评论

C. Engel
{"title":"评论","authors":"C. Engel","doi":"10.1086/663656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This very interesting paper by Gianmarco Ottaviano explores the dynamics of fi rm behavior over the business cycle in a model with fi rm entry and exit. The paper has a number of precise predictions, and raises challenges for modeling macroeconomies. My aim in these brief comments is simply to draw links to the literature. I will not give a comprehensive review—this is certainly not my area of expertise—but I do want to indicate different literatures to which this paper belongs. In the introductory comments, Ottaviano links the paper to models of creative destruction, to models of search, and to macroeconomic models with imperfect competition. There are other literatures that, I think, are even more closely related. One really fascinating aspect of the analysis in this paper is that it raises questions about what macroeconomists mean by aggregate total factor productivity (TFP). Even if we could measure TFP at the fi rm level, it is not clear what the right way is to aggregate fi rm TFP to get a measure of economywide TFP. Aggregate statistics suggest a close link between TFP fl uctuations and the business cycle, and of course there has been a long ongoing debate about the meaning of that link. That is, does measured TFP capture actual exogenous changes in productivity, or is there labor hoarding, and so forth, that leads to endogenous movement in TFP? In this paper, exogenous shocks to labor productivity drive the business cycle. However, the implications for economywide TFP are not so clear. In the model, an increase in the productivity level of all fi rms draws less productive fi rms into production. Average productivity, as measured by the simple average of productivity over all fi rms in the economy, is infl uenced not only by the increase in productivity of fi rms","PeriodicalId":353207,"journal":{"name":"NBER International Seminar on Macroeconomics","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comment\",\"authors\":\"C. Engel\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/663656\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This very interesting paper by Gianmarco Ottaviano explores the dynamics of fi rm behavior over the business cycle in a model with fi rm entry and exit. The paper has a number of precise predictions, and raises challenges for modeling macroeconomies. My aim in these brief comments is simply to draw links to the literature. I will not give a comprehensive review—this is certainly not my area of expertise—but I do want to indicate different literatures to which this paper belongs. In the introductory comments, Ottaviano links the paper to models of creative destruction, to models of search, and to macroeconomic models with imperfect competition. There are other literatures that, I think, are even more closely related. One really fascinating aspect of the analysis in this paper is that it raises questions about what macroeconomists mean by aggregate total factor productivity (TFP). Even if we could measure TFP at the fi rm level, it is not clear what the right way is to aggregate fi rm TFP to get a measure of economywide TFP. Aggregate statistics suggest a close link between TFP fl uctuations and the business cycle, and of course there has been a long ongoing debate about the meaning of that link. That is, does measured TFP capture actual exogenous changes in productivity, or is there labor hoarding, and so forth, that leads to endogenous movement in TFP? In this paper, exogenous shocks to labor productivity drive the business cycle. However, the implications for economywide TFP are not so clear. In the model, an increase in the productivity level of all fi rms draws less productive fi rms into production. Average productivity, as measured by the simple average of productivity over all fi rms in the economy, is infl uenced not only by the increase in productivity of fi rms\",\"PeriodicalId\":353207,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NBER International Seminar on Macroeconomics\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NBER International Seminar on Macroeconomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/663656\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NBER International Seminar on Macroeconomics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/663656","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Gianmarco Ottaviano的这篇非常有趣的论文在一个有企业进入和退出的模型中探讨了企业行为在商业周期中的动态。这篇论文有许多精确的预测,并对宏观经济建模提出了挑战。在这些简短的评论中,我的目的仅仅是与文献联系起来。我不会给出一个全面的评论——这当然不是我的专业领域——但我确实想指出这篇论文属于不同的文献。在引言中,Ottaviano将论文与创造性破坏模型、搜索模型和不完全竞争的宏观经济模型联系起来。我认为还有其他的文献,关系更密切。本文中分析的一个真正吸引人的方面是,它提出了一个问题,即宏观经济学家所说的总全要素生产率(TFP)是什么意思。即使我们可以在企业层面上衡量TFP,也不清楚什么是正确的方法来汇总企业TFP来衡量整个经济的TFP。总体统计数据表明,全要素生产率波动与商业周期之间存在密切联系,当然,关于这种联系的含义一直存在长期争论。也就是说,衡量的TFP是否捕捉到了生产率的实际外生变化,或者是否存在劳动力囤积,等等,导致了TFP的内生运动?在本文中,对劳动生产率的外生冲击驱动经济周期。然而,对整个经济的全要素生产率的影响并不那么清楚。在该模型中,所有企业生产率水平的提高会吸引生产率较低的企业投入生产。平均生产率,用经济中所有企业生产率的简单平均值来衡量,不仅受到企业生产率提高的影响
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comment
This very interesting paper by Gianmarco Ottaviano explores the dynamics of fi rm behavior over the business cycle in a model with fi rm entry and exit. The paper has a number of precise predictions, and raises challenges for modeling macroeconomies. My aim in these brief comments is simply to draw links to the literature. I will not give a comprehensive review—this is certainly not my area of expertise—but I do want to indicate different literatures to which this paper belongs. In the introductory comments, Ottaviano links the paper to models of creative destruction, to models of search, and to macroeconomic models with imperfect competition. There are other literatures that, I think, are even more closely related. One really fascinating aspect of the analysis in this paper is that it raises questions about what macroeconomists mean by aggregate total factor productivity (TFP). Even if we could measure TFP at the fi rm level, it is not clear what the right way is to aggregate fi rm TFP to get a measure of economywide TFP. Aggregate statistics suggest a close link between TFP fl uctuations and the business cycle, and of course there has been a long ongoing debate about the meaning of that link. That is, does measured TFP capture actual exogenous changes in productivity, or is there labor hoarding, and so forth, that leads to endogenous movement in TFP? In this paper, exogenous shocks to labor productivity drive the business cycle. However, the implications for economywide TFP are not so clear. In the model, an increase in the productivity level of all fi rms draws less productive fi rms into production. Average productivity, as measured by the simple average of productivity over all fi rms in the economy, is infl uenced not only by the increase in productivity of fi rms
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信