H. Al-Jahdali, Mohammad A Khan, A. Al-Harbi, R. Rajkumar, M. Al-Gamedi
{"title":"2019冠状病毒病疫情期间某大型三级医院重症哮喘患者对虚拟诊所的体验及满意度","authors":"H. Al-Jahdali, Mohammad A Khan, A. Al-Harbi, R. Rajkumar, M. Al-Gamedi","doi":"10.1164/AJRCCM-CONFERENCE.2021.203.1_MEETINGABSTRACTS.A1271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Enforced social distancing (i.e. lockdowns) greatly facilitated control of COVID-19. Whilst access to hospitals was restricted, outpatient care continued remotely. At our institute, the biologic therapy for severe asthma patients is administered on-site by specialist nurses who follow manufacturers' recommendations. Aim: The aim of this study was to determine the satisfaction of patients with severe asthma with telemedicine, and the impact of COVID-19 lockdown on their receipt of biologics and other treatments for asthma. Methods: A crosssectional survey of 58 patients with severe asthma scheduled to receive biologic therapy at our hospital during the lockdown was performed with ethical approval. Results: Fifty-four patients participated (F 37;mean age 46.7 years;response rate 93.1%). Meantime since diagnosis was 19.2 years (SD 11.5 years). All had been on biologic therapy Omalizumab (45), Mepolizumab (7), or Dupilumab (2) for over three months (mean 38.4 months ± SD 26.5 months). Fifty (92.6%) had telephone follow-up, 31 (57.4%) were satisfied with telemedicine, 45 (81.4%) agreed that biologic therapy improved their asthma, and 40 (74.1%) received scheduled biologic therapy. Of the 45 patients living in the city, nine did not receive biologic therapy, two cited the lockdown as the reason for this;two did not receive an appointment;two did not perceive any benefit;2 had other reasons. Five of the nine patients living outside the city did not receive biologic therapy, 3 because of the lockdown, and 1 for fear of acquiring COVID-19. Alarmingly, 16 (29.6%) suggested that they had insufficient medications, and 27 (50%) reported difficulty obtaining medications. Conclusions: Many patients were satisfied with telemedicine, so this could be used to deliver routine outpatient tertiary care post-pandemic. However, logistics around supplying medications, and biologics must be considered in plans preparing for the second wave of COVID-19.","PeriodicalId":320542,"journal":{"name":"TP3. TP003 COVID-19 INFECTIONS, MECHANISMS, AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Severe Asthma Patients Experience and Satisfaction with Virtual Clinics in a Large Tertiary Care Hospital During COVID-19 Period\",\"authors\":\"H. Al-Jahdali, Mohammad A Khan, A. Al-Harbi, R. Rajkumar, M. Al-Gamedi\",\"doi\":\"10.1164/AJRCCM-CONFERENCE.2021.203.1_MEETINGABSTRACTS.A1271\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Enforced social distancing (i.e. lockdowns) greatly facilitated control of COVID-19. Whilst access to hospitals was restricted, outpatient care continued remotely. At our institute, the biologic therapy for severe asthma patients is administered on-site by specialist nurses who follow manufacturers' recommendations. Aim: The aim of this study was to determine the satisfaction of patients with severe asthma with telemedicine, and the impact of COVID-19 lockdown on their receipt of biologics and other treatments for asthma. Methods: A crosssectional survey of 58 patients with severe asthma scheduled to receive biologic therapy at our hospital during the lockdown was performed with ethical approval. Results: Fifty-four patients participated (F 37;mean age 46.7 years;response rate 93.1%). Meantime since diagnosis was 19.2 years (SD 11.5 years). All had been on biologic therapy Omalizumab (45), Mepolizumab (7), or Dupilumab (2) for over three months (mean 38.4 months ± SD 26.5 months). Fifty (92.6%) had telephone follow-up, 31 (57.4%) were satisfied with telemedicine, 45 (81.4%) agreed that biologic therapy improved their asthma, and 40 (74.1%) received scheduled biologic therapy. Of the 45 patients living in the city, nine did not receive biologic therapy, two cited the lockdown as the reason for this;two did not receive an appointment;two did not perceive any benefit;2 had other reasons. Five of the nine patients living outside the city did not receive biologic therapy, 3 because of the lockdown, and 1 for fear of acquiring COVID-19. Alarmingly, 16 (29.6%) suggested that they had insufficient medications, and 27 (50%) reported difficulty obtaining medications. Conclusions: Many patients were satisfied with telemedicine, so this could be used to deliver routine outpatient tertiary care post-pandemic. However, logistics around supplying medications, and biologics must be considered in plans preparing for the second wave of COVID-19.\",\"PeriodicalId\":320542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"TP3. TP003 COVID-19 INFECTIONS, MECHANISMS, AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"TP3. TP003 COVID-19 INFECTIONS, MECHANISMS, AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1164/AJRCCM-CONFERENCE.2021.203.1_MEETINGABSTRACTS.A1271\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TP3. TP003 COVID-19 INFECTIONS, MECHANISMS, AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1164/AJRCCM-CONFERENCE.2021.203.1_MEETINGABSTRACTS.A1271","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Severe Asthma Patients Experience and Satisfaction with Virtual Clinics in a Large Tertiary Care Hospital During COVID-19 Period
Background: Enforced social distancing (i.e. lockdowns) greatly facilitated control of COVID-19. Whilst access to hospitals was restricted, outpatient care continued remotely. At our institute, the biologic therapy for severe asthma patients is administered on-site by specialist nurses who follow manufacturers' recommendations. Aim: The aim of this study was to determine the satisfaction of patients with severe asthma with telemedicine, and the impact of COVID-19 lockdown on their receipt of biologics and other treatments for asthma. Methods: A crosssectional survey of 58 patients with severe asthma scheduled to receive biologic therapy at our hospital during the lockdown was performed with ethical approval. Results: Fifty-four patients participated (F 37;mean age 46.7 years;response rate 93.1%). Meantime since diagnosis was 19.2 years (SD 11.5 years). All had been on biologic therapy Omalizumab (45), Mepolizumab (7), or Dupilumab (2) for over three months (mean 38.4 months ± SD 26.5 months). Fifty (92.6%) had telephone follow-up, 31 (57.4%) were satisfied with telemedicine, 45 (81.4%) agreed that biologic therapy improved their asthma, and 40 (74.1%) received scheduled biologic therapy. Of the 45 patients living in the city, nine did not receive biologic therapy, two cited the lockdown as the reason for this;two did not receive an appointment;two did not perceive any benefit;2 had other reasons. Five of the nine patients living outside the city did not receive biologic therapy, 3 because of the lockdown, and 1 for fear of acquiring COVID-19. Alarmingly, 16 (29.6%) suggested that they had insufficient medications, and 27 (50%) reported difficulty obtaining medications. Conclusions: Many patients were satisfied with telemedicine, so this could be used to deliver routine outpatient tertiary care post-pandemic. However, logistics around supplying medications, and biologics must be considered in plans preparing for the second wave of COVID-19.