工程课程内容创作工具的教学分析

Anita S. Diwakar, M. Patwardhan, S. Murthy
{"title":"工程课程内容创作工具的教学分析","authors":"Anita S. Diwakar, M. Patwardhan, S. Murthy","doi":"10.1109/T4E.2012.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Developing customized and interactive learning material for engineering curriculum by teachers, in order to meet individual requirements of students can enhance the teaching-learning process. A number of available content authoring tools have been classified according to various dimensions. However, selecting the appropriate authoring tool is a difficult task for instructors, in the absence of selection criteria aligned with instructional goals. Considering the goal of creating educational content, the classification criteria for authoring tools need to emphasize on the teaching-learning perspective. In this paper, we analyse content authoring tools on the basis of their pedagogical features. We propose selection criteria based on the principles derived from learning theories and best teaching-learning practices which contain dimensions of pedagogy, technology and usability. We apply the criteria to some of the existing content authoring tools and identify three tools which satisfy the criteria. We then present data on teachers' perspective about the effectiveness of these tools for their teaching practice.","PeriodicalId":202337,"journal":{"name":"2012 IEEE Fourth International Conference on Technology for Education","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pedagogical Analysis of Content Authoring Tools for Engineering Curriculum\",\"authors\":\"Anita S. Diwakar, M. Patwardhan, S. Murthy\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/T4E.2012.15\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Developing customized and interactive learning material for engineering curriculum by teachers, in order to meet individual requirements of students can enhance the teaching-learning process. A number of available content authoring tools have been classified according to various dimensions. However, selecting the appropriate authoring tool is a difficult task for instructors, in the absence of selection criteria aligned with instructional goals. Considering the goal of creating educational content, the classification criteria for authoring tools need to emphasize on the teaching-learning perspective. In this paper, we analyse content authoring tools on the basis of their pedagogical features. We propose selection criteria based on the principles derived from learning theories and best teaching-learning practices which contain dimensions of pedagogy, technology and usability. We apply the criteria to some of the existing content authoring tools and identify three tools which satisfy the criteria. We then present data on teachers' perspective about the effectiveness of these tools for their teaching practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":202337,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2012 IEEE Fourth International Conference on Technology for Education\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2012 IEEE Fourth International Conference on Technology for Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/T4E.2012.15\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 IEEE Fourth International Conference on Technology for Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/T4E.2012.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

教师为工程课程开发个性化、互动性的学习材料,满足学生的个性化需求,可以促进教学过程。根据不同的维度对许多可用的内容创作工具进行了分类。然而,在缺乏与教学目标一致的选择标准的情况下,选择合适的创作工具对教师来说是一项艰巨的任务。考虑到创建教育内容的目标,创作工具的分类标准需要强调教与学的视角。本文根据内容创作工具的教学特点,对其进行了分析。我们提出了基于学习理论和最佳教学实践的原则的选择标准,这些原则包含了教学法、技术和可用性的维度。我们将这些标准应用于一些现有的内容创作工具,并确定三个满足这些标准的工具。然后,我们提出了教师对这些工具在教学实践中的有效性的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pedagogical Analysis of Content Authoring Tools for Engineering Curriculum
Developing customized and interactive learning material for engineering curriculum by teachers, in order to meet individual requirements of students can enhance the teaching-learning process. A number of available content authoring tools have been classified according to various dimensions. However, selecting the appropriate authoring tool is a difficult task for instructors, in the absence of selection criteria aligned with instructional goals. Considering the goal of creating educational content, the classification criteria for authoring tools need to emphasize on the teaching-learning perspective. In this paper, we analyse content authoring tools on the basis of their pedagogical features. We propose selection criteria based on the principles derived from learning theories and best teaching-learning practices which contain dimensions of pedagogy, technology and usability. We apply the criteria to some of the existing content authoring tools and identify three tools which satisfy the criteria. We then present data on teachers' perspective about the effectiveness of these tools for their teaching practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信