" Lengthening "是比" round "更好的元音量纲。

Henri Boshoff
{"title":"\" Lengthening \"是比\" round \"更好的元音量纲。","authors":"Henri Boshoff","doi":"10.1109/AFRCON.2007.4401617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The impressionistic phonetic specification of vowel quality is usually given in terms of the quasi-articulatory dimensions \"height,\" \"backness\" and \"rounding,\" relative to the quality of the cardinal vowels placed in a stylized vowel quadrilateral. For some purposes, an acoustic approach to vowel dimensions may be preferable. A system of reference vowels created by a scaling discretisation of formant space (SDF) is used in this study to derive new acoustic dimensions closely aligned to the traditional dimensions mentioned above. Some implications of the new acoustic dimensions for vowel classification are investigated, using a well-known vowel dataset. Based on this analysis, it is argued that \"lengthening\" is a more appropriate vowel dimension than \"rounding.\"","PeriodicalId":112129,"journal":{"name":"AFRICON 2007","volume":"136 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Lengthening” is a better vowel dimension than “rounding”\",\"authors\":\"Henri Boshoff\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/AFRCON.2007.4401617\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The impressionistic phonetic specification of vowel quality is usually given in terms of the quasi-articulatory dimensions \\\"height,\\\" \\\"backness\\\" and \\\"rounding,\\\" relative to the quality of the cardinal vowels placed in a stylized vowel quadrilateral. For some purposes, an acoustic approach to vowel dimensions may be preferable. A system of reference vowels created by a scaling discretisation of formant space (SDF) is used in this study to derive new acoustic dimensions closely aligned to the traditional dimensions mentioned above. Some implications of the new acoustic dimensions for vowel classification are investigated, using a well-known vowel dataset. Based on this analysis, it is argued that \\\"lengthening\\\" is a more appropriate vowel dimension than \\\"rounding.\\\"\",\"PeriodicalId\":112129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AFRICON 2007\",\"volume\":\"136 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AFRICON 2007\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/AFRCON.2007.4401617\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AFRICON 2007","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AFRCON.2007.4401617","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

元音音质的印象派语音规范通常是根据准发音维度“高”、“后”和“圆”给出的,相对于一个程式化元音四边形中基本元音的音质。出于某些目的,用声学方法来测定元音的尺寸可能是可取的。在本研究中使用了一个由形成体空间(SDF)的尺度离散化创建的参考元音系统,以获得与上述传统尺寸密切相关的新声学尺寸。使用一个著名的元音数据集,研究了新的声学维度对元音分类的影响。基于这一分析,我们认为“加长”是一个比“四舍五入”更合适的元音量纲。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“Lengthening” is a better vowel dimension than “rounding”
The impressionistic phonetic specification of vowel quality is usually given in terms of the quasi-articulatory dimensions "height," "backness" and "rounding," relative to the quality of the cardinal vowels placed in a stylized vowel quadrilateral. For some purposes, an acoustic approach to vowel dimensions may be preferable. A system of reference vowels created by a scaling discretisation of formant space (SDF) is used in this study to derive new acoustic dimensions closely aligned to the traditional dimensions mentioned above. Some implications of the new acoustic dimensions for vowel classification are investigated, using a well-known vowel dataset. Based on this analysis, it is argued that "lengthening" is a more appropriate vowel dimension than "rounding."
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信