辅导心理学:作为核心参照系的美学

G. Wills
{"title":"辅导心理学:作为核心参照系的美学","authors":"G. Wills","doi":"10.59158/001c.71191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is a response to an assumption in Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT) theory that core beliefs are central to the existence of client distress and to the mitigation of it. The paper contains an analysis of the verbal content of a demonstration of CBT therapy in Module 1 of a course, “CBT Fundamentals” provided by the Australian Psychological Society, and a case is made supporting the proposition that the methods that privilege the search for, and manipulation of, core beliefs is too parsimonious a way of explaining both the processes and outcomes of otherwise high quality therapy. An alternative view is canvassed to the effect that the aesthetic qualities present in the work of Nick, the therapist who demonstrated CBT, are what better account for the successful work. Meta-analyses of research, supposed to give evidence of the superior effectiveness of CBT, are also reviewed and contextualised. The concept of the aesthetic is then placed within philosophical and humanist-existential frameworks claimed to be used by humanist/existential counselling psychologists. Finally, researchable questions are suggested as ways of exploring and validating the claims made in this paper. Public Health Significance: The paper provides a challenge to scientism embedded in the theory and practice of Cognitive Behaviour Therapy. The challenge is the author’s way of highlighting the distancing that arises from objectification of client problems. It is also intended as a challenge to the scientism that presently pervades psychology as a discipline.","PeriodicalId":394035,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy and Counselling Journal of Australia","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Counselling Psychology: Aesthetics as a Core Frame of Reference\",\"authors\":\"G. Wills\",\"doi\":\"10.59158/001c.71191\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article is a response to an assumption in Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT) theory that core beliefs are central to the existence of client distress and to the mitigation of it. The paper contains an analysis of the verbal content of a demonstration of CBT therapy in Module 1 of a course, “CBT Fundamentals” provided by the Australian Psychological Society, and a case is made supporting the proposition that the methods that privilege the search for, and manipulation of, core beliefs is too parsimonious a way of explaining both the processes and outcomes of otherwise high quality therapy. An alternative view is canvassed to the effect that the aesthetic qualities present in the work of Nick, the therapist who demonstrated CBT, are what better account for the successful work. Meta-analyses of research, supposed to give evidence of the superior effectiveness of CBT, are also reviewed and contextualised. The concept of the aesthetic is then placed within philosophical and humanist-existential frameworks claimed to be used by humanist/existential counselling psychologists. Finally, researchable questions are suggested as ways of exploring and validating the claims made in this paper. Public Health Significance: The paper provides a challenge to scientism embedded in the theory and practice of Cognitive Behaviour Therapy. The challenge is the author’s way of highlighting the distancing that arises from objectification of client problems. It is also intended as a challenge to the scientism that presently pervades psychology as a discipline.\",\"PeriodicalId\":394035,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychotherapy and Counselling Journal of Australia\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychotherapy and Counselling Journal of Australia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.59158/001c.71191\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapy and Counselling Journal of Australia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59158/001c.71191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文是对认知行为疗法(CBT)理论中一个假设的回应,即核心信念是客户困扰存在和缓解困扰的核心。本文对澳大利亚心理学会(Australian Psychological Society)提供的“CBT Fundamentals”课程模块1中的CBT治疗演示的口头内容进行了分析,并提出了一个案例来支持这样一个命题,即对核心信念的搜索和操纵给予特权的方法,在解释高质量治疗的过程和结果时过于简约。另一种观点是,展示CBT的治疗师尼克的作品中呈现的美学品质是成功作品的更好解释。研究的荟萃分析,本应提供证据的卓越有效性的认知行为治疗,也审查和背景。美学概念随后被置于哲学和人文主义-存在主义框架中,这些框架被人文主义/存在主义咨询心理学家所使用。最后,提出了可研究的问题,作为探索和验证本文所述主张的方法。公共卫生意义:本文对认知行为疗法的理论和实践中的科学主义提出了挑战。挑战在于作者强调客户问题客观化产生的距离感的方式。它也意在挑战目前作为一门学科普遍存在的心理学的科学主义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Counselling Psychology: Aesthetics as a Core Frame of Reference
This article is a response to an assumption in Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT) theory that core beliefs are central to the existence of client distress and to the mitigation of it. The paper contains an analysis of the verbal content of a demonstration of CBT therapy in Module 1 of a course, “CBT Fundamentals” provided by the Australian Psychological Society, and a case is made supporting the proposition that the methods that privilege the search for, and manipulation of, core beliefs is too parsimonious a way of explaining both the processes and outcomes of otherwise high quality therapy. An alternative view is canvassed to the effect that the aesthetic qualities present in the work of Nick, the therapist who demonstrated CBT, are what better account for the successful work. Meta-analyses of research, supposed to give evidence of the superior effectiveness of CBT, are also reviewed and contextualised. The concept of the aesthetic is then placed within philosophical and humanist-existential frameworks claimed to be used by humanist/existential counselling psychologists. Finally, researchable questions are suggested as ways of exploring and validating the claims made in this paper. Public Health Significance: The paper provides a challenge to scientism embedded in the theory and practice of Cognitive Behaviour Therapy. The challenge is the author’s way of highlighting the distancing that arises from objectification of client problems. It is also intended as a challenge to the scientism that presently pervades psychology as a discipline.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信