轮到你还是轮到我?条件自动化的人机界面设计

Yannick Forster, Frederik Naujoks, A. Neukum
{"title":"轮到你还是轮到我?条件自动化的人机界面设计","authors":"Yannick Forster, Frederik Naujoks, A. Neukum","doi":"10.1145/3003715.3005463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cooperative Conditionally Automated Driving (CAD) systems pose new challenges to the development of human-machine interfaces (HMI). The system's current status and intentions must be communicated unambiguously to ensure safe driver-system interaction and acceptance. This topic is becoming increasingly important as advanced automated driving functions are expected to carry out tactical and strategical driving maneuvers. Within the current study, an HMI for CAD was designed and evaluated by a sample of human factors experts (N=6). The participants passed seven interaction scenarios in which they either had to take over control or let the system execute a maneuver. Driving task responsibility was explicitly communicated by the HMI (e.g., by coloring and semantic text information). Quantitative and qualitative system usability was examined during and after the drive. Results pointed towards a very good overall usability and acceptance. Except for one case, interactions went according to the system's intention. Suggested design improvements were implemented.","PeriodicalId":448266,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"40","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Your Turn or My Turn?: Design of a Human-Machine Interface for Conditional Automation\",\"authors\":\"Yannick Forster, Frederik Naujoks, A. Neukum\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3003715.3005463\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cooperative Conditionally Automated Driving (CAD) systems pose new challenges to the development of human-machine interfaces (HMI). The system's current status and intentions must be communicated unambiguously to ensure safe driver-system interaction and acceptance. This topic is becoming increasingly important as advanced automated driving functions are expected to carry out tactical and strategical driving maneuvers. Within the current study, an HMI for CAD was designed and evaluated by a sample of human factors experts (N=6). The participants passed seven interaction scenarios in which they either had to take over control or let the system execute a maneuver. Driving task responsibility was explicitly communicated by the HMI (e.g., by coloring and semantic text information). Quantitative and qualitative system usability was examined during and after the drive. Results pointed towards a very good overall usability and acceptance. Except for one case, interactions went according to the system's intention. Suggested design improvements were implemented.\",\"PeriodicalId\":448266,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"40\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3003715.3005463\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3003715.3005463","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 40

摘要

协同条件自动驾驶(CAD)系统对人机界面(HMI)的发展提出了新的挑战。系统的当前状态和意图必须明确地传达,以确保驾驶员与系统的安全交互和接受。随着先进的自动驾驶功能有望执行战术和战略驾驶机动,这个话题变得越来越重要。在当前的研究中,人为因素专家(N=6)设计并评估了CAD的HMI。参与者通过了七个交互场景,在这些场景中,他们要么必须接管控制权,要么让系统执行操作。驱动任务责任通过HMI明确地传达(例如,通过着色和语义文本信息)。在驱动期间和之后对系统的可用性进行了定量和定性的检查。结果显示了非常好的总体可用性和可接受性。除了一种情况外,交互都是按照系统的意图进行的。建议的设计改进得到实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Your Turn or My Turn?: Design of a Human-Machine Interface for Conditional Automation
Cooperative Conditionally Automated Driving (CAD) systems pose new challenges to the development of human-machine interfaces (HMI). The system's current status and intentions must be communicated unambiguously to ensure safe driver-system interaction and acceptance. This topic is becoming increasingly important as advanced automated driving functions are expected to carry out tactical and strategical driving maneuvers. Within the current study, an HMI for CAD was designed and evaluated by a sample of human factors experts (N=6). The participants passed seven interaction scenarios in which they either had to take over control or let the system execute a maneuver. Driving task responsibility was explicitly communicated by the HMI (e.g., by coloring and semantic text information). Quantitative and qualitative system usability was examined during and after the drive. Results pointed towards a very good overall usability and acceptance. Except for one case, interactions went according to the system's intention. Suggested design improvements were implemented.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信