北美自由贸易协定的公共服务方法

J. Vanduzer
{"title":"北美自由贸易协定的公共服务方法","authors":"J. Vanduzer","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2389152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Public services are treated differently in the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) compared to the WTO General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) and European Union (EU) trade treaties. The approach in NAFTA, which is followed in many bilateral and regional agreements worldwide, has three main distinctive characteristics: 1. NAFTA is a negative list agreement – meaning that all of the obligations in the treaty, including those related to services and investment, apply to all state actions except to the extent specifically carved out through reservations or exceptions. GATS and EU trade treaties to date are positive list agreements in which many obligations only apply to sectors listed by each party. 2. NAFTA contains no general exception from all treaty obligations for public services. There is no exception for services delivered in the exercise of governmental authority as is found in the GATS and many EU trade treaties, nor is there any unifying concept of public services in the treaty. Instead, there are a variety of limited exceptions and country-specific reservations that exclude the application of certain treaty obligations to some identified kinds public services and to specific measures that may be related to public services, like subsidies. 3. NAFTA contains comprehensive obligations relating to investment, which are not found in the GATS or EU trade treaties. These obligations are similar to those found in the bilateral investment treaties of EU member states.Because it relies on reservations for lists of services instead of a general exception that excludes all services that have the character of public services, NAFTA’s protection of state regulatory freedom in relation to public services is arguably more certain but over-inclusive for public services that are named in reservations and under-inclusive for public services that are not specifically named. Some public service activities, like waste removal, are not the subject of any special rules. All NAFTA’s investment and services obligations apply to these services. Others, like postal services, are subject to reservations from some obligations but some of these apply to only one country. Some NAFTA obligations, notably the Parties’ obligations not to expropriate investments without compensation and to provide fair and equitable treatment to investments, apply to all public services. No reservations are permitted. The broad scope of NAFTA’s investment obligations and their ability to constrain the public service policy choices of NAFTA countries render their application to public services a particular concern. NAFTA has not be updated to adopt some of the limitations on investment obligations that that Canada and the US now routinely incorporate in their treaties, such as a specification of when an indirect expropriation occurs and, in Canada’s case, the application of GATT Article XX-like exceptions to investment obligations.","PeriodicalId":243835,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Law eJournal","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"NAFTA's Approach to Public Services\",\"authors\":\"J. Vanduzer\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2389152\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Public services are treated differently in the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) compared to the WTO General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) and European Union (EU) trade treaties. The approach in NAFTA, which is followed in many bilateral and regional agreements worldwide, has three main distinctive characteristics: 1. NAFTA is a negative list agreement – meaning that all of the obligations in the treaty, including those related to services and investment, apply to all state actions except to the extent specifically carved out through reservations or exceptions. GATS and EU trade treaties to date are positive list agreements in which many obligations only apply to sectors listed by each party. 2. NAFTA contains no general exception from all treaty obligations for public services. There is no exception for services delivered in the exercise of governmental authority as is found in the GATS and many EU trade treaties, nor is there any unifying concept of public services in the treaty. Instead, there are a variety of limited exceptions and country-specific reservations that exclude the application of certain treaty obligations to some identified kinds public services and to specific measures that may be related to public services, like subsidies. 3. NAFTA contains comprehensive obligations relating to investment, which are not found in the GATS or EU trade treaties. These obligations are similar to those found in the bilateral investment treaties of EU member states.Because it relies on reservations for lists of services instead of a general exception that excludes all services that have the character of public services, NAFTA’s protection of state regulatory freedom in relation to public services is arguably more certain but over-inclusive for public services that are named in reservations and under-inclusive for public services that are not specifically named. Some public service activities, like waste removal, are not the subject of any special rules. All NAFTA’s investment and services obligations apply to these services. Others, like postal services, are subject to reservations from some obligations but some of these apply to only one country. Some NAFTA obligations, notably the Parties’ obligations not to expropriate investments without compensation and to provide fair and equitable treatment to investments, apply to all public services. No reservations are permitted. The broad scope of NAFTA’s investment obligations and their ability to constrain the public service policy choices of NAFTA countries render their application to public services a particular concern. NAFTA has not be updated to adopt some of the limitations on investment obligations that that Canada and the US now routinely incorporate in their treaties, such as a specification of when an indirect expropriation occurs and, in Canada’s case, the application of GATT Article XX-like exceptions to investment obligations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":243835,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Law eJournal\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Law eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2389152\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2389152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与世界贸易组织服务贸易总协定(GATS)和欧盟贸易条约相比,北美自由贸易协定(NAFTA)对公共服务的待遇有所不同。北美自由贸易协定的做法是世界上许多双边和区域协定所遵循的,它有三个主要特点:1。北美自由贸易协定是一项负面清单协议,这意味着条约中的所有义务,包括与服务和投资有关的义务,适用于所有国家的行为,除非通过保留或例外明确规定。迄今为止,服务贸易总协定和欧盟贸易条约都是正面清单协议,其中许多义务仅适用于各方列出的部门。2. 北美自由贸易协定没有对公共服务的所有条约义务的一般例外。在服务贸易总协定和许多欧盟贸易条约中,在行使政府权力时提供的服务没有例外,条约中也没有任何统一的公共服务概念。相反,有各种有限的例外和针对具体国家的保留,排除了某些条约义务适用于某些确定的公共服务种类和可能与公共服务有关的具体措施,如补贴。3.北美自由贸易协定包含与投资有关的全面义务,这些义务在服务贸易总协定或欧盟贸易条约中没有。这些义务类似于欧盟成员国双边投资条约中的义务。因为它依赖于对服务清单的保留,而不是排除所有具有公共服务特征的服务的一般例外,北美自由贸易协定在公共服务方面对国家监管自由的保护可以说是更确定的,但对保留中指定的公共服务过于包容,而对未具体指定的公共服务则不太包容。一些公共服务活动,如垃圾清除,不受任何特殊规定的约束。所有北美自由贸易协定的投资和服务义务适用于这些服务。其他的,如邮政服务,对某些义务有保留,但其中一些只适用于一个国家。《北美自由贸易协定》的一些义务,特别是各缔约方不无偿征用投资和对投资提供公平和公平待遇的义务,适用于所有公共服务。不允许预订。北美自由贸易协定的投资义务范围很广,而且它们有能力限制北美自由贸易协定国家的公共服务政策选择,这使它们适用于公共服务成为一个特别令人关切的问题。北美自由贸易协定尚未更新,以采用加拿大和美国目前在其条约中例行纳入的对投资义务的一些限制,例如间接征收何时发生的说明,以及在加拿大的情况下,对投资义务适用GATT第20条类似的例外情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
NAFTA's Approach to Public Services
Public services are treated differently in the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) compared to the WTO General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) and European Union (EU) trade treaties. The approach in NAFTA, which is followed in many bilateral and regional agreements worldwide, has three main distinctive characteristics: 1. NAFTA is a negative list agreement – meaning that all of the obligations in the treaty, including those related to services and investment, apply to all state actions except to the extent specifically carved out through reservations or exceptions. GATS and EU trade treaties to date are positive list agreements in which many obligations only apply to sectors listed by each party. 2. NAFTA contains no general exception from all treaty obligations for public services. There is no exception for services delivered in the exercise of governmental authority as is found in the GATS and many EU trade treaties, nor is there any unifying concept of public services in the treaty. Instead, there are a variety of limited exceptions and country-specific reservations that exclude the application of certain treaty obligations to some identified kinds public services and to specific measures that may be related to public services, like subsidies. 3. NAFTA contains comprehensive obligations relating to investment, which are not found in the GATS or EU trade treaties. These obligations are similar to those found in the bilateral investment treaties of EU member states.Because it relies on reservations for lists of services instead of a general exception that excludes all services that have the character of public services, NAFTA’s protection of state regulatory freedom in relation to public services is arguably more certain but over-inclusive for public services that are named in reservations and under-inclusive for public services that are not specifically named. Some public service activities, like waste removal, are not the subject of any special rules. All NAFTA’s investment and services obligations apply to these services. Others, like postal services, are subject to reservations from some obligations but some of these apply to only one country. Some NAFTA obligations, notably the Parties’ obligations not to expropriate investments without compensation and to provide fair and equitable treatment to investments, apply to all public services. No reservations are permitted. The broad scope of NAFTA’s investment obligations and their ability to constrain the public service policy choices of NAFTA countries render their application to public services a particular concern. NAFTA has not be updated to adopt some of the limitations on investment obligations that that Canada and the US now routinely incorporate in their treaties, such as a specification of when an indirect expropriation occurs and, in Canada’s case, the application of GATT Article XX-like exceptions to investment obligations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信