希腊文化的收获与“诺斯替主义”范畴

Michael Williams
{"title":"希腊文化的收获与“诺斯替主义”范畴","authors":"Michael Williams","doi":"10.1353/SYL.1996.0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Among the various forms of religious expression attested in die early Roman Empire mere is one assortment of phenomena that modern scholarship of die past two hundred years or so has come to group togetiier under the label \"gnosis\" or \"gnosticism.\"1 Many scholars today would locate die origins of \"gnosticism\" in preChristian circles of the late Hellenistic period-for example, widiin late Hellenistic Jewish circles. A majority of the surviving sources, however, are either Christian or \"Christianized,\" focusing on and interpreting central elements in Christian tradition (Christ as Savior, traditions from Christian gospels, etc.), or at least incorporating some Christian elements (e.g., vocabulary, ritual). The classic sources describing \"gnosis\" or \"gnosticism\" are in fact writings by ancient Christian heresiologists, from as early as the second century CE., who catalogued many such traditions and treated diem as deviant forms or corruptions of Christian truth, \"heresies.\" The lists of ancient \"heresies\" provided by the heresiologists include sects associated widi die names of various individual teachers, such as die Christian teachers Marcion, Valentinus, Basilides, Carpocrates, Cerinthus, or Satomil, but also groups that are labeled by die heresiologists based on some element of their alleged teaching (e.g., \"Sethians,\" because of dieir mytiis about die biblical figure Setii). We also have a certain number of surviving original writings from some of these alleged \"heretics\" themselves. This year in fact marks the fiftieth anniversary of the discovery of die largest single body of such original writings, a group of a dozen or so fourdi-century CE. codices, written in Coptic (though almost all of the writings in them are arguably translations from earlier Greek works), and found in 1945 near die Egyptian town of Nag Hammadi.2 The discovery and publication of the Nag","PeriodicalId":402432,"journal":{"name":"Syllecta Classica","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Harvest of Hellenism and the Category 'Gnosticism'\",\"authors\":\"Michael Williams\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/SYL.1996.0016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Among the various forms of religious expression attested in die early Roman Empire mere is one assortment of phenomena that modern scholarship of die past two hundred years or so has come to group togetiier under the label \\\"gnosis\\\" or \\\"gnosticism.\\\"1 Many scholars today would locate die origins of \\\"gnosticism\\\" in preChristian circles of the late Hellenistic period-for example, widiin late Hellenistic Jewish circles. A majority of the surviving sources, however, are either Christian or \\\"Christianized,\\\" focusing on and interpreting central elements in Christian tradition (Christ as Savior, traditions from Christian gospels, etc.), or at least incorporating some Christian elements (e.g., vocabulary, ritual). The classic sources describing \\\"gnosis\\\" or \\\"gnosticism\\\" are in fact writings by ancient Christian heresiologists, from as early as the second century CE., who catalogued many such traditions and treated diem as deviant forms or corruptions of Christian truth, \\\"heresies.\\\" The lists of ancient \\\"heresies\\\" provided by the heresiologists include sects associated widi die names of various individual teachers, such as die Christian teachers Marcion, Valentinus, Basilides, Carpocrates, Cerinthus, or Satomil, but also groups that are labeled by die heresiologists based on some element of their alleged teaching (e.g., \\\"Sethians,\\\" because of dieir mytiis about die biblical figure Setii). We also have a certain number of surviving original writings from some of these alleged \\\"heretics\\\" themselves. This year in fact marks the fiftieth anniversary of the discovery of die largest single body of such original writings, a group of a dozen or so fourdi-century CE. codices, written in Coptic (though almost all of the writings in them are arguably translations from earlier Greek works), and found in 1945 near die Egyptian town of Nag Hammadi.2 The discovery and publication of the Nag\",\"PeriodicalId\":402432,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Syllecta Classica\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Syllecta Classica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/SYL.1996.0016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Syllecta Classica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/SYL.1996.0016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在罗马帝国早期证实的各种形式的宗教表达中,只有一种现象是过去200年左右的现代学者在“灵知”或“灵知主义”的标签下聚集在一起的。1今天许多学者将“诺斯替主义”的起源定位于希腊化晚期的前基督教圈子——例如,在希腊化晚期的犹太人圈子里。然而,大多数幸存的来源,要么是基督教的,要么是“基督教化的”,关注和解释基督教传统的核心要素(基督作为救世主,基督教福音书的传统等),或者至少结合一些基督教元素(例如,词汇,仪式)。描述“灵知”或“灵知主义”的经典资料实际上是古代基督教异端学家的著作,最早可以追溯到公元二世纪。他列举了许多这样的传统,并将其视为基督教真理的异端形式或腐败,即“异端”。由异端学家提供的古代“异端”名单包括与各种个别教师的名字相关的教派,例如基督教教师马吉安,瓦伦丁努斯,巴西利德斯,卡波克拉底,Cerinthus或Satomil,但也有一些团体被异端学家根据他们所谓的教学元素贴上标签(例如,“Sethians”,因为他们对圣经人物Setii的看法)。我们也有一些幸存的原始作品,来自这些所谓的“异端”本身。事实上,今年是发现这类原创作品中最大的一个实体的五十周年纪念日,这是一组大约在公元四世纪的十几件作品。这些古抄本是用科普特语写的(尽管其中几乎所有的文字都有争议地翻译自早期的希腊作品),于1945年在埃及的Nag hammadi镇附近被发现
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Harvest of Hellenism and the Category 'Gnosticism'
Among the various forms of religious expression attested in die early Roman Empire mere is one assortment of phenomena that modern scholarship of die past two hundred years or so has come to group togetiier under the label "gnosis" or "gnosticism."1 Many scholars today would locate die origins of "gnosticism" in preChristian circles of the late Hellenistic period-for example, widiin late Hellenistic Jewish circles. A majority of the surviving sources, however, are either Christian or "Christianized," focusing on and interpreting central elements in Christian tradition (Christ as Savior, traditions from Christian gospels, etc.), or at least incorporating some Christian elements (e.g., vocabulary, ritual). The classic sources describing "gnosis" or "gnosticism" are in fact writings by ancient Christian heresiologists, from as early as the second century CE., who catalogued many such traditions and treated diem as deviant forms or corruptions of Christian truth, "heresies." The lists of ancient "heresies" provided by the heresiologists include sects associated widi die names of various individual teachers, such as die Christian teachers Marcion, Valentinus, Basilides, Carpocrates, Cerinthus, or Satomil, but also groups that are labeled by die heresiologists based on some element of their alleged teaching (e.g., "Sethians," because of dieir mytiis about die biblical figure Setii). We also have a certain number of surviving original writings from some of these alleged "heretics" themselves. This year in fact marks the fiftieth anniversary of the discovery of die largest single body of such original writings, a group of a dozen or so fourdi-century CE. codices, written in Coptic (though almost all of the writings in them are arguably translations from earlier Greek works), and found in 1945 near die Egyptian town of Nag Hammadi.2 The discovery and publication of the Nag
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信