固定开关频率的有限控制集模型预测控制与单腿逆变器电流控制的线性控制

M. Tomlinson, T. Mouton, R. Kennel
{"title":"固定开关频率的有限控制集模型预测控制与单腿逆变器电流控制的线性控制","authors":"M. Tomlinson, T. Mouton, R. Kennel","doi":"10.1109/PRECEDE.2015.7395592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper a finite-control-set model predictive control (FCS-MPC) scheme for achieving a fixed switching frequency is compared with a linear regulator for current control of a single-leg inverter driving a resistive-inductive load with a back-EMF. This comparison is motivated by the fact that finite-control-set MPC is often regarded as having an inferior output waveform quality compared to PWM due to a variable switching frequency. In this paper, an oversampled FCS-MPC control scheme that achieves a fixed switching frequency through hard constraints is compared to an oversampled and well-tuned linear resonant regulator. It will be shown that by oversampling the predictive controller and forcing a fixed switching frequency scheme, the output waveform quality of FCS-MPC can produce results similar to that of a PWM-based controller. It will further be shown that the typical one-sample delay during reference step changes and the effects of model uncertainties such a DC bus ripple are greatly reduced if the predictive controller is sampled at a much higher rate than the switching frequency.","PeriodicalId":271130,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE International Symposium on Predictive Control of Electrical Drives and Power Electronics (PRECEDE)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Finite-control-set model predictive control with a fixed switching frequency vs. linear control for current control of a single-leg inverter\",\"authors\":\"M. Tomlinson, T. Mouton, R. Kennel\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PRECEDE.2015.7395592\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper a finite-control-set model predictive control (FCS-MPC) scheme for achieving a fixed switching frequency is compared with a linear regulator for current control of a single-leg inverter driving a resistive-inductive load with a back-EMF. This comparison is motivated by the fact that finite-control-set MPC is often regarded as having an inferior output waveform quality compared to PWM due to a variable switching frequency. In this paper, an oversampled FCS-MPC control scheme that achieves a fixed switching frequency through hard constraints is compared to an oversampled and well-tuned linear resonant regulator. It will be shown that by oversampling the predictive controller and forcing a fixed switching frequency scheme, the output waveform quality of FCS-MPC can produce results similar to that of a PWM-based controller. It will further be shown that the typical one-sample delay during reference step changes and the effects of model uncertainties such a DC bus ripple are greatly reduced if the predictive controller is sampled at a much higher rate than the switching frequency.\",\"PeriodicalId\":271130,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 IEEE International Symposium on Predictive Control of Electrical Drives and Power Electronics (PRECEDE)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 IEEE International Symposium on Predictive Control of Electrical Drives and Power Electronics (PRECEDE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PRECEDE.2015.7395592\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE International Symposium on Predictive Control of Electrical Drives and Power Electronics (PRECEDE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PRECEDE.2015.7395592","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

本文将实现固定开关频率的有限控制集模型预测控制(FCS-MPC)方案与用于驱动具有反电动势的阻感性负载的单腿逆变器电流控制的线性调节器进行了比较。这种比较的动机是有限控制集MPC由于开关频率可变,通常被认为与PWM相比具有较差的输出波形质量。本文将一种通过硬约束实现固定开关频率的过采样FCS-MPC控制方案与过采样和良好调谐的线性谐振调节器进行了比较。将表明,通过对预测控制器进行过采样并强制采用固定的开关频率方案,FCS-MPC的输出波形质量可以产生与基于pwm的控制器相似的结果。进一步表明,如果预测控制器以比开关频率高得多的速率采样,则参考阶跃变化期间典型的单采样延迟和模型不确定性(如直流母线纹波)的影响将大大减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Finite-control-set model predictive control with a fixed switching frequency vs. linear control for current control of a single-leg inverter
In this paper a finite-control-set model predictive control (FCS-MPC) scheme for achieving a fixed switching frequency is compared with a linear regulator for current control of a single-leg inverter driving a resistive-inductive load with a back-EMF. This comparison is motivated by the fact that finite-control-set MPC is often regarded as having an inferior output waveform quality compared to PWM due to a variable switching frequency. In this paper, an oversampled FCS-MPC control scheme that achieves a fixed switching frequency through hard constraints is compared to an oversampled and well-tuned linear resonant regulator. It will be shown that by oversampling the predictive controller and forcing a fixed switching frequency scheme, the output waveform quality of FCS-MPC can produce results similar to that of a PWM-based controller. It will further be shown that the typical one-sample delay during reference step changes and the effects of model uncertainties such a DC bus ripple are greatly reduced if the predictive controller is sampled at a much higher rate than the switching frequency.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信