基于CRC和KECCAK的资源受限设备消息认证比较

Yang Yu, S. Tao, E. Dubrova
{"title":"基于CRC和KECCAK的资源受限设备消息认证比较","authors":"Yang Yu, S. Tao, E. Dubrova","doi":"10.1109/NEWCAS.2018.8585692","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the growth of Internet-of-Things (IoT), billions of low-end devices become connected to provide new services appealing to users. The value of the information to which these devices have access via network is increasing, too, making them an attractive target for cyberattacks. Low-end IoT devices typically have very limited computing, storage and energy resources. Therefore, it is not always possible to use conventional cryptographic algorithms for their protection. In this paper, we investigate whether a cryptographically secure Cyclic Redundancy Check (CRC)-based Message Authentication Code (CMAC) and a KECCAK-based Message Authentication Code (KMAC) satisfy limitations of resource-constrained IoT devices. We implement the 128-bits CMAC and the 128-bits KMAC in 65nm CMOS and compare their performance. To our best knowledge, no hardware implementations of CMAC and KMAC have been presented so far. Our evaluation shows that, for 1.2V operating voltage and clock frequencies above 1 MHz, the CMAC128 is at least 32 times more area-efficient and at least 21 times more power-efficient than the KMAC128.","PeriodicalId":112526,"journal":{"name":"2018 16th IEEE International New Circuits and Systems Conference (NEWCAS)","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of CRC and KECCAK Based Message Authentication for Resource-Constrained Devices\",\"authors\":\"Yang Yu, S. Tao, E. Dubrova\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/NEWCAS.2018.8585692\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the growth of Internet-of-Things (IoT), billions of low-end devices become connected to provide new services appealing to users. The value of the information to which these devices have access via network is increasing, too, making them an attractive target for cyberattacks. Low-end IoT devices typically have very limited computing, storage and energy resources. Therefore, it is not always possible to use conventional cryptographic algorithms for their protection. In this paper, we investigate whether a cryptographically secure Cyclic Redundancy Check (CRC)-based Message Authentication Code (CMAC) and a KECCAK-based Message Authentication Code (KMAC) satisfy limitations of resource-constrained IoT devices. We implement the 128-bits CMAC and the 128-bits KMAC in 65nm CMOS and compare their performance. To our best knowledge, no hardware implementations of CMAC and KMAC have been presented so far. Our evaluation shows that, for 1.2V operating voltage and clock frequencies above 1 MHz, the CMAC128 is at least 32 times more area-efficient and at least 21 times more power-efficient than the KMAC128.\",\"PeriodicalId\":112526,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 16th IEEE International New Circuits and Systems Conference (NEWCAS)\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 16th IEEE International New Circuits and Systems Conference (NEWCAS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/NEWCAS.2018.8585692\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 16th IEEE International New Circuits and Systems Conference (NEWCAS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NEWCAS.2018.8585692","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着物联网(IoT)的发展,数十亿低端设备连接起来,提供吸引用户的新服务。这些设备通过网络访问的信息价值也在增加,这使它们成为网络攻击的诱人目标。低端物联网设备通常具有非常有限的计算、存储和能源资源。因此,并不总是可以使用传统的加密算法来保护它们。在本文中,我们研究了加密安全的基于循环冗余校验(CRC)的消息验证码(CMAC)和基于keccak的消息验证码(KMAC)是否满足资源受限的物联网设备的限制。我们在65nm CMOS上实现了128位CMAC和128位KMAC,并比较了它们的性能。据我们所知,到目前为止还没有CMAC和KMAC的硬件实现。我们的评估表明,对于1.2V工作电压和高于1 MHz的时钟频率,CMAC128的面积效率至少是KMAC128的32倍,功耗效率至少是KMAC128的21倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of CRC and KECCAK Based Message Authentication for Resource-Constrained Devices
With the growth of Internet-of-Things (IoT), billions of low-end devices become connected to provide new services appealing to users. The value of the information to which these devices have access via network is increasing, too, making them an attractive target for cyberattacks. Low-end IoT devices typically have very limited computing, storage and energy resources. Therefore, it is not always possible to use conventional cryptographic algorithms for their protection. In this paper, we investigate whether a cryptographically secure Cyclic Redundancy Check (CRC)-based Message Authentication Code (CMAC) and a KECCAK-based Message Authentication Code (KMAC) satisfy limitations of resource-constrained IoT devices. We implement the 128-bits CMAC and the 128-bits KMAC in 65nm CMOS and compare their performance. To our best knowledge, no hardware implementations of CMAC and KMAC have been presented so far. Our evaluation shows that, for 1.2V operating voltage and clock frequencies above 1 MHz, the CMAC128 is at least 32 times more area-efficient and at least 21 times more power-efficient than the KMAC128.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信