螺旋断层成像引导放射治疗的设置误差分析

Bhagyalakshmi Akkavil Thondykandy, J. Swamidas, J. Agarwal, T. Gupta, S. Laskar, U. Mahantshetty, S. Iyer, Indrani U. Mukherjee, S. Shrivastava, D. Deshpande
{"title":"螺旋断层成像引导放射治疗的设置误差分析","authors":"Bhagyalakshmi Akkavil Thondykandy, J. Swamidas, J. Agarwal, T. Gupta, S. Laskar, U. Mahantshetty, S. Iyer, Indrani U. Mukherjee, S. Shrivastava, D. Deshpande","doi":"10.4103/0971-6203.170796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The adequacy of setup margins for various sites in patients treated with helical tomotherapy was investigated. A total of 102 patients were investigated. The breakdown of the patients were as follows: Twenty-five patients each in brain, head and neck (H and N), and pelvis, while 12 patients in lung and 15 in craniospinal irradiation (CSI). Patients were immobilized on the institutional protocol. Altogether 2686 megavoltage computed tomography images were analyzed with 672, 747, 622, 333, and 312 fractions, respectively, from brain, H and N, pelvis, lung, and CSI. Overall systematic and random errors were calculated in three translational and three rotational directions. Setup margins were evaluated using van Herk formula. The calculated margins were compared with the margins in the clinical use for various directions and sites. We found that the clinical isotropic margin of 3 mm was adequate for brain patients. However, in the longitudinal direction it was found to be out of margin by 0.7 mm. In H and N, the calculated margins were well within the isotropic margin of 5 mm which is in clinical use. In pelvis, the calculated margin was within the limits, 8.3 mm versus 10 mm only in longitudinal direction, however, in vertical and lateral directions the calculated margins were out of clinical margins 11 mm versus 10 mm, and 8.7 mm versus 7.0, mm respectively. In lung, all the calculated margins were well within the margins used clinically. In CSI, the variation was found in the middle spine in the longitudinal direction. The clinical margins used in our hospital are adequate enough for sites H and N, lung, and brain, however, for CSI and pelvis the margins were found to be out of clinical margins.","PeriodicalId":143694,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Physics / Association of Medical Physicists of India","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Setup error analysis in helical tomotherapy based image-guided radiation therapy treatments\",\"authors\":\"Bhagyalakshmi Akkavil Thondykandy, J. Swamidas, J. Agarwal, T. Gupta, S. Laskar, U. Mahantshetty, S. Iyer, Indrani U. Mukherjee, S. Shrivastava, D. Deshpande\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/0971-6203.170796\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The adequacy of setup margins for various sites in patients treated with helical tomotherapy was investigated. A total of 102 patients were investigated. The breakdown of the patients were as follows: Twenty-five patients each in brain, head and neck (H and N), and pelvis, while 12 patients in lung and 15 in craniospinal irradiation (CSI). Patients were immobilized on the institutional protocol. Altogether 2686 megavoltage computed tomography images were analyzed with 672, 747, 622, 333, and 312 fractions, respectively, from brain, H and N, pelvis, lung, and CSI. Overall systematic and random errors were calculated in three translational and three rotational directions. Setup margins were evaluated using van Herk formula. The calculated margins were compared with the margins in the clinical use for various directions and sites. We found that the clinical isotropic margin of 3 mm was adequate for brain patients. However, in the longitudinal direction it was found to be out of margin by 0.7 mm. In H and N, the calculated margins were well within the isotropic margin of 5 mm which is in clinical use. In pelvis, the calculated margin was within the limits, 8.3 mm versus 10 mm only in longitudinal direction, however, in vertical and lateral directions the calculated margins were out of clinical margins 11 mm versus 10 mm, and 8.7 mm versus 7.0, mm respectively. In lung, all the calculated margins were well within the margins used clinically. In CSI, the variation was found in the middle spine in the longitudinal direction. The clinical margins used in our hospital are adequate enough for sites H and N, lung, and brain, however, for CSI and pelvis the margins were found to be out of clinical margins.\",\"PeriodicalId\":143694,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Physics / Association of Medical Physicists of India\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Physics / Association of Medical Physicists of India\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.170796\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Physics / Association of Medical Physicists of India","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.170796","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

在接受螺旋断层治疗的患者中,对不同部位的设置边缘是否足够进行了研究。共调查102例患者。患者分类如下:脑、头颈(H、N)、骨盆各25例,肺12例,颅脑脊髓照射(CSI) 15例。患者按机构方案固定。共对2686张巨压计算机断层图像进行分析,分别为脑、H和N、骨盆、肺和CSI的672、747、622、333和312个分数。在三个平移和三个旋转方向上计算总体系统和随机误差。利用van Herk公式评估设置裕度。将计算出的切缘与临床在不同方向和部位使用的切缘进行比较。我们发现临床各向同性切缘为3mm对脑科患者是足够的。然而,在纵向上发现它超出了0.7毫米的边缘。在H和N中,计算的边缘在临床使用的各向同性边缘5mm内。在骨盆中,计算的边缘在一定范围内,仅在纵向上8.3 mm对10 mm,但在垂直和横向上计算的边缘分别超出临床边缘11 mm对10 mm, 8.7 mm对7.0 mm。在肺中,所有计算的边缘都在临床使用的边缘范围内。在CSI中,在纵向上发现了脊柱中部的变异。对于H、N、肺、脑等部位,我院所使用的临床边缘是足够的,而对于CSI、骨盆等部位,临床边缘是缺失的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Setup error analysis in helical tomotherapy based image-guided radiation therapy treatments
The adequacy of setup margins for various sites in patients treated with helical tomotherapy was investigated. A total of 102 patients were investigated. The breakdown of the patients were as follows: Twenty-five patients each in brain, head and neck (H and N), and pelvis, while 12 patients in lung and 15 in craniospinal irradiation (CSI). Patients were immobilized on the institutional protocol. Altogether 2686 megavoltage computed tomography images were analyzed with 672, 747, 622, 333, and 312 fractions, respectively, from brain, H and N, pelvis, lung, and CSI. Overall systematic and random errors were calculated in three translational and three rotational directions. Setup margins were evaluated using van Herk formula. The calculated margins were compared with the margins in the clinical use for various directions and sites. We found that the clinical isotropic margin of 3 mm was adequate for brain patients. However, in the longitudinal direction it was found to be out of margin by 0.7 mm. In H and N, the calculated margins were well within the isotropic margin of 5 mm which is in clinical use. In pelvis, the calculated margin was within the limits, 8.3 mm versus 10 mm only in longitudinal direction, however, in vertical and lateral directions the calculated margins were out of clinical margins 11 mm versus 10 mm, and 8.7 mm versus 7.0, mm respectively. In lung, all the calculated margins were well within the margins used clinically. In CSI, the variation was found in the middle spine in the longitudinal direction. The clinical margins used in our hospital are adequate enough for sites H and N, lung, and brain, however, for CSI and pelvis the margins were found to be out of clinical margins.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信