在准完全设置中使用自然演绎处理不完整的系统规格

A. Bolotov, V. Shangin
{"title":"在准完全设置中使用自然演绎处理不完整的系统规格","authors":"A. Bolotov, V. Shangin","doi":"10.1109/COMPSAC.2014.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In many modern computer applications the significance of specification based verification is well accepted. However, when we deal with such complex processes as the integration of heterogeneous systems, parts of specification may be not known. Therefore it is important to have techniques that are able to cope with such incomplete information. An adequate formal setup is given by so called Para complete logics, where, contrary to the classical framework, for some statements we do not have evidence to conclude if they are true or false. As a consequence, for example, the law of excluded middle is not valid. In this paper we justify how the automated proof search technique for Para complete logic PComp can be efficiently applied to the reasoning about systems with incomplete information. Note that for many researchers, one of the core features of natural deduction, the opportunity to introduce arbitrary formulae as assumptions, has been a point of great scepticism regarding thievery possibility of the automation of the proof search. Here, not only we show the contrary, but we also turned the assumptions management into an advantage showing the applicability of the proposed technique to assume-guarantee reasoning.","PeriodicalId":106871,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE 38th Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tackling Incomplete System Specifications Using Natural Deduction in the Paracomplete Setting\",\"authors\":\"A. Bolotov, V. Shangin\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/COMPSAC.2014.15\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In many modern computer applications the significance of specification based verification is well accepted. However, when we deal with such complex processes as the integration of heterogeneous systems, parts of specification may be not known. Therefore it is important to have techniques that are able to cope with such incomplete information. An adequate formal setup is given by so called Para complete logics, where, contrary to the classical framework, for some statements we do not have evidence to conclude if they are true or false. As a consequence, for example, the law of excluded middle is not valid. In this paper we justify how the automated proof search technique for Para complete logic PComp can be efficiently applied to the reasoning about systems with incomplete information. Note that for many researchers, one of the core features of natural deduction, the opportunity to introduce arbitrary formulae as assumptions, has been a point of great scepticism regarding thievery possibility of the automation of the proof search. Here, not only we show the contrary, but we also turned the assumptions management into an advantage showing the applicability of the proposed technique to assume-guarantee reasoning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":106871,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 IEEE 38th Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 IEEE 38th Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/COMPSAC.2014.15\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE 38th Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/COMPSAC.2014.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在许多现代计算机应用中,基于规范的验证的重要性已被广泛接受。然而,当我们处理像异构系统集成这样复杂的过程时,部分规范可能是未知的。因此,拥有能够处理这种不完整信息的技术是很重要的。一个适当的形式设置是由所谓的Para完备逻辑给出的,其中,与经典框架相反,对于一些陈述,我们没有证据来得出它们是真还是假的结论。因此,例如,排中律是不成立的。本文证明了Para完备逻辑PComp的自动证明搜索技术如何有效地应用于不完备信息系统的推理。请注意,对于许多研究人员来说,自然演绎的核心特征之一,即引入任意公式作为假设的机会,一直是对证明搜索自动化的盗窃可能性的极大怀疑。在这里,我们不仅展示了相反的情况,而且我们还将假设管理变成了一个优势,表明了所提出的技术在假设保证推理中的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tackling Incomplete System Specifications Using Natural Deduction in the Paracomplete Setting
In many modern computer applications the significance of specification based verification is well accepted. However, when we deal with such complex processes as the integration of heterogeneous systems, parts of specification may be not known. Therefore it is important to have techniques that are able to cope with such incomplete information. An adequate formal setup is given by so called Para complete logics, where, contrary to the classical framework, for some statements we do not have evidence to conclude if they are true or false. As a consequence, for example, the law of excluded middle is not valid. In this paper we justify how the automated proof search technique for Para complete logic PComp can be efficiently applied to the reasoning about systems with incomplete information. Note that for many researchers, one of the core features of natural deduction, the opportunity to introduce arbitrary formulae as assumptions, has been a point of great scepticism regarding thievery possibility of the automation of the proof search. Here, not only we show the contrary, but we also turned the assumptions management into an advantage showing the applicability of the proposed technique to assume-guarantee reasoning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信