{"title":"教育即政治","authors":"P. Standish","doi":"10.7571/ESJKYOIKU.13.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many approaches to political education take it to involve the \nconstruction of particular sections of the curriculum in which political \nmatters are addressed – named perhaps “civics” or “citizenship \neducation”. While these approaches have often been beneficial, they \nare all also problematic and controversial in some degree. Moreover, it \nis sometimes said that political education operates across a wide \nrange of what happens in educational institutions – for example, in \nthe ways of behaving that are promoted inside and outside the \nclassroom, in the general ethos of the school or college, and through \nits marking of significant dates or events. The approach adopted in \nthis paper takes a more radical line, however, in that it resists the \nrestriction of the political that these approaches assume. This is not to \nargue for the mobilization of schools and other educational \ninstitutions as instruments of politics. It is rather to try to show that \nmatters of political significance are pervasive of the curriculum. The \nsubstance of the curriculum is an expression of what the culture \ntakes to be important and of the values that the culture wishes to \npass on. The fostering of those values must have some effect on the \nkind of society that is then promoted, and indeed this must be \ninherent in the aims of education.","PeriodicalId":205276,"journal":{"name":"Educational Studies in Japan","volume":"229 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Educational is Political\",\"authors\":\"P. Standish\",\"doi\":\"10.7571/ESJKYOIKU.13.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many approaches to political education take it to involve the \\nconstruction of particular sections of the curriculum in which political \\nmatters are addressed – named perhaps “civics” or “citizenship \\neducation”. While these approaches have often been beneficial, they \\nare all also problematic and controversial in some degree. Moreover, it \\nis sometimes said that political education operates across a wide \\nrange of what happens in educational institutions – for example, in \\nthe ways of behaving that are promoted inside and outside the \\nclassroom, in the general ethos of the school or college, and through \\nits marking of significant dates or events. The approach adopted in \\nthis paper takes a more radical line, however, in that it resists the \\nrestriction of the political that these approaches assume. This is not to \\nargue for the mobilization of schools and other educational \\ninstitutions as instruments of politics. It is rather to try to show that \\nmatters of political significance are pervasive of the curriculum. The \\nsubstance of the curriculum is an expression of what the culture \\ntakes to be important and of the values that the culture wishes to \\npass on. The fostering of those values must have some effect on the \\nkind of society that is then promoted, and indeed this must be \\ninherent in the aims of education.\",\"PeriodicalId\":205276,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Educational Studies in Japan\",\"volume\":\"229 \",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Educational Studies in Japan\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7571/ESJKYOIKU.13.5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Studies in Japan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7571/ESJKYOIKU.13.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Many approaches to political education take it to involve the
construction of particular sections of the curriculum in which political
matters are addressed – named perhaps “civics” or “citizenship
education”. While these approaches have often been beneficial, they
are all also problematic and controversial in some degree. Moreover, it
is sometimes said that political education operates across a wide
range of what happens in educational institutions – for example, in
the ways of behaving that are promoted inside and outside the
classroom, in the general ethos of the school or college, and through
its marking of significant dates or events. The approach adopted in
this paper takes a more radical line, however, in that it resists the
restriction of the political that these approaches assume. This is not to
argue for the mobilization of schools and other educational
institutions as instruments of politics. It is rather to try to show that
matters of political significance are pervasive of the curriculum. The
substance of the curriculum is an expression of what the culture
takes to be important and of the values that the culture wishes to
pass on. The fostering of those values must have some effect on the
kind of society that is then promoted, and indeed this must be
inherent in the aims of education.