激光辅助冲洗在内镜消毒和清除硬组织碎片中的有效性:系统综述

H. Maftah, S. Dhaimy
{"title":"激光辅助冲洗在内镜消毒和清除硬组织碎片中的有效性:系统综述","authors":"H. Maftah, S. Dhaimy","doi":"10.33425/2639-9490.1110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The control of the bacterial load during an endodontic treatment is challenging; the usual chemomechanical procedures such as conventional needle irrigation (CNI) has not always shown satisfying outcomes. Hence, the necessity of finding complementary methods such as passive ultra-sonic irrigation (PUI), sonic activated irrigation (SAI) and laser assisted irrigation (LAI) in order to achieve the most complete disinfection of the endodontic system. The aim of our study is to systematically review and critically analyze the current evidence of the effectiveness of laser assisted irrigation when compared to CNI, PUI, SAI. Materials and methods: Electronic search on four data-bases: PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect and Cochrane Library was done looking for Systematic reviews, in-vitro and clinical controlled trials assessing the effectiveness of LAI in removing bacteria and dentine debris. Articles were selected, deduplicated than assessed. The studies that met all the inclusion criteria were included and were further screened in order to extract their data and evaluate their methodological quality. Results: The electronic search yielded a total of 895 potentially eligible record. After the final stage of selection, 25 studies, that are all in-vitro were included; the risk of bias and quality assessment was done through the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis and the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal Checklist. All in all, LAI showed better results when compared to CNI in both removal of bacteria and smear layer, yet when compared to PUI and SAI, the studies could not testify significantly for the superiority of an activation method over another. Conclusion: The use of LAI increased the potential of the irrigant within the endodontic system, especially when compared to CNI. Yet the current data could not give a conclusive judgment of the effectiveness of LAI when compared to PUI and to SAI; eventually further studies need to be performed.","PeriodicalId":263229,"journal":{"name":"Oral Health and Dental science","volume":"170 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effectiveness of Laser Assisted Irrigation in Endocanalary Disinfection and Hard Tissue Debris Removal: A Systematic Review\",\"authors\":\"H. Maftah, S. Dhaimy\",\"doi\":\"10.33425/2639-9490.1110\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: The control of the bacterial load during an endodontic treatment is challenging; the usual chemomechanical procedures such as conventional needle irrigation (CNI) has not always shown satisfying outcomes. Hence, the necessity of finding complementary methods such as passive ultra-sonic irrigation (PUI), sonic activated irrigation (SAI) and laser assisted irrigation (LAI) in order to achieve the most complete disinfection of the endodontic system. The aim of our study is to systematically review and critically analyze the current evidence of the effectiveness of laser assisted irrigation when compared to CNI, PUI, SAI. Materials and methods: Electronic search on four data-bases: PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect and Cochrane Library was done looking for Systematic reviews, in-vitro and clinical controlled trials assessing the effectiveness of LAI in removing bacteria and dentine debris. Articles were selected, deduplicated than assessed. The studies that met all the inclusion criteria were included and were further screened in order to extract their data and evaluate their methodological quality. Results: The electronic search yielded a total of 895 potentially eligible record. After the final stage of selection, 25 studies, that are all in-vitro were included; the risk of bias and quality assessment was done through the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis and the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal Checklist. All in all, LAI showed better results when compared to CNI in both removal of bacteria and smear layer, yet when compared to PUI and SAI, the studies could not testify significantly for the superiority of an activation method over another. Conclusion: The use of LAI increased the potential of the irrigant within the endodontic system, especially when compared to CNI. Yet the current data could not give a conclusive judgment of the effectiveness of LAI when compared to PUI and to SAI; eventually further studies need to be performed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":263229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oral Health and Dental science\",\"volume\":\"170 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oral Health and Dental science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33425/2639-9490.1110\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral Health and Dental science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33425/2639-9490.1110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在根管治疗期间控制细菌负荷是具有挑战性的;通常的化学力学方法,如传统的针灌(CNI)并不总是显示出令人满意的结果。因此,有必要寻找互补的方法,如被动超声冲洗(PUI)、超声激活冲洗(SAI)和激光辅助冲洗(LAI),以达到对根管系统最彻底的消毒。我们研究的目的是系统地回顾和批判性地分析激光辅助灌洗与CNI, PUI, SAI相比有效性的现有证据。材料和方法:电子检索PubMed、Scopus、ScienceDirect和Cochrane Library四个数据库,寻找评估LAI去除细菌和牙本质碎片有效性的系统综述、体外和临床对照试验。文章经过筛选,重复删除,然后评估。纳入符合所有纳入标准的研究,并对其进行进一步筛选,以提取其数据并评估其方法学质量。结果:电子检索共获得895条潜在符合条件的记录。在选择的最后阶段,25项研究都是体外的;偏倚风险和质量评估是通过系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目和乔安娜布里格斯研究所关键评估清单进行的。总而言之,LAI在去除细菌和涂片层方面均优于CNI,但与PUI和SAI相比,研究并不能明显证明一种活化方法优于另一种活化方法。结论:与CNI相比,LAI的使用增加了根管系统内灌洗剂的潜力。然而,目前的数据还不能对LAI与PUI和SAI相比的有效性给出决定性的判断;最终需要进行进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Effectiveness of Laser Assisted Irrigation in Endocanalary Disinfection and Hard Tissue Debris Removal: A Systematic Review
Introduction: The control of the bacterial load during an endodontic treatment is challenging; the usual chemomechanical procedures such as conventional needle irrigation (CNI) has not always shown satisfying outcomes. Hence, the necessity of finding complementary methods such as passive ultra-sonic irrigation (PUI), sonic activated irrigation (SAI) and laser assisted irrigation (LAI) in order to achieve the most complete disinfection of the endodontic system. The aim of our study is to systematically review and critically analyze the current evidence of the effectiveness of laser assisted irrigation when compared to CNI, PUI, SAI. Materials and methods: Electronic search on four data-bases: PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect and Cochrane Library was done looking for Systematic reviews, in-vitro and clinical controlled trials assessing the effectiveness of LAI in removing bacteria and dentine debris. Articles were selected, deduplicated than assessed. The studies that met all the inclusion criteria were included and were further screened in order to extract their data and evaluate their methodological quality. Results: The electronic search yielded a total of 895 potentially eligible record. After the final stage of selection, 25 studies, that are all in-vitro were included; the risk of bias and quality assessment was done through the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis and the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal Checklist. All in all, LAI showed better results when compared to CNI in both removal of bacteria and smear layer, yet when compared to PUI and SAI, the studies could not testify significantly for the superiority of an activation method over another. Conclusion: The use of LAI increased the potential of the irrigant within the endodontic system, especially when compared to CNI. Yet the current data could not give a conclusive judgment of the effectiveness of LAI when compared to PUI and to SAI; eventually further studies need to be performed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信