R. Heckemann, A. Hammers, P. Aljabar, D. Rueckert, J. Hajnal
{"title":"图谱标签传播中分割质量评估的镜像方法","authors":"R. Heckemann, A. Hammers, P. Aljabar, D. Rueckert, J. Hajnal","doi":"10.1109/ISBI.2009.5193272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Atlas-based brain image segmentation quality is difficult to assess in the absence of reference target segmentations. We propose a measure of segmentation success based on transforming the atlas label twice: once by registering the atlas to the target and a second time by registering the target to the atlas. Each registration represents transformations by free-form deformations. The overlap between the twice-transformed label and the original (‘mirror overlap’) correlates with the forward overlap (between the once-transformed label and a target reference), especially for subcortical structures. Using mirror overlap as an atlas selection criterion results in improved segmentations versus random selection.","PeriodicalId":272938,"journal":{"name":"2009 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The mirror method of assessing segmentation quality in atlas label propagation\",\"authors\":\"R. Heckemann, A. Hammers, P. Aljabar, D. Rueckert, J. Hajnal\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISBI.2009.5193272\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Atlas-based brain image segmentation quality is difficult to assess in the absence of reference target segmentations. We propose a measure of segmentation success based on transforming the atlas label twice: once by registering the atlas to the target and a second time by registering the target to the atlas. Each registration represents transformations by free-form deformations. The overlap between the twice-transformed label and the original (‘mirror overlap’) correlates with the forward overlap (between the once-transformed label and a target reference), especially for subcortical structures. Using mirror overlap as an atlas selection criterion results in improved segmentations versus random selection.\",\"PeriodicalId\":272938,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2009 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2009 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISBI.2009.5193272\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISBI.2009.5193272","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The mirror method of assessing segmentation quality in atlas label propagation
Atlas-based brain image segmentation quality is difficult to assess in the absence of reference target segmentations. We propose a measure of segmentation success based on transforming the atlas label twice: once by registering the atlas to the target and a second time by registering the target to the atlas. Each registration represents transformations by free-form deformations. The overlap between the twice-transformed label and the original (‘mirror overlap’) correlates with the forward overlap (between the once-transformed label and a target reference), especially for subcortical structures. Using mirror overlap as an atlas selection criterion results in improved segmentations versus random selection.