公共社会保障支出与贫困、收入不平等和Gdp增长的关系——以孟加拉国为例

Mohammad Abdul Hannan Pradhan, Rahim Quazi
{"title":"公共社会保障支出与贫困、收入不平等和Gdp增长的关系——以孟加拉国为例","authors":"Mohammad Abdul Hannan Pradhan, Rahim Quazi","doi":"10.1353/jda.2022.0064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:During recent years, public social security programs for the poor and vulnerable groups in Bangladesh have grown both in number and size. The primary goal of these programs is to lift people out of poverty and to contribute to national economic development. The objective of this article is to quantify the relationship between public social security expenditures and poverty, income inequality, and GDP growth in Bangladesh. The study uses multivariate time series data from 1991 to 2019 and applies the Johansen cointegration test and the Vector Error Correction (VEC) modeling methodology. There are three dependent variables-poverty rate, Gini coefficient, and GDP growth rate, while public social security expenses, GDP per capita, active working-age population aged 1564, elderly population aged above 65, gross capital formation, share of population aged 25-64 with tertiary (post-secondary) education, inflation, and export earnings as a share of GDP are used as the explanatory variables. The estimated results suggest that public social security expenditures have significant effects on gross capital formation, but not on either poverty or income inequality in the short run in Bangladesh. In addition, capital formation, public social security expenditures, elderly population, and export earnings are found to have significant positive effects on GDP growth in the long run. Higher levels of GDP should generate more resources for the government coffers, enabling the government to expand the social security programs by targeting higher numbers of beneficiaries and offering higher amounts of benefits, which in turn can contribute to further GDP growth. This study also finds that public social security expenditures have no significant effect on income inequality in Bangladesh in either short run or long run. However, the general hypothesis is that social security transfers to lower-income groups may help with reducing income inequality. In many developing countries, governments allocate and distribute inadequate amounts of money to targeted communities, which results in only marginal changes in inequality. The lesson for the policymakers in Bangladesh is to overhaul the existing social security programs that evidently have had marginal effects on reducing income inequality, and may even have worsened poverty in the long run.","PeriodicalId":286315,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Developing Areas","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Relationship Between Public Social Security Expenditures and Poverty, Income Inequality, and Gdp Growth: An Empirical Case Study of Bangladesh\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Abdul Hannan Pradhan, Rahim Quazi\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/jda.2022.0064\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT:During recent years, public social security programs for the poor and vulnerable groups in Bangladesh have grown both in number and size. The primary goal of these programs is to lift people out of poverty and to contribute to national economic development. The objective of this article is to quantify the relationship between public social security expenditures and poverty, income inequality, and GDP growth in Bangladesh. The study uses multivariate time series data from 1991 to 2019 and applies the Johansen cointegration test and the Vector Error Correction (VEC) modeling methodology. There are three dependent variables-poverty rate, Gini coefficient, and GDP growth rate, while public social security expenses, GDP per capita, active working-age population aged 1564, elderly population aged above 65, gross capital formation, share of population aged 25-64 with tertiary (post-secondary) education, inflation, and export earnings as a share of GDP are used as the explanatory variables. The estimated results suggest that public social security expenditures have significant effects on gross capital formation, but not on either poverty or income inequality in the short run in Bangladesh. In addition, capital formation, public social security expenditures, elderly population, and export earnings are found to have significant positive effects on GDP growth in the long run. Higher levels of GDP should generate more resources for the government coffers, enabling the government to expand the social security programs by targeting higher numbers of beneficiaries and offering higher amounts of benefits, which in turn can contribute to further GDP growth. This study also finds that public social security expenditures have no significant effect on income inequality in Bangladesh in either short run or long run. However, the general hypothesis is that social security transfers to lower-income groups may help with reducing income inequality. In many developing countries, governments allocate and distribute inadequate amounts of money to targeted communities, which results in only marginal changes in inequality. The lesson for the policymakers in Bangladesh is to overhaul the existing social security programs that evidently have had marginal effects on reducing income inequality, and may even have worsened poverty in the long run.\",\"PeriodicalId\":286315,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Developing Areas\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Developing Areas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/jda.2022.0064\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Developing Areas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jda.2022.0064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要:近年来,孟加拉国针对贫困和弱势群体的公共社会保障项目在数量和规模上都有所增长。这些计划的主要目标是使人们摆脱贫困,并为国家经济发展作出贡献。本文的目的是量化孟加拉国公共社会保障支出与贫困、收入不平等和GDP增长之间的关系。该研究使用1991年至2019年的多变量时间序列数据,并应用约翰森协整检验和向量误差校正(VEC)建模方法。本文采用三个因变量——贫困率、基尼系数和GDP增长率,而公共社会保障费用、人均GDP、1564岁的劳动年龄活跃人口、65岁以上的老年人口、资本形成总额、25-64岁接受高等教育(大专)的人口比例、通货膨胀率和出口收入占GDP的比例作为解释变量。估计结果表明,在孟加拉国,公共社会保障支出对总资本形成有重大影响,但对贫困或收入不平等在短期内没有影响。此外,从长期来看,资本形成、公共社会保障支出、老年人口和出口收入对GDP增长有显著的正向影响。较高的GDP水平应该会为政府金库带来更多的资源,使政府能够通过瞄准更多的受益人和提供更多的福利来扩大社会保障计划,这反过来又可以促进GDP的进一步增长。本研究还发现,无论从短期还是长期来看,公共社会保障支出对孟加拉国的收入不平等都没有显著影响。然而,一般的假设是,向低收入群体转移社会保障可能有助于减少收入不平等。在许多发展中国家,政府对目标社区的资金分配不足,导致不平等的变化微乎其微。孟加拉国的政策制定者从中得到的教训是,彻底改革现有的社会保障计划,这些计划显然对减少收入不平等的影响微乎其微,从长远来看,甚至可能加剧贫困。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Relationship Between Public Social Security Expenditures and Poverty, Income Inequality, and Gdp Growth: An Empirical Case Study of Bangladesh
ABSTRACT:During recent years, public social security programs for the poor and vulnerable groups in Bangladesh have grown both in number and size. The primary goal of these programs is to lift people out of poverty and to contribute to national economic development. The objective of this article is to quantify the relationship between public social security expenditures and poverty, income inequality, and GDP growth in Bangladesh. The study uses multivariate time series data from 1991 to 2019 and applies the Johansen cointegration test and the Vector Error Correction (VEC) modeling methodology. There are three dependent variables-poverty rate, Gini coefficient, and GDP growth rate, while public social security expenses, GDP per capita, active working-age population aged 1564, elderly population aged above 65, gross capital formation, share of population aged 25-64 with tertiary (post-secondary) education, inflation, and export earnings as a share of GDP are used as the explanatory variables. The estimated results suggest that public social security expenditures have significant effects on gross capital formation, but not on either poverty or income inequality in the short run in Bangladesh. In addition, capital formation, public social security expenditures, elderly population, and export earnings are found to have significant positive effects on GDP growth in the long run. Higher levels of GDP should generate more resources for the government coffers, enabling the government to expand the social security programs by targeting higher numbers of beneficiaries and offering higher amounts of benefits, which in turn can contribute to further GDP growth. This study also finds that public social security expenditures have no significant effect on income inequality in Bangladesh in either short run or long run. However, the general hypothesis is that social security transfers to lower-income groups may help with reducing income inequality. In many developing countries, governments allocate and distribute inadequate amounts of money to targeted communities, which results in only marginal changes in inequality. The lesson for the policymakers in Bangladesh is to overhaul the existing social security programs that evidently have had marginal effects on reducing income inequality, and may even have worsened poverty in the long run.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信