现代人中的大师:黑格尔、罗森博格、布洛赫和凯奇

Eckhart Review Pub Date : 2009-03-27 DOI:10.1558/mmt.v18.4
S. Bullivant
{"title":"现代人中的大师:黑格尔、罗森博格、布洛赫和凯奇","authors":"S. Bullivant","doi":"10.1558/mmt.v18.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"My aim in this paper is to demonstrate, albeit briefly, just how diverse Eckhart’s influences have been over the past two hundred years. To do this I have selected four men – G.W.F. Hegel, Alfred Rosenberg, Ernst Bloch and John Cage. They are not only very different from each other, but are in some cases almost polar opposites. While I give a short explanation as to who they were and where Eckhart comes in, for the most part, I will let their writings speak for themselves. As a result, the transitions in the paper may seem a little abrupt, but in many ways that captures the point I wish to make. I am going to juxtapose these four figures, each very significant in his own right, so as to convey what a varied – and, in some cases, rather treacherous – terrain exists when considering the idea of ‘Meister Eckhart and Modern Thought’.","PeriodicalId":277704,"journal":{"name":"Eckhart Review","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Meister among the Moderns: Hegel, Rosenberg, Bloch and Cage\",\"authors\":\"S. Bullivant\",\"doi\":\"10.1558/mmt.v18.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"My aim in this paper is to demonstrate, albeit briefly, just how diverse Eckhart’s influences have been over the past two hundred years. To do this I have selected four men – G.W.F. Hegel, Alfred Rosenberg, Ernst Bloch and John Cage. They are not only very different from each other, but are in some cases almost polar opposites. While I give a short explanation as to who they were and where Eckhart comes in, for the most part, I will let their writings speak for themselves. As a result, the transitions in the paper may seem a little abrupt, but in many ways that captures the point I wish to make. I am going to juxtapose these four figures, each very significant in his own right, so as to convey what a varied – and, in some cases, rather treacherous – terrain exists when considering the idea of ‘Meister Eckhart and Modern Thought’.\",\"PeriodicalId\":277704,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eckhart Review\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eckhart Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1558/mmt.v18.4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eckhart Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1558/mmt.v18.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这篇文章中,我的目的是简要地说明,在过去的200年里,埃克哈特的影响是多么的多样化。为此,我选择了四个人——G.W.F.黑格尔、阿尔弗雷德·罗森伯格、恩斯特·布洛赫和约翰·凯奇。它们不仅彼此非常不同,而且在某些情况下几乎是两极对立的。虽然我会简短地解释一下他们是谁,以及埃克哈特从何而来,但在大多数情况下,我会让他们的作品为自己说话。因此,文章中的过渡可能看起来有点突兀,但在很多方面都抓住了我想要表达的观点。我将把这四个人物并列在一起,每个人都在自己的权利上非常重要,以便传达在考虑“埃克哈特和现代思想”的想法时,存在着多么多样的——在某些情况下,相当危险的——地形。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Meister among the Moderns: Hegel, Rosenberg, Bloch and Cage
My aim in this paper is to demonstrate, albeit briefly, just how diverse Eckhart’s influences have been over the past two hundred years. To do this I have selected four men – G.W.F. Hegel, Alfred Rosenberg, Ernst Bloch and John Cage. They are not only very different from each other, but are in some cases almost polar opposites. While I give a short explanation as to who they were and where Eckhart comes in, for the most part, I will let their writings speak for themselves. As a result, the transitions in the paper may seem a little abrupt, but in many ways that captures the point I wish to make. I am going to juxtapose these four figures, each very significant in his own right, so as to convey what a varied – and, in some cases, rather treacherous – terrain exists when considering the idea of ‘Meister Eckhart and Modern Thought’.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信