农业大棚与住宅建筑体现能源与运行能源的比较

John Vourdoubas
{"title":"农业大棚与住宅建筑体现能源与运行能源的比较","authors":"John Vourdoubas","doi":"10.5296/emsd.v12i2.21159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The increase of the energy efficiency in buildings and greenhouses is important for reducing the use of fossil fuels and the emissions of greenhouse gases. Energy efficiency evaluation requires the consideration of both the embodied and the operational energy. Many estimations regarding the embodied and the operational energy in various types of buildings have been reported so far. However, studies regarding the embodied energy in agricultural greenhouses are rare while there are many estimations regarding their operational energy. The goal of our study is the comparison of the embodied and the operational energy in residential buildings and in agricultural greenhouses. The embodied and operational energies are compared in greenhouses as well as in low-energy and in conventional residential buildings.  Our results indicate that the ratio of embodied energy to life-cycle energy in low-energy residential buildings and in nearly-zero energy buildings varies in the range at 36% to 83% that is significantly higher than the ratio in conventional residential buildings which is in the range of 6% to 20%. The ratio of embodied energy to life-cycle energy in agricultural greenhouses, at 0.86% - 70.41%, varies significantly depending on many parameters. The importance of carbon emissions related to embodied energy in low-energy buildings, in net-zero energy buildings and in agricultural greenhouses is highlighted.  Our work could be useful to policy makers who are willing to accelerate the green transition to a low carbon economy in the coming decades.","PeriodicalId":408586,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Management and Sustainable Development","volume":"344 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the embodied and operating energy in agricultural greenhouses and in residential buildings\",\"authors\":\"John Vourdoubas\",\"doi\":\"10.5296/emsd.v12i2.21159\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The increase of the energy efficiency in buildings and greenhouses is important for reducing the use of fossil fuels and the emissions of greenhouse gases. Energy efficiency evaluation requires the consideration of both the embodied and the operational energy. Many estimations regarding the embodied and the operational energy in various types of buildings have been reported so far. However, studies regarding the embodied energy in agricultural greenhouses are rare while there are many estimations regarding their operational energy. The goal of our study is the comparison of the embodied and the operational energy in residential buildings and in agricultural greenhouses. The embodied and operational energies are compared in greenhouses as well as in low-energy and in conventional residential buildings.  Our results indicate that the ratio of embodied energy to life-cycle energy in low-energy residential buildings and in nearly-zero energy buildings varies in the range at 36% to 83% that is significantly higher than the ratio in conventional residential buildings which is in the range of 6% to 20%. The ratio of embodied energy to life-cycle energy in agricultural greenhouses, at 0.86% - 70.41%, varies significantly depending on many parameters. The importance of carbon emissions related to embodied energy in low-energy buildings, in net-zero energy buildings and in agricultural greenhouses is highlighted.  Our work could be useful to policy makers who are willing to accelerate the green transition to a low carbon economy in the coming decades.\",\"PeriodicalId\":408586,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Management and Sustainable Development\",\"volume\":\"344 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Management and Sustainable Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5296/emsd.v12i2.21159\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Management and Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5296/emsd.v12i2.21159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

提高建筑物和温室的能源效率对于减少化石燃料的使用和温室气体的排放非常重要。能效评价既要考虑体现能量,也要考虑运行能量。到目前为止,已经报道了许多关于各种类型建筑物的具体能源和运行能源的估计。然而,对农业温室的隐含能量的研究较少,而对其运行能量的估计较多。本研究的目的是比较住宅建筑和农业大棚的体现能源和运行能源。对温室、低能耗住宅和传统住宅的具体能耗和运行能耗进行了比较。我们的研究结果表明,低能耗住宅建筑和接近零能耗建筑的隐含能量与生命周期能量之比在36% ~ 83%之间变化,显著高于传统住宅建筑的6% ~ 20%。农业温室的蕴含能量占生命周期能量的比例在0.86% - 70.41%之间,这一比例因许多参数的不同而有显著差异。强调了低能耗建筑、净零能耗建筑和农业温室中与隐含能源相关的碳排放的重要性。对于那些愿意在未来几十年加速向低碳经济绿色转型的政策制定者来说,我们的工作可能是有用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of the embodied and operating energy in agricultural greenhouses and in residential buildings
The increase of the energy efficiency in buildings and greenhouses is important for reducing the use of fossil fuels and the emissions of greenhouse gases. Energy efficiency evaluation requires the consideration of both the embodied and the operational energy. Many estimations regarding the embodied and the operational energy in various types of buildings have been reported so far. However, studies regarding the embodied energy in agricultural greenhouses are rare while there are many estimations regarding their operational energy. The goal of our study is the comparison of the embodied and the operational energy in residential buildings and in agricultural greenhouses. The embodied and operational energies are compared in greenhouses as well as in low-energy and in conventional residential buildings.  Our results indicate that the ratio of embodied energy to life-cycle energy in low-energy residential buildings and in nearly-zero energy buildings varies in the range at 36% to 83% that is significantly higher than the ratio in conventional residential buildings which is in the range of 6% to 20%. The ratio of embodied energy to life-cycle energy in agricultural greenhouses, at 0.86% - 70.41%, varies significantly depending on many parameters. The importance of carbon emissions related to embodied energy in low-energy buildings, in net-zero energy buildings and in agricultural greenhouses is highlighted.  Our work could be useful to policy makers who are willing to accelerate the green transition to a low carbon economy in the coming decades.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信