具有示意图差异的异构数据库的互操作性

R. Krishnamurthy, W. Litwin, W. Kent
{"title":"具有示意图差异的异构数据库的互操作性","authors":"R. Krishnamurthy, W. Litwin, W. Kent","doi":"10.1109/IMS.1991.153697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is widely accepted that relational language capabilities are insufficient to prove interoperability of databases even if they are all relational. In particular, view definitions cannot reconcile schematic discrepancy, in which one database's data (values) correspond to metadata of another database. Two new features are necessary: higher order expressions are needed where variables can range over data and metadata, and these expressions can be used to define a unified view over the original databases; higher order view definitions are necessary where the number of relations/attributes defined are dependent on the state of the database, in contrast to the traditional view definitions which specify a fixed set of relations for all states of the database.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":376969,"journal":{"name":"[1991] Proceedings. First International Workshop on Interoperability in Multidatabase Systems","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"37","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interoperability of heterogeneous databases with schematic discrepancies\",\"authors\":\"R. Krishnamurthy, W. Litwin, W. Kent\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IMS.1991.153697\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is widely accepted that relational language capabilities are insufficient to prove interoperability of databases even if they are all relational. In particular, view definitions cannot reconcile schematic discrepancy, in which one database's data (values) correspond to metadata of another database. Two new features are necessary: higher order expressions are needed where variables can range over data and metadata, and these expressions can be used to define a unified view over the original databases; higher order view definitions are necessary where the number of relations/attributes defined are dependent on the state of the database, in contrast to the traditional view definitions which specify a fixed set of relations for all states of the database.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":376969,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"[1991] Proceedings. First International Workshop on Interoperability in Multidatabase Systems\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1991-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"37\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"[1991] Proceedings. First International Workshop on Interoperability in Multidatabase Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IMS.1991.153697\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"[1991] Proceedings. First International Workshop on Interoperability in Multidatabase Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IMS.1991.153697","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 37

摘要

人们普遍认为,关系语言能力不足以证明数据库的互操作性,即使它们都是关系数据库。特别是,视图定义不能调和示意图的差异,其中一个数据库的数据(值)对应于另一个数据库的元数据。有两个新特性是必要的:需要高阶表达式,其中变量可以覆盖数据和元数据,并且这些表达式可以用于定义原始数据库的统一视图;高阶视图定义是必要的,其中定义的关系/属性的数量依赖于数据库的状态,而传统视图定义为数据库的所有状态指定一组固定的关系
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Interoperability of heterogeneous databases with schematic discrepancies
It is widely accepted that relational language capabilities are insufficient to prove interoperability of databases even if they are all relational. In particular, view definitions cannot reconcile schematic discrepancy, in which one database's data (values) correspond to metadata of another database. Two new features are necessary: higher order expressions are needed where variables can range over data and metadata, and these expressions can be used to define a unified view over the original databases; higher order view definitions are necessary where the number of relations/attributes defined are dependent on the state of the database, in contrast to the traditional view definitions which specify a fixed set of relations for all states of the database.<>
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信