测绘跨国:根源旅游与民族遗产制度化

K. Clarke
{"title":"测绘跨国:根源旅游与民族遗产制度化","authors":"K. Clarke","doi":"10.1215/9780822387596-007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the most important issues in the anthropology of Africa of the late twentieth century has been the “invention of Africa.”1 V. Y. Mudimbe (1988) has demonstrated that, in addition to the existence of particular forms of native logics, colonial constructions of history, classifications of ethnicity, boundaries, and the imposition of European languages have informed the discourses through which Africans understand each other and themselves. This “invention” of Africanness has been revived by some black Americans in the United States, who, looking to Africa for ancestral roots, have reinvented themselves as both Africans (through descent) and U.S. Americans (through lived experience). It should be no surprise, therefore, that two of the most powerful ideological narratives of U.S. black nationalist imaginaries that took shape in the mid-1960s and continue to circulate in the present are the “slavery narrative” and the “African nobility-redemption” narrative.2 The slavery narrative (Martin Shaw and Clarke 1995) is based on notions of ancestral and therefore biological commonalities among black people. It narrates how Africans were torn from Africa, how they were enslaved because of racial oppression and brought to the New World. It also highlights how, despite the oppressive conditions under which they lived, enslaved Africans produced “diverse cultures” and maintained a fundamental connection to their African past. Through the symbolics of blood3 and diasporic displacement and suffering, these narratives signify a connection to Africa that produces notions of ancestry as being constituted through and from one black ancestor to another. It describes black Americans as surviving incarnations of pre-slavery African societies, thereby enabling a selfidentification of black Americans as not simply racialized, but fundamentally embedded in genealogies of heritage. The African nobility narrative, on the other hand, legitimates the centrality of slavery as the basis for African American connections to Africa, while also eliding it as secondary to the pride of black heritage. By highlighting the idea that African Americans are not merely victims of slavery but descendants of an","PeriodicalId":177427,"journal":{"name":"Globalization and Race","volume":"118 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mapping Transnationality: Roots Tourism and the Institutionalization of Ethnic Heritage\",\"authors\":\"K. Clarke\",\"doi\":\"10.1215/9780822387596-007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One of the most important issues in the anthropology of Africa of the late twentieth century has been the “invention of Africa.”1 V. Y. Mudimbe (1988) has demonstrated that, in addition to the existence of particular forms of native logics, colonial constructions of history, classifications of ethnicity, boundaries, and the imposition of European languages have informed the discourses through which Africans understand each other and themselves. This “invention” of Africanness has been revived by some black Americans in the United States, who, looking to Africa for ancestral roots, have reinvented themselves as both Africans (through descent) and U.S. Americans (through lived experience). It should be no surprise, therefore, that two of the most powerful ideological narratives of U.S. black nationalist imaginaries that took shape in the mid-1960s and continue to circulate in the present are the “slavery narrative” and the “African nobility-redemption” narrative.2 The slavery narrative (Martin Shaw and Clarke 1995) is based on notions of ancestral and therefore biological commonalities among black people. It narrates how Africans were torn from Africa, how they were enslaved because of racial oppression and brought to the New World. It also highlights how, despite the oppressive conditions under which they lived, enslaved Africans produced “diverse cultures” and maintained a fundamental connection to their African past. Through the symbolics of blood3 and diasporic displacement and suffering, these narratives signify a connection to Africa that produces notions of ancestry as being constituted through and from one black ancestor to another. It describes black Americans as surviving incarnations of pre-slavery African societies, thereby enabling a selfidentification of black Americans as not simply racialized, but fundamentally embedded in genealogies of heritage. The African nobility narrative, on the other hand, legitimates the centrality of slavery as the basis for African American connections to Africa, while also eliding it as secondary to the pride of black heritage. By highlighting the idea that African Americans are not merely victims of slavery but descendants of an\",\"PeriodicalId\":177427,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Globalization and Race\",\"volume\":\"118 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Globalization and Race\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822387596-007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Globalization and Race","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822387596-007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

20世纪后期非洲人类学最重要的问题之一是“非洲的发明”。“1 V。Y. Mudimbe(1988)已经证明,除了特定形式的本土逻辑的存在之外,历史的殖民建构、种族分类、边界和欧洲语言的强加都为非洲人相互理解和自我理解的话语提供了信息。这种对非洲性的“发明”被美国的一些黑人复兴了,他们在非洲寻找祖先的根,把自己重新塑造成非洲人(通过血统)和美国人(通过生活经历)。因此,毫不奇怪,在20世纪60年代中期形成并继续流传至今的美国黑人民族主义想象中最强大的两种意识形态叙事是“奴隶制叙事”和“非洲贵族-救赎”叙事奴隶制叙事(马丁·肖和克拉克1995)是基于祖先的概念,因此黑人的生物共性。它讲述了非洲人是如何被从非洲撕裂的,他们是如何因为种族压迫而被奴役并被带到新大陆的。它还强调,尽管被奴役的非洲人生活在压迫的条件下,他们如何创造了“多样化的文化”,并与他们的非洲过去保持着根本的联系。通过鲜血、流散的流离失所和苦难的象征,这些叙述表明了一种与非洲的联系,这种联系产生了通过一个黑人祖先到另一个黑人祖先而形成的祖先观念。它将美国黑人描述为奴隶制前非洲社会的幸存化身,从而使美国黑人的自我认同不仅仅是种族化,而是从根本上根植于遗产的谱系中。另一方面,非洲贵族的叙述,将奴隶制作为非裔美国人与非洲联系的基础的中心地位合法化,同时也将其排除在黑人遗产的骄傲之外。通过强调非裔美国人不仅是奴隶制的受害者,也是黑人的后代
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mapping Transnationality: Roots Tourism and the Institutionalization of Ethnic Heritage
One of the most important issues in the anthropology of Africa of the late twentieth century has been the “invention of Africa.”1 V. Y. Mudimbe (1988) has demonstrated that, in addition to the existence of particular forms of native logics, colonial constructions of history, classifications of ethnicity, boundaries, and the imposition of European languages have informed the discourses through which Africans understand each other and themselves. This “invention” of Africanness has been revived by some black Americans in the United States, who, looking to Africa for ancestral roots, have reinvented themselves as both Africans (through descent) and U.S. Americans (through lived experience). It should be no surprise, therefore, that two of the most powerful ideological narratives of U.S. black nationalist imaginaries that took shape in the mid-1960s and continue to circulate in the present are the “slavery narrative” and the “African nobility-redemption” narrative.2 The slavery narrative (Martin Shaw and Clarke 1995) is based on notions of ancestral and therefore biological commonalities among black people. It narrates how Africans were torn from Africa, how they were enslaved because of racial oppression and brought to the New World. It also highlights how, despite the oppressive conditions under which they lived, enslaved Africans produced “diverse cultures” and maintained a fundamental connection to their African past. Through the symbolics of blood3 and diasporic displacement and suffering, these narratives signify a connection to Africa that produces notions of ancestry as being constituted through and from one black ancestor to another. It describes black Americans as surviving incarnations of pre-slavery African societies, thereby enabling a selfidentification of black Americans as not simply racialized, but fundamentally embedded in genealogies of heritage. The African nobility narrative, on the other hand, legitimates the centrality of slavery as the basis for African American connections to Africa, while also eliding it as secondary to the pride of black heritage. By highlighting the idea that African Americans are not merely victims of slavery but descendants of an
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信