评估当前实地图和激光雷达“虚拟”图，作为历史和当前陆地卫星数据的多时间分析分类程序指南，以确定森林年龄等级

International Workshop on the Analysis of Multi-Temporal Remote Sensing Images, 2005. Pub Date : 2005-05-16 DOI:10.1109/AMTRSI.2005.1469842

W. Cooke, C. Prabhu, R. Wallis, J. Morris, B. Smith, J. Gilreath

{"title":"评估当前实地图和激光雷达“虚拟”图，作为历史和当前陆地卫星数据的多时间分析分类程序指南，以确定森林年龄等级","authors":"W. Cooke, C. Prabhu, R. Wallis, J. Morris, B. Smith, J. Gilreath","doi":"10.1109/AMTRSI.2005.1469842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Euclidean distance measures and Landsat ETM+ band combinations and transformations are tested for their usefulness in classification of volume. Field plots are used for training and validation. Early results indicate that a Euclidean distance of 18 optimizes classification accuracies for volume. Tests for optimal band combinations were inconclusive.","PeriodicalId":302923,"journal":{"name":"International Workshop on the Analysis of Multi-Temporal Remote Sensing Images, 2005.","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of current field plots and lidar 'virtual' plots as guides to classification procedures for multitemporal analysis of historic and current landsat data for determining forest age classes\",\"authors\":\"W. Cooke, C. Prabhu, R. Wallis, J. Morris, B. Smith, J. Gilreath\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/AMTRSI.2005.1469842\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Euclidean distance measures and Landsat ETM+ band combinations and transformations are tested for their usefulness in classification of volume. Field plots are used for training and validation. Early results indicate that a Euclidean distance of 18 optimizes classification accuracies for volume. Tests for optimal band combinations were inconclusive.\",\"PeriodicalId\":302923,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Workshop on the Analysis of Multi-Temporal Remote Sensing Images, 2005.\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Workshop on the Analysis of Multi-Temporal Remote Sensing Images, 2005.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/AMTRSI.2005.1469842\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Workshop on the Analysis of Multi-Temporal Remote Sensing Images, 2005.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AMTRSI.2005.1469842","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

欧几里得距离测量和Landsat ETM+波段组合和转换在体积分类中的有效性进行了测试。现场图用于训练和验证。早期的结果表明，欧几里得距离为18对体积的分类精度是最佳的。最佳波段组合的试验尚无定论。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Assessment of current field plots and lidar 'virtual' plots as guides to classification procedures for multitemporal analysis of historic and current landsat data for determining forest age classes

Euclidean distance measures and Landsat ETM+ band combinations and transformations are tested for their usefulness in classification of volume. Field plots are used for training and validation. Early results indicate that a Euclidean distance of 18 optimizes classification accuracies for volume. Tests for optimal band combinations were inconclusive.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

International Workshop on the Analysis of Multi-Temporal Remote Sensing Images, 2005.

自引率

0.00%

发文量