基于关节间隙的球面并联机器人精度比较

Seyed Mojtaba, S. Mousavi, A. Khoogar, M. T. Masouleh
{"title":"基于关节间隙的球面并联机器人精度比较","authors":"Seyed Mojtaba, S. Mousavi, A. Khoogar, M. T. Masouleh","doi":"10.1109/ICROM.2017.8466141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, three types of Spherical Parallel Manipulators (SPM) are compared from accuracy point of view based on joint clearances. The 3-RRR SPM is an overconstraint parallel mechanism and one can presume that it may exhibits an accurate motion. But beside the foregoing advantage, this structure has some drawbacks such as requiring high manufacturing precision and the difficulty of assembling the mechanism. Two other types, 3-RRS and 3-RSR, are non-overconstrained and do not have the above disadvantages, therefore these two types with 3- RRR are put into contrast from accuracy point of view. First, a method to obtain a model of moving platform pose (position and orientation) error is introduced which leads to a standard convex optimization problem. Since error calculation depends on the end-effector configuration, more than 1000 configurations are taken into account in order to cover SPMs workspaces. Then maximum values of six components of the pose error in each configuration are computed for each type. Finally, the three SPMs are compared based on maximum position and orientation error for given joint clearances. The obtained results revealed that the 3- RRR SPM has better position accuracy while in the case of orientation, the 3-RRS SPM has lowest maximum error between SPMs under study in the prescribed workspace.","PeriodicalId":166992,"journal":{"name":"2017 5th RSI International Conference on Robotics and Mechatronics (ICRoM)","volume":"517 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy Comparison of Spherical Parallel Manipulators Based on Joint Clearance\",\"authors\":\"Seyed Mojtaba, S. Mousavi, A. Khoogar, M. T. Masouleh\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICROM.2017.8466141\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, three types of Spherical Parallel Manipulators (SPM) are compared from accuracy point of view based on joint clearances. The 3-RRR SPM is an overconstraint parallel mechanism and one can presume that it may exhibits an accurate motion. But beside the foregoing advantage, this structure has some drawbacks such as requiring high manufacturing precision and the difficulty of assembling the mechanism. Two other types, 3-RRS and 3-RSR, are non-overconstrained and do not have the above disadvantages, therefore these two types with 3- RRR are put into contrast from accuracy point of view. First, a method to obtain a model of moving platform pose (position and orientation) error is introduced which leads to a standard convex optimization problem. Since error calculation depends on the end-effector configuration, more than 1000 configurations are taken into account in order to cover SPMs workspaces. Then maximum values of six components of the pose error in each configuration are computed for each type. Finally, the three SPMs are compared based on maximum position and orientation error for given joint clearances. The obtained results revealed that the 3- RRR SPM has better position accuracy while in the case of orientation, the 3-RRS SPM has lowest maximum error between SPMs under study in the prescribed workspace.\",\"PeriodicalId\":166992,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 5th RSI International Conference on Robotics and Mechatronics (ICRoM)\",\"volume\":\"517 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 5th RSI International Conference on Robotics and Mechatronics (ICRoM)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICROM.2017.8466141\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 5th RSI International Conference on Robotics and Mechatronics (ICRoM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICROM.2017.8466141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

从基于关节间隙的精度角度对三种球面并联机构进行了比较。3-RRR SPM是一种过约束并联机构,可以假设它可能表现出精确的运动。但除了上述优点外,该结构还存在制造精度要求高、机构装配困难等缺点。另外两种类型,3- rrs和3- rsr,是非过度约束的,没有上述缺点,因此从精度的角度将这两种具有3- RRR的类型进行对比。首先,提出了一种求解运动平台位姿(位姿)误差模型的方法,该方法求解标准凸优化问题。由于误差计算取决于末端执行器的配置,因此为了覆盖spm工作空间,考虑了1000多种配置。然后计算出每种构型下姿态误差的六个分量的最大值。最后,根据给定关节间隙的最大位置和方向误差对三种spm进行比较。结果表明,在给定工作空间下,3- rrs SPM具有较好的定位精度,而在定向情况下,3- rrs SPM的最大误差最小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Accuracy Comparison of Spherical Parallel Manipulators Based on Joint Clearance
In this paper, three types of Spherical Parallel Manipulators (SPM) are compared from accuracy point of view based on joint clearances. The 3-RRR SPM is an overconstraint parallel mechanism and one can presume that it may exhibits an accurate motion. But beside the foregoing advantage, this structure has some drawbacks such as requiring high manufacturing precision and the difficulty of assembling the mechanism. Two other types, 3-RRS and 3-RSR, are non-overconstrained and do not have the above disadvantages, therefore these two types with 3- RRR are put into contrast from accuracy point of view. First, a method to obtain a model of moving platform pose (position and orientation) error is introduced which leads to a standard convex optimization problem. Since error calculation depends on the end-effector configuration, more than 1000 configurations are taken into account in order to cover SPMs workspaces. Then maximum values of six components of the pose error in each configuration are computed for each type. Finally, the three SPMs are compared based on maximum position and orientation error for given joint clearances. The obtained results revealed that the 3- RRR SPM has better position accuracy while in the case of orientation, the 3-RRS SPM has lowest maximum error between SPMs under study in the prescribed workspace.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信