诊断死亡

D. Gardiner, A. McGee
{"title":"诊断死亡","authors":"D. Gardiner, A. McGee","doi":"10.1093/med/9780198817161.003.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It was not always doctors who diagnosed death. Advances in resuscitation and fears of premature burial led to doctors having a duty to diagnose death in a safe and timely way. The birth of intensive care in the twentieth century demonstrated that it was possible for the heart to keep beating even after the brain had permanently ceased functioning. A worldwide, unifying, brain-based definition of death could be termed ‘permanent brain arrest’. The clinical characteristics of permanent brain arrest would be the permanent loss of capacity for consciousness and loss of all brainstem functions (including the capacity to breathe), which might arise from primary brain injury or secondary to circulatory arrest. Three sets of criteria are used by doctors to diagnose death, depending on the clinical circumstances: forensic, circulatory, and neurological. All three sets of criteria point to the same brain-based definition of death. While there is widespread consensus for these standards—in practice and in law—they are not without criticism.","PeriodicalId":167551,"journal":{"name":"Law and ethics in intensive care","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnosing Death\",\"authors\":\"D. Gardiner, A. McGee\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/med/9780198817161.003.0007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It was not always doctors who diagnosed death. Advances in resuscitation and fears of premature burial led to doctors having a duty to diagnose death in a safe and timely way. The birth of intensive care in the twentieth century demonstrated that it was possible for the heart to keep beating even after the brain had permanently ceased functioning. A worldwide, unifying, brain-based definition of death could be termed ‘permanent brain arrest’. The clinical characteristics of permanent brain arrest would be the permanent loss of capacity for consciousness and loss of all brainstem functions (including the capacity to breathe), which might arise from primary brain injury or secondary to circulatory arrest. Three sets of criteria are used by doctors to diagnose death, depending on the clinical circumstances: forensic, circulatory, and neurological. All three sets of criteria point to the same brain-based definition of death. While there is widespread consensus for these standards—in practice and in law—they are not without criticism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":167551,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Law and ethics in intensive care\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Law and ethics in intensive care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780198817161.003.0007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law and ethics in intensive care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780198817161.003.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

诊断死亡的并不总是医生。复苏技术的进步和对过早埋葬的恐惧使医生有责任以安全和及时的方式诊断死亡。20世纪重症监护的诞生表明,即使在大脑永久停止运作后,心脏仍有可能继续跳动。一个世界性的、统一的、基于大脑的死亡定义可以被称为“永久性脑骤停”。永久性脑骤停的临床特征是永久性丧失意识能力和所有脑干功能(包括呼吸能力)的丧失,这可能是由原发性脑损伤或继发于循环骤停引起的。医生根据临床情况使用三套标准来诊断死亡:法医、循环系统和神经系统。所有三套标准都指向相同的基于大脑的死亡定义。尽管在实践和法律上对这些标准有广泛的共识,但它们并非没有批评。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnosing Death
It was not always doctors who diagnosed death. Advances in resuscitation and fears of premature burial led to doctors having a duty to diagnose death in a safe and timely way. The birth of intensive care in the twentieth century demonstrated that it was possible for the heart to keep beating even after the brain had permanently ceased functioning. A worldwide, unifying, brain-based definition of death could be termed ‘permanent brain arrest’. The clinical characteristics of permanent brain arrest would be the permanent loss of capacity for consciousness and loss of all brainstem functions (including the capacity to breathe), which might arise from primary brain injury or secondary to circulatory arrest. Three sets of criteria are used by doctors to diagnose death, depending on the clinical circumstances: forensic, circulatory, and neurological. All three sets of criteria point to the same brain-based definition of death. While there is widespread consensus for these standards—in practice and in law—they are not without criticism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信