{"title":"6829张磁共振图像显示,与性别、年龄或关节炎程度无关,股骨外侧髁相对于内侧髁发育不全","authors":"R. Shah, T. Vail, S. Bini","doi":"10.60118/001c.68135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Understanding the relationship between the radii of the medial/lateral femoral condyles (MFC/LFC respectively) is important for restoring kinematics in knee arthroplasty. The objective of this study is to use a large cohort of patient magnetic resonance Images (MRIs) to investigate whether asymmetry exists between the radii of the medial/lateral femoral condyles. Patients recruited into the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) with knee MRIs were included. Using a validated machine learning algorithm, the radii of each condyle was calculated. The study sample was split into cohorts depending on medial and lateral compartment wear patterns of each knee in addition to their KL classification. The radii of each condyle in each cohort were compared using paired t-tests. Finally, a multivariable regression was run to evaluate factors that could impact differences between medial/lateral condylar size. 6,829 MRIs were included in this study of which 89% were classified as varus knees. The average best fit radius of the MFC was significantly smaller than that of the LFC (15.3mm vs. 16.8mm, p<0.001) in general and in patient knees with medial wear with KL 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4 and patient knees with lateral wear with KL 0, 2, 3, and 4. After adjusting for age, BMI, and Gender, patients with lateral wear patterns and patients with increasing KL score had a statistically significant larger lateral condylar size. ML was effectively used to automate the measurement of femoral condyle size suggesting that the LCF has a slightly larger radius than the MFC and is not hypoplastic.","PeriodicalId":298624,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Experience & Innovation","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Lateral Femoral Condyle is not Hypoplastic Relative to the Medial Condyle in 6829 Magnetic Resonance Images Irrespective of Gender, Age, or Extent of Arthritis\",\"authors\":\"R. Shah, T. Vail, S. Bini\",\"doi\":\"10.60118/001c.68135\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Understanding the relationship between the radii of the medial/lateral femoral condyles (MFC/LFC respectively) is important for restoring kinematics in knee arthroplasty. The objective of this study is to use a large cohort of patient magnetic resonance Images (MRIs) to investigate whether asymmetry exists between the radii of the medial/lateral femoral condyles. Patients recruited into the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) with knee MRIs were included. Using a validated machine learning algorithm, the radii of each condyle was calculated. The study sample was split into cohorts depending on medial and lateral compartment wear patterns of each knee in addition to their KL classification. The radii of each condyle in each cohort were compared using paired t-tests. Finally, a multivariable regression was run to evaluate factors that could impact differences between medial/lateral condylar size. 6,829 MRIs were included in this study of which 89% were classified as varus knees. The average best fit radius of the MFC was significantly smaller than that of the LFC (15.3mm vs. 16.8mm, p<0.001) in general and in patient knees with medial wear with KL 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4 and patient knees with lateral wear with KL 0, 2, 3, and 4. After adjusting for age, BMI, and Gender, patients with lateral wear patterns and patients with increasing KL score had a statistically significant larger lateral condylar size. ML was effectively used to automate the measurement of femoral condyle size suggesting that the LCF has a slightly larger radius than the MFC and is not hypoplastic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":298624,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Experience & Innovation\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Experience & Innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.60118/001c.68135\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Experience & Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.60118/001c.68135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
了解股骨内侧/外侧髁(分别为MFC/LFC)半径之间的关系对于膝关节置换术中恢复运动学非常重要。本研究的目的是使用大量患者磁共振图像(mri)来调查股骨内髁/外侧髁桡骨之间是否存在不对称。纳入骨关节炎倡议(OAI)并进行膝关节mri的患者。使用经过验证的机器学习算法,计算每个髁的半径。研究样本根据每个膝关节的内侧和外侧隔室磨损模式以及他们的KL分类被分成队列。每个队列中每个髁突的半径采用配对t检验进行比较。最后,采用多变量回归评估可能影响内外侧髁大小差异的因素。6829例mri纳入本研究,其中89%归类为膝内翻。总的来说,MFC的平均最佳配合半径明显小于LFC (15.3mm vs. 16.8mm, p<0.001),内侧磨损为KL 0、1、2、3和4的患者和外侧磨损为KL 0、2、3和4的患者的膝关节也明显小于LFC (15.3mm vs. 16.8mm, p<0.001)。在调整年龄、BMI和性别后,有外侧磨损模式的患者和KL评分增加的患者的外侧髁尺寸有统计学意义上的较大。ML被有效地用于自动测量股骨髁的大小,这表明LCF的半径比MFC略大,并且没有发育不良。
The Lateral Femoral Condyle is not Hypoplastic Relative to the Medial Condyle in 6829 Magnetic Resonance Images Irrespective of Gender, Age, or Extent of Arthritis
Understanding the relationship between the radii of the medial/lateral femoral condyles (MFC/LFC respectively) is important for restoring kinematics in knee arthroplasty. The objective of this study is to use a large cohort of patient magnetic resonance Images (MRIs) to investigate whether asymmetry exists between the radii of the medial/lateral femoral condyles. Patients recruited into the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) with knee MRIs were included. Using a validated machine learning algorithm, the radii of each condyle was calculated. The study sample was split into cohorts depending on medial and lateral compartment wear patterns of each knee in addition to their KL classification. The radii of each condyle in each cohort were compared using paired t-tests. Finally, a multivariable regression was run to evaluate factors that could impact differences between medial/lateral condylar size. 6,829 MRIs were included in this study of which 89% were classified as varus knees. The average best fit radius of the MFC was significantly smaller than that of the LFC (15.3mm vs. 16.8mm, p<0.001) in general and in patient knees with medial wear with KL 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4 and patient knees with lateral wear with KL 0, 2, 3, and 4. After adjusting for age, BMI, and Gender, patients with lateral wear patterns and patients with increasing KL score had a statistically significant larger lateral condylar size. ML was effectively used to automate the measurement of femoral condyle size suggesting that the LCF has a slightly larger radius than the MFC and is not hypoplastic.