轴压下加筋柱极限强度的数值与试验研究

H. Mei, De-yu Wang, Qi Wan
{"title":"轴压下加筋柱极限强度的数值与试验研究","authors":"H. Mei, De-yu Wang, Qi Wan","doi":"10.1115/omae2020-18340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Six specimens with one Tee-bar stiffener and its attached plating were tested under axial compression to investigate the ultimate strength. The specimens have one longitudinal span and the simply supported boundary conditions at the end edge of loading were produced based on a horizontal test fixture. The initial geometrical imperfections were measured and tensile tests of high tensile steel used in the specimens with different thickness were conducted. The results calculated by FE analysis with true stress-strain curves, average measured thickness and measured initial geometrical deformation could reach a good agreement with experimental results. The ultimate strength calculated with elastic/perfectly plastic curve is approximately 10% larger than that with true stress-strain curve. The reason is that the proportional limit stress of material is significantly lower than 0.2% proof stress for the high strength steel used in specimens. And the occurrence of buckling is earlier than the time that the material enters into plastic stage. As a result, the ultimate strength assessed with elastic/perfectly plastic curve doesn’t always the lowest result and it should be adopted carefully.","PeriodicalId":191387,"journal":{"name":"Volume 2B: Structures, Safety, and Reliability","volume":"320 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Numerical and Experimental Study on Ultimate Strength of Stiffened Column Under Axial Compression\",\"authors\":\"H. Mei, De-yu Wang, Qi Wan\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/omae2020-18340\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Six specimens with one Tee-bar stiffener and its attached plating were tested under axial compression to investigate the ultimate strength. The specimens have one longitudinal span and the simply supported boundary conditions at the end edge of loading were produced based on a horizontal test fixture. The initial geometrical imperfections were measured and tensile tests of high tensile steel used in the specimens with different thickness were conducted. The results calculated by FE analysis with true stress-strain curves, average measured thickness and measured initial geometrical deformation could reach a good agreement with experimental results. The ultimate strength calculated with elastic/perfectly plastic curve is approximately 10% larger than that with true stress-strain curve. The reason is that the proportional limit stress of material is significantly lower than 0.2% proof stress for the high strength steel used in specimens. And the occurrence of buckling is earlier than the time that the material enters into plastic stage. As a result, the ultimate strength assessed with elastic/perfectly plastic curve doesn’t always the lowest result and it should be adopted carefully.\",\"PeriodicalId\":191387,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Volume 2B: Structures, Safety, and Reliability\",\"volume\":\"320 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Volume 2B: Structures, Safety, and Reliability\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/omae2020-18340\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 2B: Structures, Safety, and Reliability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/omae2020-18340","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在轴压作用下,对6个带有1根加劲筋及其附板的试件进行了极限强度试验。试件具有一个纵向跨度,在水平试验夹具的基础上产生了加载端缘的简支边界条件。测量了初始几何缺陷,并对不同厚度的高强钢试样进行了拉伸试验。用真实应力-应变曲线、实测平均厚度和实测初始几何变形进行有限元分析,计算结果与实验结果吻合较好。用弹/完全塑性曲线计算的极限强度比用真应力-应变曲线计算的极限强度大10%左右。原因是材料的比例极限应力明显低于试样中所用高强度钢的0.2% proof应力。屈曲的发生要早于材料进入塑性阶段的时间。因此,用弹/完全塑性曲线计算的极限强度并不总是最低的结果,应慎重采用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Numerical and Experimental Study on Ultimate Strength of Stiffened Column Under Axial Compression
Six specimens with one Tee-bar stiffener and its attached plating were tested under axial compression to investigate the ultimate strength. The specimens have one longitudinal span and the simply supported boundary conditions at the end edge of loading were produced based on a horizontal test fixture. The initial geometrical imperfections were measured and tensile tests of high tensile steel used in the specimens with different thickness were conducted. The results calculated by FE analysis with true stress-strain curves, average measured thickness and measured initial geometrical deformation could reach a good agreement with experimental results. The ultimate strength calculated with elastic/perfectly plastic curve is approximately 10% larger than that with true stress-strain curve. The reason is that the proportional limit stress of material is significantly lower than 0.2% proof stress for the high strength steel used in specimens. And the occurrence of buckling is earlier than the time that the material enters into plastic stage. As a result, the ultimate strength assessed with elastic/perfectly plastic curve doesn’t always the lowest result and it should be adopted carefully.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信