后记

Kenneth Bertrams, Julien del Marmol, S. Geerts, E. Poelmans
{"title":"后记","authors":"Kenneth Bertrams, Julien del Marmol, S. Geerts, E. Poelmans","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198829089.003.0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After the IPO and the Bass dealings, Interbrew was put under a microscope by the media and investors. Beck’s in Germany was the next big move in rolling up the remainder of Western Europe. Beck’s was an acquisition of major importance: it was a very visible brand with popularity outside of Germany, the competition for its take-over was fierce, and above all the acquisition was highly mediatized. The acquisition was already announced in August 2001, but the deal was not closed until February 2002. At the time, Interbrew’s image had already taken a hit following the Bass fiasco. It was therefore in dire need of a win. Unfortunately, the media and stock market felt they paid an exaggerated multiple for the brewery. Indeed, the price was almost double of what had been put on the table during the first rounds of negotiations, but, the board—especially in favour of the take-over—and the management believed in the brand’s strength and future potential. Some months later, in late 2002, Interbrew was penalized by investors after it failed to properly communicate a lower EBITDA than predicted. What would not have been a real problem before, had a direct effect on the stock price of the company. The reality of the post-IPO era made it clear that both management and board would have to adapt their communication and style....","PeriodicalId":391654,"journal":{"name":"Becoming the World's Biggest Brewer","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Epilogue\",\"authors\":\"Kenneth Bertrams, Julien del Marmol, S. Geerts, E. Poelmans\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780198829089.003.0008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"After the IPO and the Bass dealings, Interbrew was put under a microscope by the media and investors. Beck’s in Germany was the next big move in rolling up the remainder of Western Europe. Beck’s was an acquisition of major importance: it was a very visible brand with popularity outside of Germany, the competition for its take-over was fierce, and above all the acquisition was highly mediatized. The acquisition was already announced in August 2001, but the deal was not closed until February 2002. At the time, Interbrew’s image had already taken a hit following the Bass fiasco. It was therefore in dire need of a win. Unfortunately, the media and stock market felt they paid an exaggerated multiple for the brewery. Indeed, the price was almost double of what had been put on the table during the first rounds of negotiations, but, the board—especially in favour of the take-over—and the management believed in the brand’s strength and future potential. Some months later, in late 2002, Interbrew was penalized by investors after it failed to properly communicate a lower EBITDA than predicted. What would not have been a real problem before, had a direct effect on the stock price of the company. The reality of the post-IPO era made it clear that both management and board would have to adapt their communication and style....\",\"PeriodicalId\":391654,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Becoming the World's Biggest Brewer\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Becoming the World's Biggest Brewer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198829089.003.0008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Becoming the World's Biggest Brewer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198829089.003.0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在首次公开募股和与Bass的交易之后,Interbrew受到了媒体和投资者的密切关注。贝克在德国的建厂是他在西欧其他地区扩张的又一重大举措。贝克的收购具有重大意义:它是一个在德国以外非常受欢迎的品牌,收购竞争非常激烈,最重要的是,收购是高度中介化的。这项收购早在2001年8月就宣布了,但直到2002年2月才完成。当时,Interbrew的形象已经因为Bass的惨败而受到了打击。因此,它迫切需要一场胜利。不幸的是,媒体和股票市场认为他们为这家啤酒厂支付了过高的价格。事实上,这个价格几乎是第一轮谈判时的两倍,但是,董事会——尤其是赞成收购的董事会——和管理层都相信这个品牌的实力和未来的潜力。几个月后,也就是2002年底,因未能正确传达EBITDA低于预期,Interbrew遭到了投资者的惩罚。这在以前根本不是什么大问题,现在却直接影响到了公司的股价。后ipo时代的现实清楚地表明,管理层和董事会都必须调整他们的沟通方式和风格....
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Epilogue
After the IPO and the Bass dealings, Interbrew was put under a microscope by the media and investors. Beck’s in Germany was the next big move in rolling up the remainder of Western Europe. Beck’s was an acquisition of major importance: it was a very visible brand with popularity outside of Germany, the competition for its take-over was fierce, and above all the acquisition was highly mediatized. The acquisition was already announced in August 2001, but the deal was not closed until February 2002. At the time, Interbrew’s image had already taken a hit following the Bass fiasco. It was therefore in dire need of a win. Unfortunately, the media and stock market felt they paid an exaggerated multiple for the brewery. Indeed, the price was almost double of what had been put on the table during the first rounds of negotiations, but, the board—especially in favour of the take-over—and the management believed in the brand’s strength and future potential. Some months later, in late 2002, Interbrew was penalized by investors after it failed to properly communicate a lower EBITDA than predicted. What would not have been a real problem before, had a direct effect on the stock price of the company. The reality of the post-IPO era made it clear that both management and board would have to adapt their communication and style....
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信