《法律、环境和全球南方研究手册》导言

Philippe Cullet, Sujith Koonan
{"title":"《法律、环境和全球南方研究手册》导言","authors":"Philippe Cullet, Sujith Koonan","doi":"10.4337/9781784717469.00005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Environmental law has grown over the past five decades around conservation measures, often linked to development concerns.1 At the international level, the Stockholm Declaration – often seen as the foundational instrument of international environmental law – had already linked environmental protection with economic development.2 This link was progressively strengthened up to the point where, in 1987, the notion of sustainable development officially sanctified the bond.3 Since then, there has been no turning back and sustainable development progressively became the anchor around which environmental measures have been structured.4 However, what was supposed to be a more or less equal relationship between environmental protection, social development and economic development became unhinged in 2012 with the introduction of the concept of green economy, which reflects policymakers’ desire to give more importance to economic growth.5 Indeed, one of the major trends over the past couple of decades has been the progressive economisation of environmental regulation.6 The linking of environment and development tends to make us forget that (economic) development has been and remains part of the problem that needs to be addressed. Policymakers have had for decades the benefit of reports like Limits to Growth highlighting the grave dangers associated with the existing development model.7 Yet, environmental law has been conceived mostly within a conceptual framework that makes conservation often subsidiary to economic development concerns. In other words, environmental conservation is largely centred around measures that will not hamper economic growth. This sidelines the fact that growth itself may be inimical to social development and the realisation of human rights.","PeriodicalId":246322,"journal":{"name":"Research Handbook on Law, Environment and the Global South","volume":"128 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introduction to the Research Handbook on Law, Environment and the Global South\",\"authors\":\"Philippe Cullet, Sujith Koonan\",\"doi\":\"10.4337/9781784717469.00005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Environmental law has grown over the past five decades around conservation measures, often linked to development concerns.1 At the international level, the Stockholm Declaration – often seen as the foundational instrument of international environmental law – had already linked environmental protection with economic development.2 This link was progressively strengthened up to the point where, in 1987, the notion of sustainable development officially sanctified the bond.3 Since then, there has been no turning back and sustainable development progressively became the anchor around which environmental measures have been structured.4 However, what was supposed to be a more or less equal relationship between environmental protection, social development and economic development became unhinged in 2012 with the introduction of the concept of green economy, which reflects policymakers’ desire to give more importance to economic growth.5 Indeed, one of the major trends over the past couple of decades has been the progressive economisation of environmental regulation.6 The linking of environment and development tends to make us forget that (economic) development has been and remains part of the problem that needs to be addressed. Policymakers have had for decades the benefit of reports like Limits to Growth highlighting the grave dangers associated with the existing development model.7 Yet, environmental law has been conceived mostly within a conceptual framework that makes conservation often subsidiary to economic development concerns. In other words, environmental conservation is largely centred around measures that will not hamper economic growth. This sidelines the fact that growth itself may be inimical to social development and the realisation of human rights.\",\"PeriodicalId\":246322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research Handbook on Law, Environment and the Global South\",\"volume\":\"128 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research Handbook on Law, Environment and the Global South\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784717469.00005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Handbook on Law, Environment and the Global South","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784717469.00005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在过去的50年里,环境法围绕保护措施不断发展,这些措施往往与发展问题有关在国际一级,《斯德哥尔摩宣言》- -通常被视为国际环境法的基本文书- -已经将环境保护与经济发展联系起来这种联系逐渐得到加强,直到1987年,可持续发展的概念正式使这种联系神圣化从那时起,就没有回头路,可持续发展逐渐成为环境措施的基础然而,在2012年,随着绿色经济概念的引入,环境保护、社会发展和经济发展之间应该或多或少平等的关系变得混乱,这反映了政策制定者更加重视经济增长的愿望的确,过去二十年的主要趋势之一是环境管理的逐步节约环境与发展的联系往往使我们忘记(经济)发展一直是而且仍然是需要解决的问题的一部分。政策制定者几十年来一直受益于《增长的极限》等报告,这些报告强调了与现有发展模式相关的严重危险然而,环境法主要是在一种概念框架内构思的,这种概念框架使保护往往附属于经济发展问题。换句话说,环境保护主要集中在不会阻碍经济增长的措施上。这忽略了增长本身可能不利于社会发展和实现人权的事实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Introduction to the Research Handbook on Law, Environment and the Global South
Environmental law has grown over the past five decades around conservation measures, often linked to development concerns.1 At the international level, the Stockholm Declaration – often seen as the foundational instrument of international environmental law – had already linked environmental protection with economic development.2 This link was progressively strengthened up to the point where, in 1987, the notion of sustainable development officially sanctified the bond.3 Since then, there has been no turning back and sustainable development progressively became the anchor around which environmental measures have been structured.4 However, what was supposed to be a more or less equal relationship between environmental protection, social development and economic development became unhinged in 2012 with the introduction of the concept of green economy, which reflects policymakers’ desire to give more importance to economic growth.5 Indeed, one of the major trends over the past couple of decades has been the progressive economisation of environmental regulation.6 The linking of environment and development tends to make us forget that (economic) development has been and remains part of the problem that needs to be addressed. Policymakers have had for decades the benefit of reports like Limits to Growth highlighting the grave dangers associated with the existing development model.7 Yet, environmental law has been conceived mostly within a conceptual framework that makes conservation often subsidiary to economic development concerns. In other words, environmental conservation is largely centred around measures that will not hamper economic growth. This sidelines the fact that growth itself may be inimical to social development and the realisation of human rights.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信