临床能力评估的迭代方法的力量

K. Gifford, J. Benson, Juli Kim
{"title":"临床能力评估的迭代方法的力量","authors":"K. Gifford, J. Benson, Juli Kim","doi":"10.20421/IGHPE2018.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many residency programs struggle with effective and efficient methods for their program to synthesize and analyze data to create robust milestones-based assessment of residents.  Residents and faculty in the Pediatric Residency at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center collaborated to design an innovative iterative process for resident assessment using rotation-based Milestones reports, faculty sub-committees, and discussion with the resident. Time spent and frequency of Milestones determinations made at each phase of assessment process were tabulated and feedback summarized from faculty, residents, and administrators.  Our new process integrated milestones determinations into our existing committee review structure without any additional time added to the process. Faculty perceived that the system was efficient and provided more insight about each resident.  The program director used the sub-committee summaries for semi-annual reviews and letters of reference. Residents appreciated the fairness of all residents being reviewed by the same faculty. Milestones determinations were made by: evaluations alone (69%), CCC sub-committee (18%), full CCC (7%), and additional data or PD decision (6%).   The full CCC was needed more frequently for professionalism and systems-based practice Milestones determinations.  Iterative assessment systems have the potential to save valuable faculty time without compromising the quality of assessments.  ","PeriodicalId":133169,"journal":{"name":"Innovations in Global Health Professions Education","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Power of an Iterative Approach to Clinical Competence Assessment\",\"authors\":\"K. Gifford, J. Benson, Juli Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.20421/IGHPE2018.02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many residency programs struggle with effective and efficient methods for their program to synthesize and analyze data to create robust milestones-based assessment of residents.  Residents and faculty in the Pediatric Residency at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center collaborated to design an innovative iterative process for resident assessment using rotation-based Milestones reports, faculty sub-committees, and discussion with the resident. Time spent and frequency of Milestones determinations made at each phase of assessment process were tabulated and feedback summarized from faculty, residents, and administrators.  Our new process integrated milestones determinations into our existing committee review structure without any additional time added to the process. Faculty perceived that the system was efficient and provided more insight about each resident.  The program director used the sub-committee summaries for semi-annual reviews and letters of reference. Residents appreciated the fairness of all residents being reviewed by the same faculty. Milestones determinations were made by: evaluations alone (69%), CCC sub-committee (18%), full CCC (7%), and additional data or PD decision (6%).   The full CCC was needed more frequently for professionalism and systems-based practice Milestones determinations.  Iterative assessment systems have the potential to save valuable faculty time without compromising the quality of assessments.  \",\"PeriodicalId\":133169,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Innovations in Global Health Professions Education\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Innovations in Global Health Professions Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20421/IGHPE2018.02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovations in Global Health Professions Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20421/IGHPE2018.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

许多住院医师项目都在努力寻找有效和高效的方法来综合和分析数据,以创建稳健的基于里程碑的住院医师评估。达特茅斯-希区柯克医疗中心的儿科住院医师和教师合作设计了一个创新的住院医师评估迭代过程,使用基于轮转的里程碑报告、教师小组委员会和与住院医师的讨论。在评估过程的每个阶段所花费的时间和确定里程碑的频率被制成表格,并总结了来自教师、住院医生和管理人员的反馈。我们的新流程将里程碑决定整合到我们现有的委员会审查结构中,而无需在流程中添加任何额外的时间。教师们认为这个系统是有效的,并提供了更多关于每个住院医生的见解。项目主管将小组委员会的总结用于半年度审查和推荐信。住院医生们很欣赏所有住院医生都接受同一院系审查的公平性。里程碑的确定是通过以下方式完成的:单独评估(69%)、CCC小组委员会(18%)、完整CCC(7%)以及附加数据或PD决定(6%)。对于专业性和基于系统的实践里程碑的确定,更频繁地需要完整的CCC。迭代评估系统有可能在不影响评估质量的情况下节省宝贵的教师时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Power of an Iterative Approach to Clinical Competence Assessment
Many residency programs struggle with effective and efficient methods for their program to synthesize and analyze data to create robust milestones-based assessment of residents.  Residents and faculty in the Pediatric Residency at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center collaborated to design an innovative iterative process for resident assessment using rotation-based Milestones reports, faculty sub-committees, and discussion with the resident. Time spent and frequency of Milestones determinations made at each phase of assessment process were tabulated and feedback summarized from faculty, residents, and administrators.  Our new process integrated milestones determinations into our existing committee review structure without any additional time added to the process. Faculty perceived that the system was efficient and provided more insight about each resident.  The program director used the sub-committee summaries for semi-annual reviews and letters of reference. Residents appreciated the fairness of all residents being reviewed by the same faculty. Milestones determinations were made by: evaluations alone (69%), CCC sub-committee (18%), full CCC (7%), and additional data or PD decision (6%).   The full CCC was needed more frequently for professionalism and systems-based practice Milestones determinations.  Iterative assessment systems have the potential to save valuable faculty time without compromising the quality of assessments.  
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信