随意雇佣:随它去吧

Debra D. Burke, B. Little
{"title":"随意雇佣:随它去吧","authors":"Debra D. Burke, B. Little","doi":"10.2190/FCTV-NTPC-NYK9-Q6PW","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the United States, at-will employment is the bulwark of employment relationship. One estimate is that 60 percent of American workers are employed on an at-will basis [1], which according to common law, means that either the employer or the employee may terminate the employment relationship at any time, with or without cause. While this employment relationship has been recognized for over a century, it has deteriorated markedly in the past decades. The argument of this article is that, in actuality, employers have far less leeway in at-will situations than they believe. In addition, explicit at-will statements, which are meant to strengthen the employers’ situation, actually increase the likelihood that employees will feel unfairly treated. Based on these two arguments, this article suggests that employers should abandon the at-will doctrine and substitute a good faith dealing with employees. At-will employment has been the default employment relationship within the United States since the late 1800s. Under this doctrine, without a written employment contract or with an indefinite term of employment, either the employer or the employee may terminate the relationship for “good cause, bad cause, or no cause at all” [2]. While at first glance this appears to be an equal relationship, in actuality many people recognize that it is not a level playing field [3]. Being dismissed from employment has a far greater impact on an individual than a single individual’s resignation has on a company. Hence, several exceptions to the at-will employment doctrine have become widely recognized. These exceptions can be classified","PeriodicalId":371129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Individual Employment Rights","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"At-Will Employment: Just Let It Go\",\"authors\":\"Debra D. Burke, B. Little\",\"doi\":\"10.2190/FCTV-NTPC-NYK9-Q6PW\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the United States, at-will employment is the bulwark of employment relationship. One estimate is that 60 percent of American workers are employed on an at-will basis [1], which according to common law, means that either the employer or the employee may terminate the employment relationship at any time, with or without cause. While this employment relationship has been recognized for over a century, it has deteriorated markedly in the past decades. The argument of this article is that, in actuality, employers have far less leeway in at-will situations than they believe. In addition, explicit at-will statements, which are meant to strengthen the employers’ situation, actually increase the likelihood that employees will feel unfairly treated. Based on these two arguments, this article suggests that employers should abandon the at-will doctrine and substitute a good faith dealing with employees. At-will employment has been the default employment relationship within the United States since the late 1800s. Under this doctrine, without a written employment contract or with an indefinite term of employment, either the employer or the employee may terminate the relationship for “good cause, bad cause, or no cause at all” [2]. While at first glance this appears to be an equal relationship, in actuality many people recognize that it is not a level playing field [3]. Being dismissed from employment has a far greater impact on an individual than a single individual’s resignation has on a company. Hence, several exceptions to the at-will employment doctrine have become widely recognized. These exceptions can be classified\",\"PeriodicalId\":371129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Individual Employment Rights\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Individual Employment Rights\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2190/FCTV-NTPC-NYK9-Q6PW\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Individual Employment Rights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2190/FCTV-NTPC-NYK9-Q6PW","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在美国,随意雇佣是劳动关系的保障。据估计,60%的美国工人是在随意的基础上雇佣的[1],根据普通法,这意味着雇主或雇员可以在任何时候,有或没有理由终止雇佣关系。虽然这种雇佣关系已经被承认了一个多世纪,但在过去的几十年里,它已经明显恶化了。这篇文章的论点是,实际上,雇主在随意情况下的回旋余地比他们认为的要小得多。此外,明确的随意陈述,旨在加强雇主的情况,实际上增加了员工感到不公平对待的可能性。基于这两个论点,本文建议雇主应该放弃随意原则,代之以诚信对待员工。自19世纪后期以来,自由雇佣一直是美国默认的雇佣关系。根据这一原则,在没有书面雇佣合同或不确定雇佣期限的情况下,雇主或雇员都可以“正当理由、不良理由或根本没有理由”终止雇佣关系[2]。虽然乍一看,这似乎是一种平等的关系,但实际上,许多人认识到这不是一个公平的竞争环境[3]。被解雇对个人的影响远大于个人辞职对公司的影响。因此,自由雇佣原则的几个例外情况已得到广泛认可。这些例外可以分类
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
At-Will Employment: Just Let It Go
In the United States, at-will employment is the bulwark of employment relationship. One estimate is that 60 percent of American workers are employed on an at-will basis [1], which according to common law, means that either the employer or the employee may terminate the employment relationship at any time, with or without cause. While this employment relationship has been recognized for over a century, it has deteriorated markedly in the past decades. The argument of this article is that, in actuality, employers have far less leeway in at-will situations than they believe. In addition, explicit at-will statements, which are meant to strengthen the employers’ situation, actually increase the likelihood that employees will feel unfairly treated. Based on these two arguments, this article suggests that employers should abandon the at-will doctrine and substitute a good faith dealing with employees. At-will employment has been the default employment relationship within the United States since the late 1800s. Under this doctrine, without a written employment contract or with an indefinite term of employment, either the employer or the employee may terminate the relationship for “good cause, bad cause, or no cause at all” [2]. While at first glance this appears to be an equal relationship, in actuality many people recognize that it is not a level playing field [3]. Being dismissed from employment has a far greater impact on an individual than a single individual’s resignation has on a company. Hence, several exceptions to the at-will employment doctrine have become widely recognized. These exceptions can be classified
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信