蛋白质组学方法在自身炎症疾病分类中的比较

Orestis D. Papagiannopoulos, C. Papaloukas, V. Pezoulas, Harmen van de Werken, C. Poulet, Y. Mueller, P. Katsikis, D. Seny, D. Fotiadis
{"title":"蛋白质组学方法在自身炎症疾病分类中的比较","authors":"Orestis D. Papagiannopoulos, C. Papaloukas, V. Pezoulas, Harmen van de Werken, C. Poulet, Y. Mueller, P. Katsikis, D. Seny, D. Fotiadis","doi":"10.1109/BHI56158.2022.9926877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A cross-analysis study was conducted to compare proteomic platforms in classifying patients with Systemic Autoinflammatory diseases, using proteins extracted from different profiling experiments. The datasets used were obtained from SomaScan assays and Mass Spectrometry (MS). A separate analysis was performed to each dataset based on the false discovery rate (FDR) in order to extract statistically important proteins. Conventional machine learning algorithms were subsequently employed to evaluate the denoted proteins as candidate biomarkers and compare the predictive capabilities of the two proteomic platforms. Using the SomaScan assay, we managed to achieve higher classification metrics compared to the MS dataset. An improvement was also attained on the classification results when the features used were extracted from the MS data and applied on the SomaScan dataset, compared to the opposite combination. Finally, the proteins derived from the FDR analysis in both datasets proved to be highly correlated regarding their importance score.","PeriodicalId":347210,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics (BHI)","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Proteomic Approaches in Autoinflammatory Disease Classification\",\"authors\":\"Orestis D. Papagiannopoulos, C. Papaloukas, V. Pezoulas, Harmen van de Werken, C. Poulet, Y. Mueller, P. Katsikis, D. Seny, D. Fotiadis\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/BHI56158.2022.9926877\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A cross-analysis study was conducted to compare proteomic platforms in classifying patients with Systemic Autoinflammatory diseases, using proteins extracted from different profiling experiments. The datasets used were obtained from SomaScan assays and Mass Spectrometry (MS). A separate analysis was performed to each dataset based on the false discovery rate (FDR) in order to extract statistically important proteins. Conventional machine learning algorithms were subsequently employed to evaluate the denoted proteins as candidate biomarkers and compare the predictive capabilities of the two proteomic platforms. Using the SomaScan assay, we managed to achieve higher classification metrics compared to the MS dataset. An improvement was also attained on the classification results when the features used were extracted from the MS data and applied on the SomaScan dataset, compared to the opposite combination. Finally, the proteins derived from the FDR analysis in both datasets proved to be highly correlated regarding their importance score.\",\"PeriodicalId\":347210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 IEEE-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics (BHI)\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 IEEE-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics (BHI)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/BHI56158.2022.9926877\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics (BHI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/BHI56158.2022.9926877","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们进行了一项交叉分析研究,比较蛋白质组学平台对全身性自身炎症疾病患者的分类,使用从不同分析实验中提取的蛋白质。使用的数据集来自SomaScan测定和质谱(MS)。根据错误发现率(FDR)对每个数据集进行单独分析,以提取统计上重要的蛋白质。随后采用传统的机器学习算法来评估标记的蛋白质作为候选生物标志物,并比较两种蛋白质组学平台的预测能力。使用SomaScan分析,与MS数据集相比,我们成功实现了更高的分类指标。与相反的组合相比,当从MS数据中提取所使用的特征并应用于SomaScan数据集时,分类结果也得到了改进。最后,从两个数据集的FDR分析中得出的蛋白质在其重要性评分方面被证明是高度相关的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Proteomic Approaches in Autoinflammatory Disease Classification
A cross-analysis study was conducted to compare proteomic platforms in classifying patients with Systemic Autoinflammatory diseases, using proteins extracted from different profiling experiments. The datasets used were obtained from SomaScan assays and Mass Spectrometry (MS). A separate analysis was performed to each dataset based on the false discovery rate (FDR) in order to extract statistically important proteins. Conventional machine learning algorithms were subsequently employed to evaluate the denoted proteins as candidate biomarkers and compare the predictive capabilities of the two proteomic platforms. Using the SomaScan assay, we managed to achieve higher classification metrics compared to the MS dataset. An improvement was also attained on the classification results when the features used were extracted from the MS data and applied on the SomaScan dataset, compared to the opposite combination. Finally, the proteins derived from the FDR analysis in both datasets proved to be highly correlated regarding their importance score.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信