{"title":"一个简单的图像预测变换编码器","authors":"E. Feria, J. Barba, N. Scheinberg","doi":"10.1109/MILCOM.1986.4805877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper a simple predictive transform coder is proposed for the processing of images. The coder is intrafield and predicts the coefficients of a two-dimensional Hadamard transform based on the past pels immediately surrounding the transformed block. The cost and performance of the new coder compares well with that of other techniques. For example, a predictive transform coder acting on 2×2 picture blocks and operating at an average bit rate of 2 bits/pel is found to yield significantly better picture quality than that derived from a 2×2 or even a 4×4 Hadamard coder. Also, just as important, the physical implementation of this coder requires from two to three times the number of on-line operations required by a 2×2 Hadamard coder and 1/4 to 1/3 that of a 4×4 Hadamard coder.","PeriodicalId":126184,"journal":{"name":"MILCOM 1986 - IEEE Military Communications Conference: Communications-Computers: Teamed for the 90's","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Simple Predictive Transform Coder for Images\",\"authors\":\"E. Feria, J. Barba, N. Scheinberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MILCOM.1986.4805877\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper a simple predictive transform coder is proposed for the processing of images. The coder is intrafield and predicts the coefficients of a two-dimensional Hadamard transform based on the past pels immediately surrounding the transformed block. The cost and performance of the new coder compares well with that of other techniques. For example, a predictive transform coder acting on 2×2 picture blocks and operating at an average bit rate of 2 bits/pel is found to yield significantly better picture quality than that derived from a 2×2 or even a 4×4 Hadamard coder. Also, just as important, the physical implementation of this coder requires from two to three times the number of on-line operations required by a 2×2 Hadamard coder and 1/4 to 1/3 that of a 4×4 Hadamard coder.\",\"PeriodicalId\":126184,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MILCOM 1986 - IEEE Military Communications Conference: Communications-Computers: Teamed for the 90's\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1986-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MILCOM 1986 - IEEE Military Communications Conference: Communications-Computers: Teamed for the 90's\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MILCOM.1986.4805877\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MILCOM 1986 - IEEE Military Communications Conference: Communications-Computers: Teamed for the 90's","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MILCOM.1986.4805877","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
In this paper a simple predictive transform coder is proposed for the processing of images. The coder is intrafield and predicts the coefficients of a two-dimensional Hadamard transform based on the past pels immediately surrounding the transformed block. The cost and performance of the new coder compares well with that of other techniques. For example, a predictive transform coder acting on 2×2 picture blocks and operating at an average bit rate of 2 bits/pel is found to yield significantly better picture quality than that derived from a 2×2 or even a 4×4 Hadamard coder. Also, just as important, the physical implementation of this coder requires from two to three times the number of on-line operations required by a 2×2 Hadamard coder and 1/4 to 1/3 that of a 4×4 Hadamard coder.