边际效用被认为是对过去传统的回归

Richard Stomper
{"title":"边际效用被认为是对过去传统的回归","authors":"Richard Stomper","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3007181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the marginal utility as a theory of value in comparison with the theories which preceded it. It compares in detail the utility theory with the predominant theory of value of classical economics, a cost theory which saw labor as the ultimate source of value. By introducing a “subjective” element into the basic determinant of value, the marginal theory did more than just revolutionize the then current economic thinking. It was able to hark back to the best of the ancient theories of value which saw moral economic activity as necessarily involving an exchange of true value to the participants.","PeriodicalId":237187,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Production; Cost; Capital & Total Factor Productivity; Value Theory (Topic)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Marginal Utility Considered as a Return to Past Traditions\",\"authors\":\"Richard Stomper\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3007181\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper examines the marginal utility as a theory of value in comparison with the theories which preceded it. It compares in detail the utility theory with the predominant theory of value of classical economics, a cost theory which saw labor as the ultimate source of value. By introducing a “subjective” element into the basic determinant of value, the marginal theory did more than just revolutionize the then current economic thinking. It was able to hark back to the best of the ancient theories of value which saw moral economic activity as necessarily involving an exchange of true value to the participants.\",\"PeriodicalId\":237187,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Production; Cost; Capital & Total Factor Productivity; Value Theory (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Production; Cost; Capital & Total Factor Productivity; Value Theory (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3007181\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Production; Cost; Capital & Total Factor Productivity; Value Theory (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3007181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文将边际效用作为一种价值理论进行考察,并与之前的理论进行比较。它将效用理论与古典经济学中占主导地位的价值理论进行了详细的比较,后者是一种视劳动为最终价值来源的成本理论。通过将“主观”因素引入价值的基本决定因素,边际理论不仅仅是彻底改变了当时流行的经济思想。它可以追溯到古代价值理论的精华,即道德经济活动必然涉及到参与者之间真正价值的交换。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Marginal Utility Considered as a Return to Past Traditions
This paper examines the marginal utility as a theory of value in comparison with the theories which preceded it. It compares in detail the utility theory with the predominant theory of value of classical economics, a cost theory which saw labor as the ultimate source of value. By introducing a “subjective” element into the basic determinant of value, the marginal theory did more than just revolutionize the then current economic thinking. It was able to hark back to the best of the ancient theories of value which saw moral economic activity as necessarily involving an exchange of true value to the participants.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信