用矩阵法诱导意义的深浅:观点主位分析的第一步

David Novakovitch, P. Bruza, Laurianne Sitbon
{"title":"用矩阵法诱导意义的深浅:观点主位分析的第一步","authors":"David Novakovitch, P. Bruza, Laurianne Sitbon","doi":"10.1109/SEMAPRO.2009.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores two matrix methods to induce the “shades of meaning” (SoM) of a word. A matrix representation of a word is computed from a corpus of traces based on the given word. Non-negative Matrix Factorisation (NMF) and Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) compute a set of vectors corresponding to a potential shade of meaning. The two methods were evaluated based on loss of conditional entropy with respect to two sets of manually tagged data. One set reflects concepts generally appearing in text, and the second set comprises words used for investigations into word sense disambiguation. Results show that for NMF consistently outperforms SVD for inducing both SoM of general concepts as well as word senses. The problem of inducing the shades of meaning of a word is more subtle than that of word sense induction and hence relevant to thematic analysis of opinion where nuances of opinion can arise.","PeriodicalId":288269,"journal":{"name":"2009 Third International Conference on Advances in Semantic Processing","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inducing Shades of Meaning by Matrix Methods : A First Step Towards Thematic Analysis of Opinion\",\"authors\":\"David Novakovitch, P. Bruza, Laurianne Sitbon\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SEMAPRO.2009.8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article explores two matrix methods to induce the “shades of meaning” (SoM) of a word. A matrix representation of a word is computed from a corpus of traces based on the given word. Non-negative Matrix Factorisation (NMF) and Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) compute a set of vectors corresponding to a potential shade of meaning. The two methods were evaluated based on loss of conditional entropy with respect to two sets of manually tagged data. One set reflects concepts generally appearing in text, and the second set comprises words used for investigations into word sense disambiguation. Results show that for NMF consistently outperforms SVD for inducing both SoM of general concepts as well as word senses. The problem of inducing the shades of meaning of a word is more subtle than that of word sense induction and hence relevant to thematic analysis of opinion where nuances of opinion can arise.\",\"PeriodicalId\":288269,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2009 Third International Conference on Advances in Semantic Processing\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2009 Third International Conference on Advances in Semantic Processing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SEMAPRO.2009.8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 Third International Conference on Advances in Semantic Processing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SEMAPRO.2009.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

本文探讨了两种矩阵法来归纳一个词的“意义阴影”。从基于给定单词的语料库中计算单词的矩阵表示。非负矩阵分解(NMF)和奇异值分解(SVD)计算一组对应于潜在意义阴影的向量。基于两组手动标记数据的条件熵损失对这两种方法进行了评估。一组反映了通常出现在文本中的概念,另一组包括用于研究词义消歧的单词。结果表明,NMF在诱导一般概念和词义的SoM方面始终优于SVD。归纳一个词的意义阴影的问题比词义归纳的问题更微妙,因此与可能产生细微差别的观点的主题分析有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Inducing Shades of Meaning by Matrix Methods : A First Step Towards Thematic Analysis of Opinion
This article explores two matrix methods to induce the “shades of meaning” (SoM) of a word. A matrix representation of a word is computed from a corpus of traces based on the given word. Non-negative Matrix Factorisation (NMF) and Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) compute a set of vectors corresponding to a potential shade of meaning. The two methods were evaluated based on loss of conditional entropy with respect to two sets of manually tagged data. One set reflects concepts generally appearing in text, and the second set comprises words used for investigations into word sense disambiguation. Results show that for NMF consistently outperforms SVD for inducing both SoM of general concepts as well as word senses. The problem of inducing the shades of meaning of a word is more subtle than that of word sense induction and hence relevant to thematic analysis of opinion where nuances of opinion can arise.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信