正压模式中的低频状态转换和状态的可预测性

B. Nadiga, T. O’Kane
{"title":"正压模式中的低频状态转换和状态的可预测性","authors":"B. Nadiga, T. O’Kane","doi":"10.1017/9781316339251.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Predictability of flow is examined in a barotropic vorticity model that admits low frequency regime transitions between zonal and dipolar states. Such transitions in the model were first studied by Bouchet and Simonnet (2009) and are reminiscent of regime change phenomena in the weather and climate systems wherein extreme and abrupt qualitative changes occur, seemingly randomly, after long periods of apparent stability. Mechanisms underlying regime transitions in the model are not well understood yet. From the point of view of atmospheric and oceanic dynamics, a novel aspect of the model is the lack of any source of background gradient of potential-vorticity such as topography or planetary gradient of rotation rate (e.g., as in Charney & DeVore '79). \nWe consider perturbations that are embedded onto the system's chaotic attractor under the full nonlinear dynamics as bred vectors---nonlinear generalizations of the leading (backward) Lyapunov vector. We find that ensemble predictions that use bred vector perturbations are more robust in terms of error-spread relationship than those that use Lyapunov vector perturbations. In particular, when bred vector perturbations are used in conjunction with a simple data assimilation scheme (nudging to truth), we find that at least some of the evolved perturbations align to identify low-dimensional subspaces associated with regions of large forecast error in the control (unperturbed, data-assimilating) run; this happens less often in ensemble predictions that use Lyapunov vector perturbations. Nevertheless, in the inertial regime we consider, we find that (a) the system is more predictable when it is in the zonal regime, and that (b) the horizon of predictability is far too short compared to characteristic time scales associated with processes that lead to regime transitions, thus precluding the possibility of predicting such transitions.","PeriodicalId":166772,"journal":{"name":"arXiv: Chaotic Dynamics","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Low-frequency regime transitions and predictability of regimes in a barotropic model\",\"authors\":\"B. Nadiga, T. O’Kane\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/9781316339251.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Predictability of flow is examined in a barotropic vorticity model that admits low frequency regime transitions between zonal and dipolar states. Such transitions in the model were first studied by Bouchet and Simonnet (2009) and are reminiscent of regime change phenomena in the weather and climate systems wherein extreme and abrupt qualitative changes occur, seemingly randomly, after long periods of apparent stability. Mechanisms underlying regime transitions in the model are not well understood yet. From the point of view of atmospheric and oceanic dynamics, a novel aspect of the model is the lack of any source of background gradient of potential-vorticity such as topography or planetary gradient of rotation rate (e.g., as in Charney & DeVore '79). \\nWe consider perturbations that are embedded onto the system's chaotic attractor under the full nonlinear dynamics as bred vectors---nonlinear generalizations of the leading (backward) Lyapunov vector. We find that ensemble predictions that use bred vector perturbations are more robust in terms of error-spread relationship than those that use Lyapunov vector perturbations. In particular, when bred vector perturbations are used in conjunction with a simple data assimilation scheme (nudging to truth), we find that at least some of the evolved perturbations align to identify low-dimensional subspaces associated with regions of large forecast error in the control (unperturbed, data-assimilating) run; this happens less often in ensemble predictions that use Lyapunov vector perturbations. Nevertheless, in the inertial regime we consider, we find that (a) the system is more predictable when it is in the zonal regime, and that (b) the horizon of predictability is far too short compared to characteristic time scales associated with processes that lead to regime transitions, thus precluding the possibility of predicting such transitions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":166772,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv: Chaotic Dynamics\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv: Chaotic Dynamics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316339251.006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv: Chaotic Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316339251.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

在一个允许纬向和偶极态之间低频状态转换的正压涡量模式中检验了流动的可预测性。Bouchet和Simonnet(2009)首先对模型中的这种转变进行了研究,这让人联想到天气和气候系统中的政权变化现象,在长时间的表面稳定之后,极端和突然的质变似乎是随机发生的。模型中潜在的制度转换机制还没有得到很好的理解。从大气和海洋动力学的角度来看,该模型的一个新方面是缺乏任何潜在涡度背景梯度的来源,如地形或行星旋转速率梯度(例如,如Charney & DeVore '79)。我们考虑在完全非线性动力学下嵌入到系统混沌吸引子上的扰动作为繁殖向量——前导(后向)Lyapunov向量的非线性推广。我们发现,使用繁殖矢量扰动的集合预测在误差-传播关系方面比使用李雅普诺夫矢量扰动的集合预测更具鲁棒性。特别是,当生成的矢量扰动与简单的数据同化方案(逼近真相)结合使用时,我们发现至少有一些进化的扰动对齐以识别与控制(未扰动,数据同化)运行中大预测误差区域相关的低维子空间;这种情况在使用李雅普诺夫矢量摄动的集合预测中较少发生。然而,在我们考虑的惯性状态下,我们发现(a)系统处于纬向状态时更具可预测性,(b)与导致状态转变的过程相关的特征时间尺度相比,可预测性的范围太短,因此排除了预测这种转变的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Low-frequency regime transitions and predictability of regimes in a barotropic model
Predictability of flow is examined in a barotropic vorticity model that admits low frequency regime transitions between zonal and dipolar states. Such transitions in the model were first studied by Bouchet and Simonnet (2009) and are reminiscent of regime change phenomena in the weather and climate systems wherein extreme and abrupt qualitative changes occur, seemingly randomly, after long periods of apparent stability. Mechanisms underlying regime transitions in the model are not well understood yet. From the point of view of atmospheric and oceanic dynamics, a novel aspect of the model is the lack of any source of background gradient of potential-vorticity such as topography or planetary gradient of rotation rate (e.g., as in Charney & DeVore '79). We consider perturbations that are embedded onto the system's chaotic attractor under the full nonlinear dynamics as bred vectors---nonlinear generalizations of the leading (backward) Lyapunov vector. We find that ensemble predictions that use bred vector perturbations are more robust in terms of error-spread relationship than those that use Lyapunov vector perturbations. In particular, when bred vector perturbations are used in conjunction with a simple data assimilation scheme (nudging to truth), we find that at least some of the evolved perturbations align to identify low-dimensional subspaces associated with regions of large forecast error in the control (unperturbed, data-assimilating) run; this happens less often in ensemble predictions that use Lyapunov vector perturbations. Nevertheless, in the inertial regime we consider, we find that (a) the system is more predictable when it is in the zonal regime, and that (b) the horizon of predictability is far too short compared to characteristic time scales associated with processes that lead to regime transitions, thus precluding the possibility of predicting such transitions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信