength of a region that was caused by a bad microstructure further weakened by the bore hole.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信