解码转发中继协议胜过传输分集吗?

T. Renk, H. Jaekel, F. Jondral, A. Goldsmith
{"title":"解码转发中继协议胜过传输分集吗?","authors":"T. Renk, H. Jaekel, F. Jondral, A. Goldsmith","doi":"10.1109/EW.2010.5483434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper addresses the question whether decode-and-forward relaying protocols can beat transmit diversity with respect to ε-outage capacity. We derive expressions of ε-outage capacity for transmit diversity, decode-and-forward, selective decode-and-forward, and incremental decode-and-forward. We demonstrate that the relaying protocols outperform transmit diversity in certain regions. Decode-and-forward is beneficial over transmit diversity when the relay is located close to the source. For selective decode-and-forward to beat transmit diversity, the relay should be placed between the source and the destination, but not too close to the source. The best performance is achieved by incremental decode-and-forward. The region in which this scheme is beneficial over transmit diversity is large. Moreover, as the region becomes smaller, the outage probability for the source-destination link becomes larger.","PeriodicalId":232165,"journal":{"name":"2010 European Wireless Conference (EW)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do decode-and-forward relaying protocols beat transmit diversity?\",\"authors\":\"T. Renk, H. Jaekel, F. Jondral, A. Goldsmith\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EW.2010.5483434\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper addresses the question whether decode-and-forward relaying protocols can beat transmit diversity with respect to ε-outage capacity. We derive expressions of ε-outage capacity for transmit diversity, decode-and-forward, selective decode-and-forward, and incremental decode-and-forward. We demonstrate that the relaying protocols outperform transmit diversity in certain regions. Decode-and-forward is beneficial over transmit diversity when the relay is located close to the source. For selective decode-and-forward to beat transmit diversity, the relay should be placed between the source and the destination, but not too close to the source. The best performance is achieved by incremental decode-and-forward. The region in which this scheme is beneficial over transmit diversity is large. Moreover, as the region becomes smaller, the outage probability for the source-destination link becomes larger.\",\"PeriodicalId\":232165,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2010 European Wireless Conference (EW)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-04-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2010 European Wireless Conference (EW)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EW.2010.5483434\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 European Wireless Conference (EW)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EW.2010.5483434","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本文讨论了解码转发中继协议在ε-中断容量方面是否优于传输分集的问题。推导了发射分集、译码转发、选择性译码转发和增量译码转发的ε-中断容量表达式。我们证明了中继协议在某些区域优于传输分集。当中继靠近信号源时,译码转发比发射分集更有利。对于选择性的译码转发来击败发射分集,中继应该放置在源和目标之间,但不要太靠近源。采用增量式译码转发可以达到最佳性能。该方案对传输分集有利的区域较大。而且,区域越小,源-目的链路的中断概率越大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do decode-and-forward relaying protocols beat transmit diversity?
This paper addresses the question whether decode-and-forward relaying protocols can beat transmit diversity with respect to ε-outage capacity. We derive expressions of ε-outage capacity for transmit diversity, decode-and-forward, selective decode-and-forward, and incremental decode-and-forward. We demonstrate that the relaying protocols outperform transmit diversity in certain regions. Decode-and-forward is beneficial over transmit diversity when the relay is located close to the source. For selective decode-and-forward to beat transmit diversity, the relay should be placed between the source and the destination, but not too close to the source. The best performance is achieved by incremental decode-and-forward. The region in which this scheme is beneficial over transmit diversity is large. Moreover, as the region becomes smaller, the outage probability for the source-destination link becomes larger.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信