特别参考氯的海洋浮游植物生物测定程序

Chesapeake Science Pub Date : 1977-03-01 DOI:10.2307/1350384
M. Roberts
{"title":"特别参考氯的海洋浮游植物生物测定程序","authors":"M. Roberts","doi":"10.2307/1350384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In general, bioassay procedures for phytoplankton have involved measurement of population enumerative parameters (such as specific growth rate, biomass, or chlorophyll a concentration) or population functional parameters (such as 14C uptake) in static cultures exposed to a toxicant. From these data, an estimate is then made of the concentration of the toxicant having some defined effect. Hirayama and Hirano (1970) used the experimental design shown in Fig. 1 to assess the effects of a 5 or 10 min. exposure to chlorine on phytoplankton by measuring subsequent population growth rates. Skeletonema was found to be more sensitive than Chlamydomonas, with the major effect being an increase in the time elapsed before measurable growth occurred. In these experiments, high population densities and nutrient enrichment were employed raising the possibility that the populations were capable of tolerating higher chlorine doses than might natural populations. Roberts and Diaz (1976) measured primary productivity potential of populations of four phytoplankton species (Tetraselmis suecica, Pseudoisochrysis paradoxa, Pyramimonas virginica, and Nannochloris occulatus) exposed to logarithmic chlorine dose series at three temperatures and three salinities (Fig. 2). The cultures were established in filtered pasteurized nonenriched water at cell densities comparable to wild phytoplankton populations (103 cells/ml). The relationship between carbon uptake (expressed as percent of control) and log chlorine dose was often non-linear, whereas the relationship between assimilation ratio (expressed as percent of control) and log chlorine dose was linear (Fig. 3). (Assimilation ratio as used here means the carbon uptake rate/chlorophyll a concentration.) Fig. 4 shows typical results for combined temperature/chlorine effects. Deviation from the original culture temperature tended to increase the sensitivity to chlorine. An unex-","PeriodicalId":106819,"journal":{"name":"Chesapeake Science","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1977-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bioassay procedures for marine phytoplankton with special reference to chlorine\",\"authors\":\"M. Roberts\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/1350384\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In general, bioassay procedures for phytoplankton have involved measurement of population enumerative parameters (such as specific growth rate, biomass, or chlorophyll a concentration) or population functional parameters (such as 14C uptake) in static cultures exposed to a toxicant. From these data, an estimate is then made of the concentration of the toxicant having some defined effect. Hirayama and Hirano (1970) used the experimental design shown in Fig. 1 to assess the effects of a 5 or 10 min. exposure to chlorine on phytoplankton by measuring subsequent population growth rates. Skeletonema was found to be more sensitive than Chlamydomonas, with the major effect being an increase in the time elapsed before measurable growth occurred. In these experiments, high population densities and nutrient enrichment were employed raising the possibility that the populations were capable of tolerating higher chlorine doses than might natural populations. Roberts and Diaz (1976) measured primary productivity potential of populations of four phytoplankton species (Tetraselmis suecica, Pseudoisochrysis paradoxa, Pyramimonas virginica, and Nannochloris occulatus) exposed to logarithmic chlorine dose series at three temperatures and three salinities (Fig. 2). The cultures were established in filtered pasteurized nonenriched water at cell densities comparable to wild phytoplankton populations (103 cells/ml). The relationship between carbon uptake (expressed as percent of control) and log chlorine dose was often non-linear, whereas the relationship between assimilation ratio (expressed as percent of control) and log chlorine dose was linear (Fig. 3). (Assimilation ratio as used here means the carbon uptake rate/chlorophyll a concentration.) Fig. 4 shows typical results for combined temperature/chlorine effects. Deviation from the original culture temperature tended to increase the sensitivity to chlorine. An unex-\",\"PeriodicalId\":106819,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chesapeake Science\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1977-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chesapeake Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/1350384\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chesapeake Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1350384","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

一般来说,浮游植物的生物测定程序涉及在暴露于有毒物质的静态培养物中测量种群枚举参数(如特定生长率、生物量或叶绿素a浓度)或种群功能参数(如14C摄取)。根据这些数据,然后对具有某种确定影响的毒物的浓度作出估计。Hirayama和Hirano(1970)使用图1所示的实验设计,通过测量随后的种群增长率来评估暴露于氯5或10分钟对浮游植物的影响。发现骨骼肌比衣藻更敏感,主要影响是在可测量的生长发生之前的时间增加。在这些实验中,采用了高种群密度和营养富集的方法,提高了种群比自然种群能够耐受更高氯剂量的可能性。Roberts和Diaz(1976)测量了在三种温度和三种盐度下暴露于对数氯剂量序列的四种浮游植物种群(水四螺、似假等chrysis paradoxa、金角单胞菌和眼小绿藻)的初级生产力潜力(图2)。培养物建立在过滤巴氏消毒的非富集水中,细胞密度与野生浮游植物种群相当(103个细胞/ml)。碳吸收量(以对照的百分比表示)和对数氯剂量之间的关系通常是非线性的,而同化比(以对照的百分比表示)和对数氯剂量之间的关系是线性的(图3)。(这里使用的同化比是指碳吸收量/叶绿素a浓度)。图4显示了温度/氯复合效应的典型结果。偏离原始培养温度会增加对氯的敏感性。一个unex -
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bioassay procedures for marine phytoplankton with special reference to chlorine
In general, bioassay procedures for phytoplankton have involved measurement of population enumerative parameters (such as specific growth rate, biomass, or chlorophyll a concentration) or population functional parameters (such as 14C uptake) in static cultures exposed to a toxicant. From these data, an estimate is then made of the concentration of the toxicant having some defined effect. Hirayama and Hirano (1970) used the experimental design shown in Fig. 1 to assess the effects of a 5 or 10 min. exposure to chlorine on phytoplankton by measuring subsequent population growth rates. Skeletonema was found to be more sensitive than Chlamydomonas, with the major effect being an increase in the time elapsed before measurable growth occurred. In these experiments, high population densities and nutrient enrichment were employed raising the possibility that the populations were capable of tolerating higher chlorine doses than might natural populations. Roberts and Diaz (1976) measured primary productivity potential of populations of four phytoplankton species (Tetraselmis suecica, Pseudoisochrysis paradoxa, Pyramimonas virginica, and Nannochloris occulatus) exposed to logarithmic chlorine dose series at three temperatures and three salinities (Fig. 2). The cultures were established in filtered pasteurized nonenriched water at cell densities comparable to wild phytoplankton populations (103 cells/ml). The relationship between carbon uptake (expressed as percent of control) and log chlorine dose was often non-linear, whereas the relationship between assimilation ratio (expressed as percent of control) and log chlorine dose was linear (Fig. 3). (Assimilation ratio as used here means the carbon uptake rate/chlorophyll a concentration.) Fig. 4 shows typical results for combined temperature/chlorine effects. Deviation from the original culture temperature tended to increase the sensitivity to chlorine. An unex-
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信