不同球囊组经皮经静脉二尖瓣合拢切开术的疗效比较——不同球囊组越大越好!

D. Farman, D. R. J. A. Sial, D. Khan, D. R. T. Saghir, D. Zaman
{"title":"不同球囊组经皮经静脉二尖瓣合拢切开术的疗效比较——不同球囊组越大越好!","authors":"D. Farman, D. R. J. A. Sial, D. Khan, D. R. T. Saghir, D. Zaman","doi":"10.1093/EURHEARTJ/EHT310.P5389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Although the Inoue balloon technique is said to be more popular worldwide for PTMC in those who have severe MS, the Bonhoeffer multi-track (double balloon technique) system is used in our center. On the other hand, it is unknown which balloon set size will produce the best results. The current study's objective is to assess the efficacy of different balloon sets utilized in symptomatic patients with moderate to severe mitral stenosis (MS) following percutaneous transvenous mitral commissurotomy (PTMC). \nMethodology: There were 203 consecutive patients. In 154 patients, a 14x14mm balloon set was used, and in the other 49 patients, a 14x16mm balloon set. PTMC was deemed successful when MVA 1.5 cm2 was attained with just minimal MR. Patients with valve areas less than 1.5 cm2 and more severe MR are regarded as failed. \nResults: With a 14x16mm balloon set, post-procedure examination revealed noticeably better accomplishment in the valve area (2.960.84 cm2 versus 3.260.95 cm2; P=0.024). With a 14x16mm balloon set, a tendency towards a lower post-procedure mean pressure gradient across the mitral valve was seen (6.052.19 mmHg versus 5.472.24 mmHg; P=0.107). There was no discernible change in post-procedure MR, tamponade, or procedural failure. However, there was no significant statistical difference in the treatment efficacy between the groups (87.7% with a 14x16mm balloon set versus 77.9% with a 14x14mm balloon set; P=0.153). \nConclusion: A 14x16 mm balloon set might be a better and safer option, particularly for taller and older patients with larger annuli.","PeriodicalId":438573,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Journal of Cardiovascular Intervention","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Outcomes of Different Balloon Sets in Patients undergoing Percutaneous Transvenous Mitral Commissurotomy – Bigger and Differ is Better!\",\"authors\":\"D. Farman, D. R. J. A. Sial, D. Khan, D. R. T. Saghir, D. Zaman\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/EURHEARTJ/EHT310.P5389\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Although the Inoue balloon technique is said to be more popular worldwide for PTMC in those who have severe MS, the Bonhoeffer multi-track (double balloon technique) system is used in our center. On the other hand, it is unknown which balloon set size will produce the best results. The current study's objective is to assess the efficacy of different balloon sets utilized in symptomatic patients with moderate to severe mitral stenosis (MS) following percutaneous transvenous mitral commissurotomy (PTMC). \\nMethodology: There were 203 consecutive patients. In 154 patients, a 14x14mm balloon set was used, and in the other 49 patients, a 14x16mm balloon set. PTMC was deemed successful when MVA 1.5 cm2 was attained with just minimal MR. Patients with valve areas less than 1.5 cm2 and more severe MR are regarded as failed. \\nResults: With a 14x16mm balloon set, post-procedure examination revealed noticeably better accomplishment in the valve area (2.960.84 cm2 versus 3.260.95 cm2; P=0.024). With a 14x16mm balloon set, a tendency towards a lower post-procedure mean pressure gradient across the mitral valve was seen (6.052.19 mmHg versus 5.472.24 mmHg; P=0.107). There was no discernible change in post-procedure MR, tamponade, or procedural failure. However, there was no significant statistical difference in the treatment efficacy between the groups (87.7% with a 14x16mm balloon set versus 77.9% with a 14x14mm balloon set; P=0.153). \\nConclusion: A 14x16 mm balloon set might be a better and safer option, particularly for taller and older patients with larger annuli.\",\"PeriodicalId\":438573,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pakistan Journal of Cardiovascular Intervention\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pakistan Journal of Cardiovascular Intervention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/EURHEARTJ/EHT310.P5389\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Journal of Cardiovascular Intervention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/EURHEARTJ/EHT310.P5389","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:虽然Inoue球囊技术据说在世界范围内更流行于重度MS患者的PTMC,但我们中心使用的是Bonhoeffer多轨(双球囊技术)系统。另一方面,不知道哪个气球集的大小将产生最好的结果。本研究的目的是评估不同球囊套用于中度至重度二尖瓣狭窄(MS)患者经皮经静脉二尖瓣合拢切开术(PTMC)后的疗效。方法:共203例患者。154例患者使用14x14mm球囊套装,49例患者使用14x16mm球囊套装。当MVA达到1.5 cm2, MR最小时,PTMC被认为是成功的。瓣膜面积小于1.5 cm2和MR更严重的患者被认为是失败的。结果:采用14x16mm球囊组,术后检查显示瓣膜面积完成率明显提高(2.960.84 cm2 vs 3.260.95 cm2;P = 0.024)。使用14x16mm球囊组,术后二尖瓣平均压力梯度有降低的趋势(6.052.19 mmHg vs 5.472.24 mmHg;P = 0.107)。术后MR、填塞或手术失败无明显变化。然而,两组治疗效果无显著统计学差异(14x16mm球囊组为87.7%,14x14mm球囊组为77.9%;P = 0.153)。结论:14x16mm球囊组可能是更好和更安全的选择,特别是对于高个子和老年患者较大的环空。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Outcomes of Different Balloon Sets in Patients undergoing Percutaneous Transvenous Mitral Commissurotomy – Bigger and Differ is Better!
Background: Although the Inoue balloon technique is said to be more popular worldwide for PTMC in those who have severe MS, the Bonhoeffer multi-track (double balloon technique) system is used in our center. On the other hand, it is unknown which balloon set size will produce the best results. The current study's objective is to assess the efficacy of different balloon sets utilized in symptomatic patients with moderate to severe mitral stenosis (MS) following percutaneous transvenous mitral commissurotomy (PTMC). Methodology: There were 203 consecutive patients. In 154 patients, a 14x14mm balloon set was used, and in the other 49 patients, a 14x16mm balloon set. PTMC was deemed successful when MVA 1.5 cm2 was attained with just minimal MR. Patients with valve areas less than 1.5 cm2 and more severe MR are regarded as failed. Results: With a 14x16mm balloon set, post-procedure examination revealed noticeably better accomplishment in the valve area (2.960.84 cm2 versus 3.260.95 cm2; P=0.024). With a 14x16mm balloon set, a tendency towards a lower post-procedure mean pressure gradient across the mitral valve was seen (6.052.19 mmHg versus 5.472.24 mmHg; P=0.107). There was no discernible change in post-procedure MR, tamponade, or procedural failure. However, there was no significant statistical difference in the treatment efficacy between the groups (87.7% with a 14x16mm balloon set versus 77.9% with a 14x14mm balloon set; P=0.153). Conclusion: A 14x16 mm balloon set might be a better and safer option, particularly for taller and older patients with larger annuli.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信