{"title":"一个可能的巴比伦先驱的理论的蜕化","authors":"M. van der Sluijs","doi":"10.46472/cc.0209.0203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It has repeatedly been proposed that the classical theory of the Great Year had its origins in Babylonia. Attempts to substantiate this connection were frustrated by the absence of the motif of an ecpyrosis or ‘world fire’ in Mesopotamian literature. The Neo-Babylonian text Erra and Isum may fill this gap.","PeriodicalId":152044,"journal":{"name":"Culture and Cosmos","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Possible Babylonian Precursor to the Theory of ecpyrosis\",\"authors\":\"M. van der Sluijs\",\"doi\":\"10.46472/cc.0209.0203\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It has repeatedly been proposed that the classical theory of the Great Year had its origins in Babylonia. Attempts to substantiate this connection were frustrated by the absence of the motif of an ecpyrosis or ‘world fire’ in Mesopotamian literature. The Neo-Babylonian text Erra and Isum may fill this gap.\",\"PeriodicalId\":152044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Culture and Cosmos\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Culture and Cosmos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46472/cc.0209.0203\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Culture and Cosmos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46472/cc.0209.0203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
人们一再提出,大年的古典理论起源于巴比伦。由于美索不达米亚文学中没有“世界之火”或“世界之火”的母题,试图证实这种联系的努力受到了挫折。新巴比伦文本《Erra and Isum》可能填补了这一空白。
A Possible Babylonian Precursor to the Theory of ecpyrosis
It has repeatedly been proposed that the classical theory of the Great Year had its origins in Babylonia. Attempts to substantiate this connection were frustrated by the absence of the motif of an ecpyrosis or ‘world fire’ in Mesopotamian literature. The Neo-Babylonian text Erra and Isum may fill this gap.